Proposal: Mtl - Wpg
- Thread starter BenG
- Start date
JetsHomer
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2011
- 10,941
- 3,146
Hunter368
RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
- Nov 8, 2011
- 27,401
- 24,553
Akhurite
Registered User
Hunter368
RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
- Nov 8, 2011
- 27,401
- 24,553
McCarron can play wing or centre (if I recall).....if/when Little is traded we need a 2C to replace him. McCarron could become a big bodied 2/3C.
Juulsen could become a top 4 guy albeit he's wrong handed, not sure if he can play left side or not.
1sr & 2nd Rd picks are nice, even if they are late each round. Pateryn is meh.
Personally I would take McCarron over Juulsen, plus the picks.
dellzor
Bo Horvat's Head
izzy
go
Hunter368
RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
- Nov 8, 2011
- 27,401
- 24,553
Playoffs are unlikely this year between young team and injuries (helps us tank this year). Little has only 1.5 years left before UFA. I wouldn't resign Little to a 4-5 yr deal when he's already will be 30-31 years old. See Ladd in NY.
Last edited:
Tom ServoMST3K
In search of a Steinbach Hero
Hunter368
RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
- Nov 8, 2011
- 27,401
- 24,553
Not sure we could get more, never mind way more.
Ladd got us what was projected as a late 1st and a 3rd line prospect.
McCarron, 1st and 2nd Rd picks is a pretty solid offer (best offer out there, not sure but very solid) IMO.
Last edited:
jacks*
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2013
- 11,311
- 4
Well it's nice to see other Jet fans can look at this without their blinders on.
I did say other.
Evil Little
Registered User
- Jan 22, 2014
- 6,311
- 2,739
Maukkis
EZ4ENCE
- Mar 16, 2016
- 10,721
- 7,597
I'm saying no, and only because of how little depth we have had so far at C. With Petan going to IR (what a surprise), it doesn't look like anyone could potentially break out this year and take over Little's spot. Next year? Maybe, if Roslovic/Petan (or maybe a high draft pick from this year) can force his way into the lineup, but until then, no to trading Little.
Little is a 1C and how many of those are available for a trade every year, exactly?
By 1C you mean Mark Scheifele ? Little is an injured 2C who has 1 3/4 year left on his contract.
So no, you won't get more than 2 1st round pick and a 2nd for him.
Let's breakdown your comment.
Downplay Little. Check.
Upsell your magic beans and unneeded prospect. Check.
Montreal's 1st should be a late one (not all 1st's are equal). McCarron shouldn't be the center piece of a trade for little. A late 2nd? Keep it.
How about starting a "value of" thread for Little? Let's see other teams offers.
Lets break out your comment
Downplay Little. Check. Calling a Little 2C is downplaying him ? Who the **** do you think Little is ? You really think people here thinks Little is a 1C ?
Upsell your magic beans and unneeded prospect. Check. I was just referring to OP proposal. If you're not happy with it its not my problem.
Montreal's 1st should be a late one (not all 1st's are equal). McCarron shouldn't be the center piece of a trade for little. A late 2nd? Keep it. The center piece of the trade is the 1st pick, not Big Mike. And to be honest it doesn't change jack ****.
How about starting a "value of" thread for Little? Let's see other teams offers.
You do that if you want, I couldnt care less.
Lets break out your comment
Downplay Little. Check. Calling a Little 2C is downplaying him ? Who the **** do you think Little is ? You really think people here thinks Little is a 1C ?
Upsell your magic beans and unneeded prospect. Check. I was just referring to OP proposal. If you're not happy with it its not my problem.
Montreal's 1st should be a late one (not all 1st's are equal). McCarron shouldn't be the center piece of a trade for little. A late 2nd? Keep it. The center piece of the trade is the 1st pick, not Big Mike. And to be honest it doesn't change jack ****.
How about starting a "value of" thread for Little? Let's see other teams offers.
You do that if you want, I couldnt care less.
Seems you care enough to respond.
Now, how about that "value of thread"?
Lets break out your comment
Downplay Little. Check. Calling a Little 2C is downplaying him ? Who the **** do you think Little is ? You really think people here thinks Little is a 1C ?
Upsell your magic beans and unneeded prospect. Check. I was just referring to OP proposal. If you're not happy with it its not my problem.
Montreal's 1st should be a late one (not all 1st's are equal). McCarron shouldn't be the center piece of a trade for little. A late 2nd? Keep it. The center piece of the trade is the 1st pick, not Big Mike. And to be honest it doesn't change jack ****.
How about starting a "value of" thread for Little? Let's see other teams offers.
You do that if you want, I couldnt care less.
Little is a low-end #1 C. Think RNH, Plekanec at his peak, Mikko Koivu level. 1 3/4 years left is not a rental.
If all 1sts are equal (since you keep saying 2 1sts like that means something without context), make it Sergachev instead of what's looking like a late pick in 2017 (unless Price gets hurt again).
McCarron is extremely unlikely to ever replace Little. A late 1st is extremely unlikely to ever replace Little. What do the Jets need if they trade Little? His replacement or a very good reason to absolutely wreck their top-6 like losing Little would do. This is neither of those.
