What’s Nick Ritchie’s status with the Toronto Maple Leafs? It’s complicated | The Star
Nick Ritchie was clearly uncomfortable and unhappy answering questions about his new life as a Toronto Marlie.
“It’s hockey, so it is what it is, and it’s just nice to get out and play,” said Ritchie, who scored in his Marlies debut on Wednesday. “They’ve got some good guys here and good coaching staff, so it’s good that way.”
The words were fine, but the body language said otherwise as he was asked what he thought went wrong with him and the Maple Leafs. “There’s a number of things. Probably won’t have enough time to get into that.”
His answers were short. The shortest being a simple “no” when asked if he was looking for a fresh start with another NHL team. He answered as he walked away.
And he shouldn’t be happy. This is not how he mapped out the next step in his career when he signed a two-year, $2.5-million (U.S.) contract to play with the Toronto Maple Leafs this season. The once highly-touted first-round pick from Orangeville was getting his chance with his hometown team, who’d courted him and considered him their prized free agent signing of the summer, a cheaper version of Zach Hyman with more offensive upside.
.............................
And now his journey back to the NHL could become more complicated pending the fate of Adam Brooks, who is clearly a Sheldon Keefe favourite.
The Maple Leafs re-acquired Brooks off waivers on Wednesday and put him right back on waivers on Thursday, hoping he clears, so he can be sent to the minors until called upon in the playoffs.
Buying out Ritchie is unlikely, since the cap savings are negligible. Finding a trade partner is the more likely route, with Calgary and Anaheim said to be interested, though the Leafs might need to throw in a sweetener, like a prospect or draft pick and/or retaining some of Ritchie’s salary.
In one light, keeping the underachieving Ritchie around for the first half of the season has come with more costs than just the salary cap space he consumes. Not only did the Leafs initially lose Brooks to waivers (he went to Montreal, then to Vegas) because there was no room on the Leaf roster, but they also lost Michael Amadio to waivers (he went to Vegas and signed an extension) and then allowed Kirill Semyonov to return to Russia (he’s on Russia’s Olympic team at the moment).
All three centres would have given Keefe more roster flexibility, but the investment in Ritchie was too high to give up on him too soon.