rangers5000
Registered User
- Apr 30, 2012
- 509
- 0
how much longer can they leave st louis/nash together
time to break them up
what should be the lines
time to break them up
what should be the lines
they need to split st louis and nash up imo
its not working and both are stronger on the right side
one has to go with richards
how much longer can they leave st louis/nash together
time to break them up
what should be the lines
Hags-Step-Zooks
Pou-Brass-MSL
JT-Richards-Nash
The Pou-Brass-Zucc line had their worst game of the playoffs and possibly the year last night. I still wouldn't break them up since they're the most consistent line overall offensively.
JT Miller can go get ****ed right now. How many times do we need to insert him into the lineup and see he's not working, only to pull him out again? Seriously? It's getting old.
Also not a fan of breaking up the Brassard line. We need to find a way to get Nash back on RW. Not having Kreider right now is having such an underrated giant butterfly effect on this team.
Before Kreider:
Pouliot - Brassard - Zucc
Carcillo - Richie - MSL
Hagelin - Stepan - Nash
DD - Moore - Boyle
After Kreider:
Kreider - Stepan - Nash
Hagelin - Richie - MSL
Pouliot - Brassard - Zucc
DD/Carcillo - Moore - Boyle
(Not going to turn this thread into a DD v. Carbomb discussion. Put whoever in there your heart desires).
JT has like 2 points in 2 games for a team that has scoring issues. He also brings younger fresher legs. You thought he played badly in the playoff games he was in?
Kreider-Step-Zooks was a very good line for many games. Zooks plays well with both Step and Hag. My lines did get Nash back on the RW.