Proposal: Mtl / Det proposal
- Thread starter barrie colts
- Start date
- Status
Why are Havs doing suchna horrible trade?
Petry on his own would fetch a 1st +
Allen at least a 2nd...
Just.. why???
Petry on his own would fetch a 1st +
Allen at least a 2nd...
Just.. why???
ole ole
Registered User
- Oct 7, 2017
- 11,976
- 6,069
Easy pass from the Habs.
We don't need Nedeljkovic
We probably can get a 1st for Petry alone.
Number1RedWingsFan52
Registered User
Detroit passes a 34 year old Jeff Petry doesn't fit our rebuild timeline, I'm not even sure he'd waive to come home to Detroit. And no thanks on Alex Nedeljkovic he's our future Netminder along with Sebastian Cossa. And FYI I got news for you Nedeljkovic on his next contract in 2 years will probably command in the $5,000,000 to $5,500,000 range for 4-5 years you can't afford that on top of the $10,500,000 Carey Price is already making. Neither Petry nor Allen fit our timeline where Nedeljkovic does. This absolutely does nothing for us. This makes us worse not better.
Bouboumaster
Registered User
- Jul 4, 2014
- 10,395
- 8,640
Flyer lurker
Registered User
- Feb 16, 2019
- 9,775
- 12,592
FissionFire
Registered User
This doesn’t really make any sense for Detroit. Players don’t fit their teams timeline.
Hobnobs
Pinko
- Nov 29, 2011
- 9,121
- 2,447
Why would we trade Ned? A top cost controlled goalie for literal garbage we dont need?
Declined, no counter. Ned is a 1A and fits our core, while Petry is 10 years older than our core and signed until he's what, 37/38?
Last edited:
ole ole
Registered User
- Oct 7, 2017
- 11,976
- 6,069
Why would the Habs do it? They can get a better return on Petry and have no need for Nedeljkovic.
- Sep 27, 2017
- 5,617
- 2,956
montreal's answer is no.
Primeau is the future and there are other goalie prospects in the system.
Petry and Allen can be traded for much better returns - especially petry
Debrincat93
Registered User
ole ole
Registered User
- Oct 7, 2017
- 11,976
- 6,069
What would we rather have A goalie we don't need or a 1se rd pick in which we could get for Petry. Easy the pick
I guess we have a different definition of what help is.
Classic Montreal thinking a 34 year old defenseman who has 2 points signed to 3 more years at 6.25m can fetch a 1st+.
danyhabsfan
Registered User
I think folks agree, but dont realize it.
Habs dont do it:
Habs dont do it:
- Low return for Petry. Dont know what is happening in his case (wrong chair, stress, injury? , family life) but he is having a horrid season. Strong skating, solid shot, somewhat physical (was solid defensively?). Still, i expect a better return than Chiarot, who experts seem to think is going to get a 1st. I think he goes to a team going for a stanley cup run that needs a good top 4 D and already has someone filling in the #1 D role.
- Low return Allen is probably the best #2 goalie in the league, and accepts this role. I expect he can fetch a 2nd or more.
- Ned is their future prospect #1G
- Petry doesn't fit a rebuild because of his age and doesnt have the type of leadership you would expect from veterans you put in your aligmnment to support your youth
- Allen may fit in a team that needs a veteran to support a young goaltender. Not sure if Greiss fits this role already though. If a trade for allen were to happen, it would probably include Greiss
Why would Detroit pay assets to acquire Petrys bad contract as a non playoff bound team? This is Terrible for Detroit.
malcb33
Registered User
This makes no sense from either side, but especially the Habs.
Why does Montreal need Nedeljkovic? They're trying to tank this year and they still have Carey Price under contract for several more years.
I find it so funny how short people's memories are on here. Sure, Petry has had an awful season this year on a very poor team, but no one seems to remember his playoff run or regular season just last year (not even mentioning he's been Montreal's best D for years and received Norris consideration). Like it or not, his previous play still holds value, the notion that he's a cap dump after 30 poor games on a bad team is very short-sighted.
It also seems extremely disingenuous that good player's on previously bad teams (like Detriot) had the excuse that they would be better on a good team, but Petry doesn't get that same leniency.
Nedeljkovic isn't going anywhere, and it's not a good deal from a Montreal perspective either. There's no counter, it just doesn't make sense IMO.
Why does Montreal need Nedeljkovic? They're trying to tank this year and they still have Carey Price under contract for several more years.
I find it so funny how short people's memories are on here. Sure, Petry has had an awful season this year on a very poor team, but no one seems to remember his playoff run or regular season just last year (not even mentioning he's been Montreal's best D for years and received Norris consideration). Like it or not, his previous play still holds value, the notion that he's a cap dump after 30 poor games on a bad team is very short-sighted.
It also seems extremely disingenuous that good player's on previously bad teams (like Detriot) had the excuse that they would be better on a good team, but Petry doesn't get that same leniency.
Nedeljkovic isn't going anywhere, and it's not a good deal from a Montreal perspective either. There's no counter, it just doesn't make sense IMO.
- Status
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
-
Roster Building XXII: Too Many Forwards, Hopefully One Cup- Latest: A Star is Burns
