Goal Caufield50
Registered User
- Jul 13, 2007
- 941
- 329
I vote Dach. Next is Newhook followed by Barron. In one year Rienbacker and Slaf could be #1 particularly if Wright and Mitchkov continue to play well.
Dach. We gave up 13th pick in draft and first pick in 3rd round. He's been a disappointmentI vote Dach. Next is Newhook followed by Barron. In one year Rienbacker and Slaf could be #1 particularly if Wright and Mitchkov continue to play well.
Dach was a great acquisition. Injuries have messed it up but that doesn’t change it being a great pickup.I vote Dach. Next is Newhook followed by Barron. In one year Rienbacker and Slaf could be #1 particularly if Wright and Mitchkov continue to play well.
Keep in mind that Baron came with a 2nd. We leveraged that 2nd and another forst to move up and take Hage.Barron is number one, followed by Dach and Newhook. As the first poster mentionned, Slaf and Reinbacher can take the poll position. In the case of Slaf, that 8 year contract will hurt the most.
I can understand the trade for Dach and Barron. I just can't undestand why we traded for Newhook.I would have done all 3 moves of Kirby, Newhook and Barron at the time so I can't fault him for those.
Michkov draft I really didn't like. So I'll go with that.
All moves are still early to tell and I still don't consider them all bad.
Nazar was not in the cards. Habs wanted Dach and Chicago requested to get Isles’ #13 pick.Got to be Dach at this point. It’s nice that he showed flashes two years ago, but it’s not enough. You couldn’t get either Romanov or Nazar for him straight up at this point so it’s a loss.
He was definitely in the cards if we just kept the pick. The trade is a loss. And being good for 1 game isn’t something I’m going to brag about.Nazar was not in the cards. Habs wanted Dach and Chicago requested to get Isles’ #13 pick.
And dach was quite good for the Habs when he was healthy before Game #2 last season.
A GM with zero experience. Just like his coach.Time will tell - never liked Wright anyways but yeah.. there will always be some disappointing moves no matter what GM is in charge. I think everyone put Kent on some pedestal like he was some genius, truth is he's just another GM with a plan that may or may not work.