periferal
Registered User
- Jul 5, 2007
- 29,098
- 16,473
On a short 2 year deal?? He's a proven playoff performer, which, in case you haven't been paying attention, the Rangers seem to be lacking.God please no.
On a short 2 year deal?? He's a proven playoff performer, which, in case you haven't been paying attention, the Rangers seem to be lacking.
Hahaha.... I did indeed. Touché.Then you totally missed that I'm an Islanders fan.
You'll like him and welcome him back.No thanks, didn't like him in his prime, want nothing to do with him now
Then you totally missed that I'm an Islanders fan.
Rumour SJ claiming Goodrow
I’m sure Rangers owe them something
Yes your playoff scorer moved for freeSharks will be claiming him. Hail Drury.
What injuries did I celebrate? I’m legitimately curious as I don’t recall this at all. I don’t like the Rangers team and I don’t hide that fact but other than sorting back and forth with some jokes I try to be level headed when it comes to hockey talk.Makes perfect sense for the Rangers to waive him to allow teams to see if they want to add him now. No harm done in giving it a shot. Goodrow had a NTC as well.
As to your poster quoted, he is a huge troll who celebrated Rangers injuries in the regular season and then disappeared when his team did in the playoff series against the Rangers as well.
If they buy him out, that gives the Rangers a bit over $13 million in cap space, which begs the next question. Who are they after on July 1st?
He’s overpaid for what he does but SJ could use a veteran who has been with good teams. Not an attractive spot for players to go unless they overpay to endure losing.Rumour SJ claiming Goodrow
I’m sure Rangers owe them something
You're losing sight of the forest because of a tree.Waiving him doesn't prevent a buyout
If someone claims him, it's a great move. If not, he gets bought out anyway.
Not sure I see the error here.
15 team no trade clause.Did he have any trade control and blocked s trade?
Sharks don't need to be in the business of doing anyone any favors which is what claiming Goodrow would be if there's nothing on the side. There are better vets out there for them than another 4th liner like Sturm.hes a solid fit for the sharks. If you have a young team that needs vet leadership and a great locker room guy, hes a great guy to have if you have cap space which the sharks have plenty of
It's not that hard to understand. He wasn't actually that good in the playoffs. He scored some clutch goals on 40% shooting and he's a good PKer. He doesn't score goals like that consistently, regular season or playoffs, and we can find someone to PK for less.Rangers felt he was too good in the post season and they like to allocate $ towards players who don't find ways to produce in the post season.
Goodrow is a great role player and you need players like him to win a Cup. I don't get this move.
Kane.If they buy him out, that gives the Rangers a bit over $13 million in cap space, which begs the next question. Who are they after on July 1st?
Hopefully defenseIf they buy him out, that gives the Rangers a bit over $13 million in cap space, which begs the next question. Who are they after on July 1st?