Claimed off Waivers: [SJS] F Barclay Goodrow claimed by San Jose

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

TBF1972

Registered User
May 19, 2018
8,248
6,743
Really odd that he's getting waived right now in the middle of the cup finals. No one is going to claim him obviously, so what's really the purpose?



Oh they're delusional and hoping someone claims him.

devils will wait until they waive shesterkin :naughty:
 

Nanuuk

Registered User
Nov 16, 2013
2,713
1,327
Calgary, Alberta
A bit of a head scratcher to me. Yes he had a bad season compared to his previous two (33, 31 points), but this is no indicator that he will have another bad season going forward.

When he is in the 30 point range his contract is more or less reasonable.

Why wouldn't NYR trade him and retain a million instead of waiving him if this move is purely for cap reasons?
 

krutovsdonut

eeyore
Sep 25, 2016
17,438
10,171
A bit of a head scratcher to me. Yes he had a bad season compared to his previous two (33, 31 points), but this is no indicator that he will have another bad season going forward.
the team may be trying to make a point or move him to a team with interest without a trade. possibly related to him having a 15 team ntc clause.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dijock94

Filthy Dangles

Registered User*
Sponsor
Oct 23, 2014
29,496
41,635
Why wouldn't NYR trade him and retain a million instead of waiving him if this move is purely for cap reasons?

What don’t you understand? If he’s claimed, his cap hit totally vanishes

If they retain a mil, he still costs 2.5 the next 3 years
 

Nanuuk

Registered User
Nov 16, 2013
2,713
1,327
Calgary, Alberta
What don’t you understand? If he’s claimed, his cap hit totally vanishes

If they retain a mil, he still costs 2.5 the next 3 years
If he is claimed. The way some posters are carrying on around here they make it very doubtful. And you also imply that the sole purpose is to 'get rid of him' for cap room and the idea of garnering a return for that 1M of retention isn't worth it.
 

Filthy Dangles

Registered User*
Sponsor
Oct 23, 2014
29,496
41,635
If he is claimed. The way some posters are carrying on around here they make it very doubtful. And you also imply that the sole purpose is to 'get rid of him' for cap room and the idea of garnering a return for that 1M of retention isn't worth it.

You said “if purely for cap reasons”

This way gives Rangers most cap space and potentially gets around his NTC if a team on his list wants him
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dijock94

Cas

Conversational Black Hole
Sponsor
Jun 23, 2020
5,821
8,401
I wonder if a team like the Sharks just outright claims him. He’s familiar to the team and would find a veteran player signed for 3 years useful to ride with their rookies.
Why would we bother? We can resign people like Kunin (ugh) to fill the same role.
 

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,524
13,020
South Mountain
He clears waivers tomorrow and gets bought out as soon as the window opens.

He has to clear Unconditional Waivers before being bought out. By all accounts he's currently on Regular Waivers, meaning he'd have to be waived again prior to buyout.
 

Kupo

MAFIA, MOUNT UP!
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2017
11,635
24,705
Stamford CT
Maybe this will put an end to NYR fans proposing other teams trade actual assets for him/his contract.
Neverrrrr!!!!
mens-fanatics-navy-new-york-rangers-2022-stanley-cup-playoffs-no-quit-in-new-york-t-shirt_pi4878000_altimages_ff_4878680-547b4b0f20867aacf1c1alt4_full.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Weltschmerz

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad