NEW: Mega Mailbag 2: What Should Sharks Do With No. 2 Pick? | Page 37 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

NEW: Mega Mailbag 2: What Should Sharks Do With No. 2 Pick?

Should Sharks be looking at Ekblad/Provorov as free agents? I agree Grier needs some better and more experienced D in house. Whether its via free agency or trade... But no idea who they could trade for so I'll stick with the two i mention...
 
  • Like
Reactions: gaucholoco3
Should Sharks be looking at Ekblad/Provorov as free agents? I agree Grier needs some better and more experienced D in house. Whether its via free agency or trade... But no idea who they could trade for so I'll stick with the two i mention...
Of course they should. I think Ekblad is definitely better and while Provorov isn’t very good he’d still be at worst our third best D (if Shak takes a big step). The bigger question is why would either of those guys look at SJ.
 
Of course they should. I think Ekblad is definitely better and while Provorov isn’t very good he’d still be at worst our third best D (if Shak takes a big step). The bigger question is why would either of those guys look at SJ.
Money.

I think the Sharks can out bid others by a large margin. I know it might not be great in 5 years but I would go as high as 7x$10 million for Ekblad. I think he would be the perfect steady defensive #2 for the first 4 years and a #4 for the last 3 years.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: 209 and Sandisfan
Grier said quite clearly that he is not giving anyone any term (5+ yrs). Unless he changes his mind, I think he will stick to that. The long term D consists of Mukh, Dick, and hopefully Schaefer, with an outside chance of adding LSW, Pohlkamp, and/or Cagnoni. This means that he will likely try to acquire a top 4 D 25 or younger (preferably 23 or younger) who fits in the roster for the next 10 years. I don't think term and $$ for a 28-30 year old is coming, as much as I wish he did. The only UFA adds on D are likely to be depth guys (perbix =like), or veterans on short term deals. While this strategy sure surely suck next year (and likely the year after), a Long term top four of Schaefer, Dick, Dobson, and Mukh (with Pohlkamp and Perbix filling it out on RHD) is likely to be a top-of-the-league D in due course.

6'2, 6'3, 6'4, 6'4, 6'4, and 5'11, all eventually 200lb+.

Hopefully Bystedt can be the 3C (I hae zero faith in ostapchuk). Then, its just a matter of filling out the wings, which is usually quite doable with a combo of vets and rookie grads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Grier said quite clearly that he is not giving anyone any term (5+ yrs).
Not exactly. Last year he said he wasn't going to go beyond 4. This year, he said he'd likely want to stay around 5, but he didn't shut the door on longer term as hard as he did last year. What he did say is he wouldn't "go crazy, sign 3 guys to 7x9 and two of them don't work out and you're stuck with buyers remorse."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jargon
Should Sharks be looking at Ekblad/Provorov as free agents? I agree Grier needs some better and more experienced D in house. Whether its via free agency or trade... But no idea who they could trade for so I'll stick with the two i mention...
I think Ekblad is worth a look but I'm expecting a 7x8 with a practically full NMC to convince him to come here. Provorov is just someone the team should avoid. I just don't think he's very good or would be a good fit. I think the team will probably target Fabbro. I think beyond that is anyone's guess.
 
Should Sharks be looking at Ekblad/Provorov as free agents? I agree Grier needs some better and more experienced D in house. Whether its via free agency or trade... But no idea who they could trade for so I'll stick with the two i mention...
Watching Gavrikov in these playoffs I'm ready to give him a blank check (okay, keep it under $10M AAV).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 209
Watching Gavrikov in these playoffs I'm ready to give him a blank check (okay, keep it under $10M AAV).
Gavrikov and Ekblad are my top 2 D targets. I prefer Ekblad for handedness. Signing Gavrikov would likely mean 4 LH D in the top 4 and Liljegren as the only RH D that should be playing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 209
Gavrikov and Ekblad are my top 2 D targets. I prefer Ekblad for handedness. Signing Gavrikov would likely mean 4 LH D in the top 4 and Liljegren as the only RH D that should be playing.
My only concern with Ekblad is his injury history. Otherwise I agree he'd be a better fit although Gavrikov has some experience playing the right side too.
 
Grier said quite clearly that he is not giving anyone any term (5+ yrs). Unless he changes his mind, I think he will stick to that. The long term D consists of Mukh, Dick, and hopefully Schaefer, with an outside chance of adding LSW, Pohlkamp, and/or Cagnoni. This means that he will likely try to acquire a top 4 D 25 or younger (preferably 23 or younger) who fits in the roster for the next 10 years. I don't think term and $$ for a 28-30 year old is coming, as much as I wish he did. The only UFA adds on D are likely to be depth guys (perbix =like), or veterans on short term deals. While this strategy sure surely suck next year (and likely the year after), a Long term top four of Schaefer, Dick, Dobson, and Mukh (with Pohlkamp and Perbix filling it out on RHD) is likely to be a top-of-the-league D in due course.

6'2, 6'3, 6'4, 6'4, 6'4, and 5'11, all eventually 200lb+.

Hopefully Bystedt can be the 3C (I hae zero faith in ostapchuk). Then, its just a matter of filling out the wings, which is usually quite doable with a combo of vets and rookie grads.

I think Grier walked back the term comment slightly. I took that to mean, we'll be sticking with 2-4 years with the unlikely but possible exception of pursuing Marner and Ekblad/Gavrikov.

So your 'preferably 23 and younger' got me thinking. How many RHD played 17+ minutes and 15+ games this year? The answer is 70 including Jan Rutta, Travis Hamonic, Jeff Petry, Erik Gudbranson, and Trevor van Riemsdyk- none of whom I'd be keen to bring in. Rizel, Levshunov, Brunicke, and Parekh also averaged more than 18 but in fewer games. These guys, Crevier, Seider, Raddysh, and Faber are the rare sub-25 inclusions. Aside from Crevier (who's hardly proven top 4, I don't see any being available. Clarke, Nemec may very well get there, but I don't see either being available.

He 'benefits' from being in SJ, but Liljigren is 48th. Ceci also benefited at 25th. There are a few left shot guys who play right that are excluded, but they're pretty rare.

Near the top of the list (top 18) are soft offenseman Kris Letang (in broken form), Karlsson, and Tony Deangelo. Current or soon to be $9M+ dmen with warts on he list include Bouchard, Dobson, and Jones.

RHD options are dire. Guys who might be available by minutes played (and ranked). I didn't account for NTCs, which is several, but bolded the under 28 crowd.

7. Andersson- 24:10 (UFA next year, hoping to extend)
13. Ekblad- 23:30 (UFA)
14. Bouchard- 23:28 (Must decide to commit $9-10M)
16. Dobson- 23:16 (Widely discussed)

18. Karlsson 23:14 (honestly, I'd be game!)
20. Faulk- 22:27 (2 years left, probably not available)
25. Ceci- 21:13 (UFA)
28. Pulock- 21:05 (Cap reduction?)
29. Burns- 20:57 (UFA)
30. Fabbro- 20:54 (UFA)
31. Myers- 20:48 (Rebuild?)
34. Murphy- 20:37 (UFA next year)
37. Risto- 20:31 (tank? Philly wanted 1st+)
44. Hamilton- 19:51 (5 RHD options)
49. Sverson- 19:30 (Cap reduction, team fit?)
55. Manson- 18:02 (UFA next year)
25. Ceci- 21:13 (UFA)
53. Peeke- 18:36 (tank?)
57. Jokiharju- 17:50 (UFA)
66. Crevier- 17:17 (lot's of RHD, but I think they'd move Murphy instead)

70. Mayfield- 17:00 (cap move?)

So, back up the brinks truck for Ekblad, and try and bring back Ceci or Perbix (not included with under 15:00 a night, but young)!
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad