Yes this was my pointYea exactly, which was Makar.
At least it’s consistent
Yes this was my pointYea exactly, which was Makar.
And by a mile too. MacKinnon was not scary in the Finals. Makar was.Yea exactly, which was Makar.
He’s a weird Knights/Avs hybrid. Truly a disgusting creature.Mackinnon is a lesser player than Claude Provost and will never catch up to him(9 cups), got it
I expect nothing from Vegas Fans but your logic still disappoints me
Messier has 6 cups.How many Cups does MacKinnon have?
How many Cups does McDavid have?
Until he catches up, he will be lesser than. Cups matter bro.
Messier has 6 cups.
Gretzky has 4 cups.
This argument just doesn't work. By this kind of logic, Mark Messier is greater than Wayne Gretzky because he has more cups.
Even if McDavid doesn't win a cup in Edmonton, I'd say the chances of him winning a cup on another team later in his career is extremely high. The greats normally find a way. Lots of people thought Ovechkin was a loser too before he eventually got his cup.
Dude is trolling for sure , I prefer drive by trolls than the ones ripping paragraphs for 10 pages though , hurts my brainMcDavid is the first forward to win a Conn Smythe in a losing effort in 50 years. Are we really trying to argue that his playoff performance is anything short of stellar?
Takes a team. I don't care if McDavid never wins a Cup - his greatness is solidified.
Still. Based on this season I take Mack over McDavid.McDavid is the first forward to win a Conn Smythe in a losing effort in 50 years. Are we really trying to argue that his playoff performance is anything short of stellar?
Takes a team. I don't care if McDavid never wins a Cup - his greatness is solidified.
Man i wish I had the object permanence of a goldfish.Still. Based on this season I take Mack over McDavid.
Over all..... a coin toss.
The Cup club starts at 1. 1/2/5/9 are all the same when comparing to 0.Messier has 6 cups.
Gretzky has 4 cups.
This argument just doesn't work. By this kind of logic, Mark Messier is greater than Wayne Gretzky because he has more cups.
Even if McDavid doesn't win a cup in Edmonton, I'd say the chances of him winning a cup on another team later in his career is extremely high. The greats normally find a way. Lots of people thought Ovechkin was a loser too before he eventually got his cup.
As were Gretz and OV career .Man i wish I had the object permanence of a goldfish.
Also MacKinnon is an empty net merchant this year.
Bourque is still loved by Bs fans and Management.The Cup club starts at 1. 1/2/5/9 are all the same when comparing to 0.
Im obviously with you that Gretzky > Messier. But lets pretend Gretzky never won a Cup, had his 2800 whatever points. It would be a never-ending talking point that he never won it all despite a million points, Harts, and Art Ross's.
Its just the way it is and that is where McDavid finds himself. He is young enough that we all assume he has time and will get it sooner than later, but every year that is going to creep up to be more and more of a topic.
MacKinnon has his. He has his Hart and Lindsay. He can sit back and relax now and he is immortal in Colorado. McDavid needs to win one In Edm and if he doersnt, Oilers fans will be a little sour on him if he wins elsewhere.
Same with Sid. Lets pretend he never won in Pittsburgh, left and won elsewhere. He would be booed. Now, Pens fans will cheer for whatever team he goes to because he is immortal in Pittsburgh. Connor doesnt have that yet. He could easily pull a Tavares next season and it will get ugly fast.
Yeah if McDavid leaves the Oilers 10 years from now to win the Cup, all good, go Connor.As were Gretz and OV career .
All the best scorers rack them up.
Bourque is still loved by Bs fans and Management.
But I get ya. The Cup is the cherry on top when the great ones get theirs. OV finally got one after what 14 seasons?
And as good as we all know he is.....he was immediately plaved in even higher regard after winning the Cup. So will McDavid.
on 13th season.OV finally got one after what 14 seasons?
Why Ovi? He is not top empty net merchant.As were Gretz and OV career. All the best scorers rack them up.
# | Player | ENP/GP |
1 | Mikko Rantanen | .086 |
2 | Jake Guentzel | .085 |
3 | Sebastian Aho | .081 |
4 | Kyle Connor | .079 |
5 | Mark Scheifele | .068 |
6 | Connor McDavid | .068 |
7 | Matthew Tkachuk | .066 |
8 | Nathan MacKinnon | .064 |
9 | Nikita Kucherov | .063 |
10 | Leon Draisaitl | .062 |
11 | Sidney Crosby | .062 |
12 | Brad Marchand | .062 |
13 | Blake Wheeler | .061 |
14 | Artemi Panarin | .060 |
15 | Wayne Gretzky | .057 |
16 | Bryan Rust | .056 |
17 | Zach Hyman | .052 |
18 | Alexander Ovechkin | .051 |
19 | Jonathan Marchessault | .050 |
20 | Teuvo Teravainen | .049 |
21 | David Pastrnak | .049 |
22 | Mario Lemieux | .048 |
23 | Gabriel Landeskog | .047 |
24 | Vincent Trocheck | .047 |
25 | Jaden Schwartz | .046 |
OV and Gretz have the most ENG's.on 13th season.
Why Ovi? He is not top empty net merchant.
Top 25 by ENP per game (among top 100 by total ENP)
# Player ENP/GP 1Mikko Rantanen .086 2Jake Guentzel .085 3Sebastian Aho .081 4Kyle Connor .079 5Mark Scheifele .068 6Connor McDavid .068 7Matthew Tkachuk .066 8Nathan MacKinnon .064 9Nikita Kucherov .063 10Leon Draisaitl .062 11Sidney Crosby .062 12Brad Marchand .062 13Blake Wheeler .061 14Artemi Panarin .060 15Wayne Gretzky .057 16Bryan Rust .056 17Zach Hyman .052 18Alexander Ovechkin .051 19Jonathan Marchessault .050 20Teuvo Teravainen .049 21David Pastrnak .049 22Mario Lemieux .048 23Gabriel Landeskog .047 24Vincent Trocheck .047 25Jaden Schwartz .046
MacK has only 1 ENG, but he is on the top by ENP (this season). So that talk was about points.OV and Gretz have the most ENG's
yea its not like a Domi or Armia are racking up empty netters.I never understood the knock on players getting empty net points, the coach trusts the players to play in those situations for a reason, if they score (to usually put the game away, there is some situations where that isn't always true), even better
This is the most delusional comment I’ve seen on here for a long time. You’re wrong in so many ways it’s not worth breaking down. When McDavid goes down as a universal top 5 player of all time and MacK is sitting outside the top 50 I hope you keep this same energy crying to the 90% public, because you sir, are the minorityYep. And the fact is McDavid was pointless in both game 7s last year, one against Vancouver and one against Florida. The rest of the Edm team was good enough to win against Vancouver but not good enough to win against Florida.
Also, the fact is that MacKinnon isn't some scrub, to no one's surprise he won the Hart last year (over a healthy McDavid I might add) in no small part because he has more dimensions to his game. The fact is McD is a better player than someone like RNH or Warren Foegele, but MacK is arguably at the same level or potentially slightly better (hence this thread).
You can keep going if you want. There is no fact that McD is the ideal person that everyone would pick in a 7 game series. What you have is a feeling, same as @PaulD. The way I feel, if McD were really that good, he would've scored a couple of points in game 7 and Edmonton would've had a cup parade. At least so far, he hasn't able to get it done.
For what it's worth, I really do hope he does sometime. But until then, it's completely reasonable to prefer a different player who provides about the same level of offense, is likely a better dressing room leader, and has also factually gotten it done (unlike McD at least so far) all the while having a more complete game
Crazy. Want to start a parade?McDavid just made MacKinnon look silly on the Oilers goal in P1 tonight.
This is the most delusional comment I’ve seen on here for a long time. You’re wrong in so many ways it’s not worth breaking down. When McDavid goes down as a universal top 5 player of all time and MacK is sitting outside the top 50 I hope you keep this same energy crying to the 90% public, because you sir, are the minority
I agree with al of this but McDavid absolutely has a team, a great team. 2nd best player in hockey over the last 4 years, a PPG 1D, a 50 goal scoring winger, a Selke nomiinated PPG 2C...McDavid is the first forward to win a Conn Smythe in a losing effort in 50 years. Are we really trying to argue that his playoff performance is anything short of stellar?
Takes a team. I don't care if McDavid never wins a Cup - his greatness is solidified.