Weird time to waive someone. Trying to free a contract spot/ give him a chance elsewhere?
Well, Schroeder is not under contract.
Like I said earlier.
Smart move. They waive him, and when he passes through then the Wild can then state with certainty at an arbitration hearing that there is no way this guy can argue for a one-way deal from us... when the entire league just passed on his services (for the inconsequential cost of a waiver claim).
Smart move. They waive him, and when he passes through hen the Wild can then state with certainty at an arbitration hearing that there is no way this guy can argue for a one-way deal from us... when the entire league just passed on his services for the inconsequential cost of a waiver claim.
Has this ever happened before?
In a surprise strategical move, the Wild placed the fifth-year left wing on waivers Wednesday in an attempt to resolve a contract dispute with the restricted free agent
http://www.grandforksherald.com/content/minnesota-puts-veilleux-waiversAccording to assistant GM Tom Lynn, the two sides are far apart on a contract. Veilleux wants to work out a long-term deal with the Wild, but he wants a significant pay hike from last year's $595,000 salary because he can become an unrestricted free agent next summer.
"We are far apart in our evaluation and Steph really believes in a higher number," Lynn said. "So here's a way of figuring out who's right: 'If you're right, you'll be taken off waivers and paid your X dollars by another team.'
"If we're right and he goes through waivers, Steph will see nobody claimed him and it might bring the sides together and solve the problem before (Veilleux's) arbitration (hearing Monday)."