Budz
Registered User
- Jan 28, 2013
- 2,210
- 2,740
Could an NHL Team proactively choose to operate in 2 cities?
Similar to the islanders splitting time in different arenas?Could an NHL Team proactively choose to operate in 2 cities?
Could an NHL Team proactively choose to operate in 2 cities?
Not really.....they are only operating in one city. The Senators used to operate in the City of Kanata, but didn't operate in Ottawa, so only one city....but Kanata has been a suburb of Ottawa since 2001 (no longer a separate city).Oh sure, happens all the time. The Kanata Senators, the Glendale Coyotes, the Raleigh-Durham Hurricanes...
For the young 'uns in the crowd, perhaps the OP is referring to the two seasons where the Montreal Expos played a portion of their home games in Puerto Rico.Why would anyone do it? I mean would it benefit that team in any way?
I had season tickets that season. You couldn’t give away those tickets to Barclays if you tried. Arena was terrible and an awful decision by the franchise.Similar to the islanders splitting time in different arenas?
Where I am going with this - could a really rich team like Toronto play out of Toronto and a warm climate state like Florida or Arizona.
This whole living in a warm climate is a huge factor with free agents and the whole tax benefits.
Toronto will sell out with amount of snow bird fans we have.
Is there any rule stopping us from doing this?
I actually think this is a positive for the players. One city for the wife and one for the side piece / 2nd familyPA would never allow it. Would the players and their families keep a separate home in each city?