Makes you wonder if, perhaps, the words from above are that they don't want a rebuild. They want to be as competitive as possible, so spend to the cap.
As funny as those moves are, have they/will they stand in the way of the rebuild happening smoothly? Without giving it much though, I'd say probably not. Maybe Eriksson, seeing as he still has 4 years left at $6M.
Yes it's exactly that... or was that. Come Spring when the Canucks are sitting in the basement Linden and Benning are all about this wasn't going to be easy and we have to build for the future, but starting July 1st it's all about being competitive and trying to make the playoffs. I don't have these things saved by there are compile quotes and tweets that show them flip flopping back and forth like this over several years.
I will say that that after 4 inept years it seems they may be finally ready to take more of a 'rebuild' stance this summer... we'll see. And yes while the Canucks have Boeser/Pettersson/Hughes and no one other than maybe Eriksson may really hurt us long term, I think there's still 3 key points here:
1. The last 3 seasons as a Canuck fan from an entertainment perspective have been a complete waste of time
2. While we got the standard top picks as compensation for sucking there are loads of extra rebuild assets we missed while Benning was trying to 'compete'
3. Even if the team drafts well, with how inept the pro roster decisions have been the last 4 years shouldn't that kill any confidence that they could transition out of a rebuild? Eventually you're picks are going to make it or not, and you'll need to get back to pro roster moves to build around them.
Basically for the last 3 seasons the Canucks have spent to the cap and gone into the season aiming for the playoffs... yet have the combined worst record in the league through that span. When for example the Flames were ineptly trying and failing to compete for the playoffs during in Iginla & Kipprusoff's last few seasons there, they were at least finishing at around the 90 point mark and 9th-10th in the West.
While I understand if people but Bergevin or Chiarelli ahead as they have the sexier screw ups on better teams, I still think Benning is the most functionally inept GM in the league. Like if you were to assign GM's ratings like EA does with players in their games, he'd have the lowest OV. In reality it just isn't as visible because rather than killing an already good or an up and coming team he took over the Canucks at the start of a downturn/transition phase so there's no real expectations.