David Singleton
Registered User
Until I actually see otherwise, I think Weber is the better player. Subban is closer to Josi then Weber for me.
Not picking on you triggrman (not that you care, lol), but I've always found the notion of determining the better player as... mostly senseless. Now, that doesn't mean I don't engage in those debates, but when I truly give it thought, I arrive back at it being senseless.
Firstly, it's so darn hard to pinpoint what you mean by "better". Better at what? Clearing the crease? Sure, Weber was the best at that on the Predators and one of the best in the league. Better at skating with the puck? Uh, no. And we could do this for just about any skill related to the position you'd like (positioning, first pass, etc).
Then there is the role a player has on the team to consider based upon the type of team or strategy the team employed.
And there's the role the team on the ice with him plays. Weber's penchant for just throwing the puck back up the wall- would that reflect as negatively on him if it were Mike Fisher on that fourth line as opposed to Gaustad? Likely not. Same play on Weber's part. In a vacuum, one still looks at the situation and feels like he has better options, but due to the better ability on Fisher's part to win a battle on the halfboards, or be quicker to the puck, than Gaustad, the overall outcome is better.
We haven't even got to the concept of defense itself. That video of Lavy from the USA coaching symposium does a pretty good job of giving Lavy's perspective. Lavy, in very simplified terms, subscribes to the theory that the best defense is a good offense. He wants to have the puck, keep the puck, get it back as soon as possible.
Given that, I can clearly see why Lavy would think that Subban is "better" than Weber. Weber's biggest skill flaw was his inability or lack of desire to drive the play and/or play with the puck. That happens to be the most cherished skill by the current coaching staff.
Eh, it's all subjective, lol.