Vachon23
Registered User
Stu Cowen said in the sick podcast couple weeks ago that Trevor Letowski have a young family and he could look to comeback closer to home.
We could look for guys who will be here long term. Gally, Anderson, Armia, Dvo, won't be here when we're ready to contend.Again, my point doesn't change.
We don’t need more bottom 6 players, we need upgrades on what we currently have.
Therefore, if you're trading Harris for a bottom 6 guy, he needs to be a clear upgrade on what we already have.
That doesn't matter in trades involving waiver eligible players as the limiting factor is current roster space, not imaginary roster make up years from now.We could look for guys who will be here long term. Gally, Anderson, Armia, Dvo, won't be here when we're ready to contend.
The future core depth chart is something like:
Caufield Suzuki Slaf
------- Dach ------
Newhook Kapanen/Beck Roy
Xhekaj kapanen/Beck Evans/Heineman/Tuch/RHP/Ylonen/Farrell/Mesar/Davidson
Trying to find a coaching job in Ontario probably. Maybe even ass. coach with the Leafs since they have an opening.Stu Cowen said in the sick podcast couple weeks ago that Trevor Letowski have a young family and he could look to comeback closer to home.
Stu Cowen said in the sick podcast couple weeks ago that Trevor Letowski have a young family and he could look to comeback closer to home.
I can’t watch us play 1-3-1With Guy Boucher suddenly being available, if Letowski decides to leave I'd see a pretty easy fit there, unless MSL has someone specific in mind that he's already close with.
MSL is still in charge, no worries there Boucher can handle the PP and set plays, Robidas keeps defense and the PK, Burrows can go get coffee for the boys. Easy peasy.I can’t watch us play 1-3-1
MSL is still in charge, no worries there Boucher can handle the PP and set plays, Robidas keeps defense and the PK, Burrows can go get coffee for the boys. Easy peasy.
Well I mean he went to ECF in 1st season with OTT.No thanks - Boucher did a terrible job with the Leafs powerplay, and has generally not been good in any capacity since his initial introduction to the NHL.
Well I mean he went to ECF in 1st season with OTT.
I mean he did it twice so it's a little harsh to compare him to Ducharme who pulled a Dan Bylsma.Ducharme went to the cup finals, too. Fluke years are an aberration.
I mean he did it twice so it's a little harsh to compare him to Ducharme who pulled a Dan Bylsma.
Wasn't their PP top 5 in the league or close to it?No thanks - Boucher did a terrible job with the Leafs powerplay, and has generally not been good in any capacity since his initial introduction to the NHL.
Wasn't their PP top 5 in the league or close to it?
Don’t think MSL is a big fan of Guy BoucherWith Guy Boucher suddenly being available, if Letowski decides to leave I'd see a pretty easy fit there, unless MSL has someone specific in mind that he's already close with.
Don’t think MSL is a big fan of Guy Boucher
One name I would watch is Jay Pandelfo
Pandolfo seems pretty content to stay close to home in Boston, but who knows, he might be interested.Don’t think MSL is a big fan of Guy Boucher
One name I would watch is Jay Pandelfo
Not sure MSL would take Boucher anyway. I remember Boucher saying bad things about MSL "no-system" concepts before he was hired by the Leafs.I don't see Boucher being a good fit because he's always been a guy who wants to do things his way, it doesn't seem likely that he will truly buy into MSL's concepts system. And even if special teams might be the primary responsibility of a given assistant coach, it's never limited to just that.
He got connections with both Hughes and Gorton (coach their kids), I think he would feel confortable herePandolfo seems pretty content to stay close to home in Boston, but who knows, he might be interested.
I always found him to be a good salesperson but not a very apt coach.Pascal Vincent could be a candidate too, played in the same organization then MSL in minor hockey and would bring a lot of experience