Perennial
Registered User
- Jun 27, 2020
- 3,492
- 1,523
I wouldn't be giving up significant assets for Kessel at this point.
There's more to the trade than just a "significant asset" for Kessell
Calgary is also dumping Lucic's contract...
I wouldn't be giving up significant assets for Kessel at this point.
I wouldn't retain on Kessel AND take Lucic at full pop for three years. I'd consider Demers at 50%, which would still net the Flames a bit of cap savings in the deal.Kessel at 5M, Demers at 50%
Lucic, Bennett, Zary, 2nd 21, 3rd 22
I wouldn't retain on Kessel AND take Lucic at full pop for three years. I'd consider Demers at 50%, which would still net the Flames a bit of cap savings in the deal.
Calgary is also dumping Lucic's contract...