No, I'll put it in terms you can actually understand (which you should sensibly deduct yourself)...most of the acquisitions made are kids and they need time. Period. Not rocket science. You'll only know in a couple of years if they were bad moves. It's simple really.
No, I'll put it in terms you can actually understand (which you should sensibly deduct yourself)...most of the acquisitions made are kids and they need time. Period. Not rocket science. You'll only know in a couple of years if they were bad moves. It's simple really.
The thread is called "Most disappointing HUGHES acquisition". Stop posting in a heard mentality, you're better than that.Geez you're right, wtf are we doing here then, we should all stop posting and come back in........
When can we come back Monsieur Larose......3-4 years is ok with you
The thread is called "Most disappointing HUGHES acquisition". Stop posting in a heard mentality, you're better than that.
Yeah and? I never said not discussing MM, it's the nuts always bringing up when he even goes for a shit. "Oh, look at that shit, we missed out, it's beautiful and long". If he's all we're discussing, and is the only disappointment, might as well close the thread with that title! It's not the MM appreciation threadYou forgot a small part of the title
(All Michkov draft talk here)
My pointBT? People not even cluing in that this wasn't a HuGo pick? That is what I mean about this fanbase. Not dealing in reality and facts.
Yup...Yeah and? I never said not discussing MM, it's the nuts always bringing up when he even goes for a shit. "Oh, look at that shit, we missed out, it's beautiful and long". If he's all we're discussing, and is the only disappointment, might as well close the thread with that title! It's not the MM appreciation thread
My point
Move on from michkov already
I only mentioned Bobrov and his father within the very narrow construct of their privileged access to intel at the time, which constituted an advantage.Just because the Habs had a Russian scouting director and a relative in a senior role of the team Michkov played for - does not prove their competence on the subject.
I only mentioned Bobrov and his father within the very narrow construct of their privileged access to intel at the time, which constituted an advantage.
I never claimed anything about their competency — you made that call.
Suffice to say that even the most competent of scouting people will get assessments wrong. Maybe other factors came into play that swayed their decision and were not made public — regardless, it still led to what now looks like a blunder.
The extra layer here is how they were unable to successfully convert on the advantage they had and how that might irk some fans.
Michkov chatter should be in the Out Of Town Thread..................he is NOT our prospect and is not a Hughes acquisition.You forgot a small part of the title
(All Michkov draft talk here)
Ya I know good point27pts in 27gp, as a rookie.
He would be 2nd in scoring on our team, just 2pts behind Suzie Q.
You would think he has a 10m contract with comments like this one lol. He’s on a potential 2nd consecutive season of 50 points at 19 and 20 years old. He has the contract of a top 6 player.Honestly Slaf contract might be up there with the Reinbacher selection if he doesn’t pick it up
He wouldn't have scored that many on this team... nobody scores that many points on this putrid team27pts in 27gp, as a rookie.
He would be 2nd in scoring on our team, just 2pts behind Suzie Q.