Player Discussion Mitch Marner, Continued

thewave

Registered User
Jun 17, 2011
42,297
12,739
yes I would absolutely love to win a cup

Even if these guys took reasonable contracts. Right now they are matching only the highest comparables or exceeding that.

If they all took a mid to low range based on comparables we are looking at like 5m in savings or so. That 5m gets you a guy like Knies vs not having a guy like Knies.

In the playoffs that's a big deal.
 

francis246

Registered User
Nov 16, 2007
14,655
18,179
And 11.6M in cap space got the Rangers Panarin who is better than Marner.

Not trusting your management to make signings is a different discussion. But like I said earlier, we don't need Marner to lose in the first round. We can do it without him. We're a playoff team without Marner.

At least without him we have the possibility of being better than a 1st round exit team every year.

There isn’t a panarin available though! That’s the whole point of the argument. If one of those top guys was clearly available I think fans and management would seriously be on board. All these agent / teams collude. If there was ANY chance that the leafs had a shot at those guys they’d probably know by now through back channels. It ain’t happening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACC1224

francis246

Registered User
Nov 16, 2007
14,655
18,179
For the big 4 the best thing they could have done for their image considering the lack of playoff success is..

Matthews taking like 12.5m x 4

Nylander saying he was underpaid last time around and taking 10.5m or even 10.9m to match Mitch.

JT should admit he was overpaid or hint at it in a subtle way. Wanting to complete the job and get a cup here and take a 5x5m

Mitch should just take a contract at 11.5m but that won't happen now. Matching Nylander so we can win would save his face big time though. If he matches as a % with Nylander would probably save his face a bit too.

Winning a cup erases all issues. Can we afford the depth to do it? I hope so, the 3 year Cup window is looking very real

I think JT is gonna take like a 4.75 deal. His will be team friendly. Under 5. I think he does the team a solid to stay. I think the Ryan O’Reilly deal is a perfect comparable.
 

thewave

Registered User
Jun 17, 2011
42,297
12,739
It is imperative that we re-sign Marner and Tavares.

Haha.

Marner not so much. That 13 14m could be become ROR JT and part of Knies.

Sorry for the next 3 years I would rather have ROR JT and Knies here. 100% more likely to get a cup with those players

Then you get another 6m to spend on another player with savings from the new JT contract. Suddenly things look up
 

francis246

Registered User
Nov 16, 2007
14,655
18,179
Haha.

Marner not so much. That 13 14m could be become ROR JT and part of Knies.

Sorry for the next 3 years I would rather have ROR JT and Knies here. 100% more likely to get a cup with those players

Then you get another 6m to spend on another player with savings from the new JT contract. Suddenly things look up

You don’t wanna see JT - ROR - Marner reunited?!?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ACC1224

thewave

Registered User
Jun 17, 2011
42,297
12,739
You don’t wanna see JT - ROR - Marner reunited?!?
I think in terms of what would it take to get an almost sure fire shot at the cup. I know we have Tanev and OEL looking good but for how long.

Does 14m Marner get it done in 3 years. Just not sure.
 

thewave

Registered User
Jun 17, 2011
42,297
12,739
A tax expert showed Reinhart would pay 12mil more in taxes here over the length of his contract, same money. Just for context.
Now this is a topic almost all of us agree 100% on. The tax issue needs resolved in the next CBA. Either the govt needs to harmonize pro level athletes or something.

I don't mind if Athletes pay less personally. I feel they make good ambassadors and help promote Canada. Maybe they could make a elite level athlete tax bracket.

5m+ and it kicks in

Under 5m uses standard. There wouldn't be many special cases to deal with by the CRA
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarkKnight

leafs in five

Registered User
Feb 4, 2007
5,322
1,098
engelland
Haha.

Marner not so much. That 13 14m could be become ROR JT and part of Knies.

Sorry for the next 3 years I would rather have ROR JT and Knies here. 100% more likely to get a cup with those players

Then you get another 6m to spend on another player with savings from the new JT contract. Suddenly things look up
imo we should definitely choose the players that make us 100% more likely to win a cup
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: ACC1224 and thewave

Suntouchable13

Registered User
Dec 20, 2003
44,676
20,961
Toronto, ON
I think JT is gonna take like a 4.75 deal. His will be team friendly. Under 5. I think he does the team a solid to stay. I think the Ryan O’Reilly deal is a perfect comparable.

You wait on both of them till the playoffs are done. There's no point in handcuffing yourself with these contracts and no move clauses if this is another one and done in the playoffs. I am sorry. This team has been giving the players what they want, when is enough is enough? Show me something in the playoffs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ToneDog and thewave

ToneDog

56 years and counting. #FireTheShanaClan!
Jun 11, 2017
25,577
24,943
Richmond Hill, ON
You wait on both of them till the playoffs are done. There's no point in handcuffing yourself with these contracts and no move clauses if this is another one and done in the playoffs. I am sorry. This team has been giving the players what they want, when is enough is enough? Show me something in the playoffs.
The Leafs are already prepared to make him a top paid player in the league but from all the smoke, I am guessing Marner wants close to $14m (LOL). Makes me think Kyper played dumb and knows more than he is willing to admit. Based on Marner's last 12 playoff games, I'd pass.
 

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,334
13,565
There isn’t a panarin available though! That’s the whole point of the argument. If one of those top guys was clearly available I think fans and management would seriously be on board. All these agent / teams collude. If there was ANY chance that the leafs had a shot at those guys they’d probably know by now through back channels. It ain’t happening.

How is there not? Until Rantanen is re-signed he's available.
 

ACC1224

Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
Aug 19, 2002
76,868
43,571
There isn’t a panarin available though! That’s the whole point of the argument. If one of those top guys was clearly available I think fans and management would seriously be on board. All these agent / teams collude. If there was ANY chance that the leafs had a shot at those guys they’d probably know by now through back channels. It ain’t happening.
Why would the Rangers ever dream of letting Panarin go with all the success he's delivered there?
 

thewave

Registered User
Jun 17, 2011
42,297
12,739
I would look forward to the reactions here if we swapped out one winger making 12-14m for another

We have a secondary scoring issue and a scoring issue in the playoffs. When the best teams clamp down on our best players, there is nobody else to worry about as a scoring threat. That's why depth matters to winning teams. It's why cap matters. If you don't believe me look at how many series we have won in 8 years.

If we were MTL the fans would be tomato chucking this team last season. The pressure on Dubas and Keefe would have been enormous and tbh. I appreciate MTL fans for their ability to poopoo on their team when need be. Good for them.

Toronto fans will eat shit and ask for more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Suntouchable13

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad