Not good enough - no playoffs again!

Relapsing

Registered User
Jul 3, 2018
2,586
2,441
Only 6teams in the nhl last year held over a .600 winning percentage over the year and 2 of them were just at .600 Its just not done to often

I'm not a downer just a realist I do love my team but they give me heart aches and I can't bare to watch a game only highlights and box scores for me lately
And I don't think this team has ever had a meaningful stretch of games where they hit that win percentage. Going 2/3, sure. But 6/10? 12/20? No chance
 

Big Muddy

Registered User
Dec 15, 2019
9,036
4,370
Only 6teams in the nhl last year held over a .600 winning percentage over the year and 2 of them were just at .600 Its just not done to often

I'm not a downer just a realist I do love my team but they give me heart aches and I can't bare to watch a game only highlights and box scores for me lately
I think most folks would agree that the Senators have a steep hill to climb and the odds are against them. I think people (myself included) are just playing around with the math trying to get the more detailed picture.
 

PlayOn

Registered User
Jun 22, 2010
1,997
2,600
Here's the kicker. If we have a high pick this year, odds are good there are changes and we have a high pick next year too. So...do we forfeit this years pick and hope for Mckenna next year? This is where we are at.
Garrioch suggested the Sens were going to request an extension and that they’d be using this pick even if they miss the playoffs.

My guess is they plan on doing a 2 year retool if we miss the playoffs again and will ask Bettman to add two years to the pick forfeiture so they can avoid giving up either pick.
 

Loach

Registered User
Jun 9, 2021
3,435
2,433
Garrioch suggested the Sens were going to request an extension and that they’d be using this pick even if they miss the playoffs.

My guess is they plan on doing a 2 year retool if we miss the playoffs again and will ask Bettman to add two years to the pick forfeiture so they can avoid giving up either pick.
Where was this? On tv?
 

Loach

Registered User
Jun 9, 2021
3,435
2,433
Yeah during the game Bettman was at
BooBoo doesn't have a clue about anything. He just did the Dark Ones bidding before. This organization doesn't leak info anymore and it won't be tolerated. You can see it everytime he asks a question.
 

Senovision

Registered User
May 23, 2011
2,916
1,969
We are 11th in the NHL in the goals for per game at 3.11
We are tied for 10th with Detroit goals against per game at 3.21
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
56,993
34,765
Only 6teams in the nhl last year held over a .600 winning percentage over the year and 2 of them were just at .600 Its just not done to often

I'm not a downer just a realist I do love my team but they give me heart aches and I can't bare to watch a game only highlights and box scores for me lately
Right now, the final wildcard spot by pts% is held by Buf, they are on pace for 86 pts

For us to reach 87 pts, we'd need to get 70 pts in the final 63 games, or a .555 winning % which would rank 15th in the NHL right now,

We just need to be better than Buf, Bost,. Det, Mtl, NYI, Clb, Phi and the Pens at the end of the year (assuming none of the teams pacing at over 100 pts fail to maintain their play)
 

swiftwin

★SUMMER.OF.STEVE★
Jul 26, 2005
24,219
13,931
We are 11th in the NHL in the goals for per game at 3.11
We are tied for 10th with Detroit goals against per game at 3.21
We're also 5th best in the league at expected goals differential 5 on 5
1732393414565.png


It's actually our special teams letting us down right now, which is easier to correct than 5v5 play.
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
56,993
34,765
We are 11th in the NHL in the goals for per game at 3.11
We are tied for 10th with Detroit goals against per game at 3.21
We are a bit of an outlier in the standings when it comes to goal differential,

Boston, Detroit, Philly, Pens, and Mtl are all double digits in the negative, while we are -2. Even the Islanders are -8.

Actually, last year was a bit of an oddity with two teams deep in the red making the playoffs, Washington got most of the spotlight at -37 but the NYI at -17 was pretty wild too.
 

Tuna99

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
15,915
7,879
I think before the 4 game losing streaour underlying stats looked good, today they don’t, Horrid, almost the entire team is a -, bad road and home record, negative goal defferrntial, the goalies stink.

We’re going to be buried under an avalanche of bad stats soon, right now it’s just a snow bank
 

swiftwin

★SUMMER.OF.STEVE★
Jul 26, 2005
24,219
13,931
I think before the 4 game losing streaour underlying stats looked good, today they don’t, Horrid, almost the entire team is a -, bad road and home record, negative goal defferrntial, the goalies stink.

We’re going to be buried under an avalanche of bad stats soon, right now it’s just a snow bank
Huh? The underlying stats are still good. Do you have evidence showing the underlying numbers are bad?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad