Proposal: Montreal - Minnesota

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Prairie Habs

Registered User
Oct 3, 2010
12,143
13,147
No thanks. Makes zero sense to sell Dvorak that low when he hasn't even had a chance to play since DD was fired.
 

Obvious Fabertism

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 1, 2009
6,327
3,751
MN
McBain and Rask would roughly even out to be neutral value, so that extra + better be significant.
Rask doesn't have negative value to the Wild, he is an expiring UFA and the Wild have loads of cap room this year, they would not be paying anything to get rid of him. Not to say that he has value to MTL, but the Wild would just exclude him from any deal than treat him as a negative asset is the point.
 

Joseph Nathan

Registered User
Feb 11, 2022
753
340
No, we aren't trading greenway. We aren't trading for a player in Dvorak whose not better than what we have and hasn't played one game since January 26 due to head injury
 

Natey

GOATS
Sponsor
Aug 2, 2005
62,520
8,860
No, we aren't trading greenway. We aren't trading for a player in Dvorak whose not better than what we have and hasn't played one game since January 26 due to head injury
Not commenting on the deal, but do you even look stuff up before posting? He was literally playing less than 12 hours ago.
 

Mersss

Registered User
Jul 12, 2014
4,996
2,188
Dvorak and Greenway similar value
Poehling and McBain... HUGE risk for MTL considerign the guy is a UFA on Aug 31st
AND Habs send a pick for Rask as a cap dump?

WHY???
 
  • Like
Reactions: DiglettDangles

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad