Proposal: MTL & CHI

Ronald Bourgogne

Registered User
Jun 15, 2016
20
4
Jake Allen ($2.9M) and Paul Byron ($3.4M) for M-A Fleury ($7M) and 2023 2nd draft pick.

Allen is the better goalie, with a good contract, but I think Fleury could help turn things around. He could also be signed for less next year as the back-up.
 

Boondock

Registered User
Feb 6, 2009
5,783
2,391
Jake Allen ($2.9M) and Paul Byron ($3.4M) for M-A Fleury ($7M) and 2023 2nd draft pick.

Allen is the better goalie, with a good contract, but I think Fleury could help turn things around. He could also be signed for less next year as the back-up.
I don't see Chicago wanting to extend the cap hit into next season for both Byron and Allen. By the time the contract extensions for Jones and Murphy kick in MAF will be off the books. Allen doesn't improve Chicago, they give up a pick and they spend an additional $6.5 million in actual dollars.
 

Ace Card Bedard

Back in Black, Red, and White
Feb 11, 2012
9,069
4,062
I don't see why Chicago would even entertain this offer.

Fleury comes off the books after this season.
At best the Hawks turn things around and make a playoff push with Fleury/Lankinen as 1a/1b.
At worst Fleury will be a deadline rental for a contender and the Hawks will pick up a later round pick for free.
 

Pile

Registered User
May 5, 2015
398
448
Chicago
Jake Allen ($2.9M) and Paul Byron ($3.4M) for M-A Fleury ($7M) and 2023 2nd draft pick.

Allen is the better goalie, with a good contract, but I think Fleury could help turn things around. He could also be signed for less next year as the back-up.

Why not just keep the better goalie on the better contract then? This comment makes absolutely no sense considering you proposition.
 

jfhabs

Registered User
May 21, 2015
5,142
2,610
Not sure why Chicago is giving the 2nd, if anything it should be coming from the habs IMO.
 

Ronald Bourgogne

Registered User
Jun 15, 2016
20
4
Why not just keep the better goalie on the better contract then? This comment makes absolutely no sense considering you proposition.
Because we won't make the playoffs with Allen for sure, even if Price returns. Fleury is a gamble but he might give us a chance.
 

JayKnowsHockey

Registered User
Nov 27, 2017
96
59
Allen is the better goalie, with a good contract, but I think Fleury could help turn things around. He could also be signed for less next year as the back-up

Since When??
 
  • Like
Reactions: DingDongCharlie

Habs10025

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
3,607
970
Jake Allen ($2.9M) and Paul Byron ($3.4M) for M-A Fleury ($7M) and 2023 2nd draft pick.

Allen is the better goalie, with a good contract, but I think Fleury could help turn things around. He could also be signed for less next year as the back-up.
Montreal reject this trade.
 

Flyer lurker

Registered User
Feb 16, 2019
9,804
12,642
Byron is DOA. Anything you get from him is a gift.
So you are making Allen a 6.3 goalie for 2 years or MAF 7 million for 1.

You have the 2 going in the wrong direction.
 

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
21,601
10,618
Nova Scotia
Jake Allen ($2.9M) and Paul Byron ($3.4M) for M-A Fleury ($7M) and 2023 2nd draft pick.

Allen is the better goalie, with a good contract, but I think Fleury could help turn things around. He could also be signed for less next year as the back-up.
Habs definitely do it. If Fleury turns it around, Habs flip him for another 2nd at deadline
 

Gaud

Registered User
May 11, 2017
1,713
669
Jake Allen ($2.9M) and Paul Byron ($3.4M) for M-A Fleury ($7M) and 2023 2nd draft pick.

Allen is the better goalie, with a good contract, but I think Fleury could help turn things around. He could also be signed for less next year as the back-up.

Sorry guy, this makes no sense to me. If Allen is the better goalie (which i dont think he is) and we have a goalie issue, we should keep allen. Not to mention that spending 17M on a goalie tandem of #1s is insane. If Price were to leave, you bet id love to see Fleury in mtl, but this is a hard pass.
 

beowulf

Not a nice guy.
Jan 29, 2005
59,650
9,185
Ottawa
Imagine giving away a 2nd for no reason...in a draft where you don't even have a 1st...when you're rebuilding
Might want to do some research before you post. It says a 2nd in 2023 and Chicago does indeed have a 1st in 2023. It's next year, 2022, that they don't have a first. This only changes, the years switched, if Chicago wins one of the draft lotteries.
 

CallMeShaft

Registered User
Apr 14, 2014
16,307
22,743
Fleury hasn't been good here so far, but he has gotten zero help.

If the recent Vezina winner looks like a backup behind the Hawks, I can only imagine what Jake Allen would look like. ECHLer possibly?
 

DingDongCharlie

Registered User
Sep 12, 2010
11,690
9,792
Allen is not a better goalie than MAF. That’s ridiculous.

Montreal isn’t trading for a high cap hit goalie.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad