Which player do you take for the future?
Brady Tkachuk 8,20 million to 27/28
Mitch Marner 10,9 million to 24/25
Brady Tkachuk 8,20 million to 27/28
Mitch Marner 10,9 million to 24/25
Last edited:
Yes bad idea.Better to have the poll with the salaries they have now maybe a mod can change the topic to for the future.Marner is the better player, so there's no reason not to take him if you can get them on equal salaries and cap hits.
I wouldnt take Marner at even money he's soft perimeter and regresses in the playoffs. But he also makes way more money and doesnt add any leadership whatsoever.Marner is the better player, so there's no reason not to take him if you can get them on equal salaries and cap hits.
Ok let’s not be ridiculous. Tkachuk can’t put up 90+ points and 65+ assists a year. Having said that he probably also won’t lay eggs in a series like Marner, he could considering he can’t even make it, but his style should be effective when he does.Tkachuk, easily, and that really shouldn't be controversial at all.
Anything Marner can do, Tkachuk can do, on a 6ft4 beast of a frame.
Tkachuk, easily, and that really shouldn't be controversial at all.
Anything Marner can do, Tkachuk can do, on a 6ft4 beast of a frame.
I wouldnt take Marner at even money he's soft perimeter and regresses in the playoffs. But he also makes way more money and doesnt add any leadership whatsoever.
Ok let’s not be ridiculous. Tkachuk can’t put up 90+ points and 65+ assists a year. Having said that he probably also won’t lay eggs in a series like Marner, he could considering he can’t even make it, but his style should be effective when he does.
Tkachuk is a beast of a power forward and good for ~75 points a year, that is incredibly valuable, but we are comparing different type of players so they have their own strengths and weaknesses
Tkachuk isn't lacking in the puck skills department, and definitely has the better shot over Marner. Tkachuk should hit 40 goals this year.Lol. That's just not true. I don't think Tkachuk has the puck skills or the vision or playmaking ability of Marner.
Tkachuk, easily, and that really shouldn't be controversial at all.
Anything Marner can do, Tkachuk can do, on a 6ft4 beast of a frame.
Tkachuk, easily, and that really shouldn't be controversial at all.
Anything Marner can do, Tkachuk can do, on a 6ft4 beast of a frame.
Marner played 19:50 per gameMarner plays an extra two minutes per game over Tkachuk, which definitely helps with Marner's point totals.
Marner is the better playmaker, there is no debate there, he is a top 10 forward in terms of playmaking. Tkachuk is maybe top 60? Just look at the passes they make that result in goals and the ones that they make which results in chances.Tkachuk isn't lacking in the puck skills department, and definitely has the better shot over Marner. Tkachuk should hit 40 goals this year.
Tkachuk is actually a very underrated passer and is typically the guy setting up his teammates on his line with Stutzle and Giroux. Sure, Tkachuk might not have the "dipsy-doodles" that Marner demonstrates, but I find those are more flash than actual results with Marner, and he routinely flubs them when it comes to actually burying the puck. Tkachuk isn't lacking in the ability to deke someone out of their joke strap either mind you.
Marner plays an extra two minutes per game over Tkachuk, which definitely helps with Marner's point totals. All the while too Marner has been playing on a (much) stronger team over the course of their respective careers, so I'm not putting that much weight into the discrepancy between their point totals, at least, over the last couple of years.
Is Marner more creative? Sure, but I don't know how much it actually benefits his effectiveness. It sure feels like he is a little TOO creative out there half the time, and that it impacts his chemistry with his linemates.
I went by Dobber Sports which has Marner at 21:17mins in 23-24, and Tkachuk at 19:09mins in 23-24.Marner played 19:50 per game
Tkachuk played 18:20 per game
The difference in time on ice? The 1:26 Marner played per game on the penalty kill.
Tkachuk actually had a higher per game of power play time.
Stop lying.
Check your numbers, before calling someone a liar.Marner played 19:50 per game
Tkachuk played 18:20 per game
Good post.Marner is the better playmaker, there is no debate there, he is a top 10 forward in terms of playmaking. Tkachuk is maybe top 60? Just look at the passes they make that result in goals and the ones that they make which results in chances.
As for goal scoring, that goes to tkachuk since I think he hasn't peaked in terms of goalscoring and agree with the 40 goal prediction, but it's closer than you think. In the past 3 years, marner has 91 in 221 and Tkachuk has 102 in 242, so 11 less goals in 21 less games.
over those three years the linemates for marner are Matthews/Tavares and Bunting/Jarnkrok/Knies vs Girioux and Stutzle which I gather from your post. Marner has the advantage but lets not act like tkachuk is playing beside some bums.
As for ice time, marner spent 143 of his 1468 minutes on the pk as opposed to tkachuks 4 minutes. Take those out and marner plays maybe 10 more seconds a game, so not much going on. In fact one could argue this hurts marner as he has to exhert his energy on playing in a defensive role for those two minutes and exhaust himself on that side of the ice.
So again no, tkachuk doesn't do everything marner does. Marner is the better playmaker, and the better pker.
Marner is the better player, so there's no reason not to take him if you can get them on equal salaries and cap hits.
Due to him falling off if the post season people are forgetting how good he really is. He is 1 of the best PPQB's in the NHL and top level defensively.Better scorer, not sure about better player.