SotasicA
Registered User
- Aug 25, 2014
- 8,489
- 6,405
If they really care about human rights, like they say they do.
So trueIf they really care about human rights, like they say they do.
If they really care about human rights, like they say they do.
So true
It seems that nobody cares about what happens in China
Crimea riverI would actually think it would be awesome if the democratic world boycott the whole thing. Send a message.
Enjoy your gold Putin, noone in the free world care.
If they really care about human rights, like they say they do.
The USA went to the Olympics in Germany prior to the outset of World War 2 and we kicked some Nazi ass. The NHLers have a chance to do something similar in Beijing, even if the Chinese won't be playing hockey, and they can hopefully showcase the freedoms we have in the Western World to the Chinese populace. Sure that's idealistic, but it fits in line with the original goals of the modern Olympic Games.
In reality the 1936 games were wildly successful for Hitler, and remain one of his most durable peacetime legacies to this day.
That Jesse Owens story has been remaining iconic since then for all, who hate nazism and racism, though. It's way more important, than Hitler's advantagies from the Olympics' success, because those advantagies didn't help Hitler a lot to survive the shit he brought to the world.
I ain't saying, this can somehow be connected to the Chinese Olympics, though. Because it looks like Chinese support their government en masse right now, and those talks about human rights mean nothing. As far as I remember, American didn't protest a lot against their rights' violation during counter-terrorist measures after 9/11, so why Chinese should, if it makes their lives better?