Changing goalposts again. In a comparison of direct talent and who is the better player, why are you considering the cap?
In that case, you’d get more value out of a number of rookies than you would a number of top 20 players.
The fact is, from a talent standpoint, if you remove MacKinnon from the Avs and put McDavid in his place, McDavid has a cup and MacKinnon doesn’t.
Weak argument - again.
Stats have been posted on previous pages showing just how off you are as well. Let me know if I should requote them.
Its ridiculous not to. The team around him wouldnt be there because of the cap, let alone changing history with draft picks.
But ill play your game. Put MacKinnon on the Oilers for all those seasons and
1. Avalanche draft McDavid in 2015 and not Rantanen.
2. McDavid, assuming the same points in 2016 would have got the Avs to the playoffs and likely lost early. In turn they would not have traded Duchene, extended him, and not finished in the running for the lottery pick and thus not drafted Makar.
3. So this would be McDavid, Duchene, and Landeskog likely losing playoff series similar to what Edmonton has done.
4. MacKinnon did not do enough early in his career to change the trajectory of Oilers getting high picks so we can assume they still would have Draisaitl and RNH.
5. Oilers would finally be good enough to make consecutive playoff runs, but the defense and goaltending is still crap so even MacKinnon going off would not win them a Cup.
So in a insane turn of events, nothing has changed, except both are losers in Edmonton.