Confirmed with Link: Middleton extended (4 years x 4.35M AAV, limited NTC)

Pick one


  • Total voters
    36
  • Poll closed .

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
40,507
18,846
Think the part that bothers me the most is that, he did this last year with three guys (extended a year before he had to), and two of the three had down years, and he didn't even learn the lesson to wait and see how this season goes. Even if you wait til the trade deadline, you're not getting a better deal here. It's one thing to extend them a year early and get a bargain, but he's giving them over market value with trade protection a year early.
 

Wabit

Registered User
May 23, 2016
20,013
4,628
I've type 4 different things and deleted them. So...

3825184b92c9052f2df3e2f4fbe6586d.jpg
 

Circulartheory

Registered User
Apr 22, 2006
6,950
865
Hong Kong

I haaaate this contract so much. This is bad IMO
I dislike it, I don't hate it. Term and AAV is well within reason. I expected 4x4 so going to 4.35 is within margins. 3/10 rating.

But again with the Foligno,Hartman,Zucc contracts, you HAVE to use this NMC/NTC as bargaining chips. You offer them to give players security while obtaining favorable terms in AAV or years.

In normal circumstances, I would be okay with a limited NTC but then go for a 4x3.75. That would be fine. But these aren't normal circumstances because you already got ... 10 players on NMC/NTCs?

That's not even including Boldy/Faber/Rossi. So you essentially have half a team on NMC/NTCs and its not even your 3 of your top 5 players. You CANNOT have a full roster of NTCs.

And you all know I like BG - I love our prospects, I generally like our trades, and I do agree with the style of play (so I like adding Trenin-type of player to team). And I also like the actual terms of most of the deals.

But this disregard of NTC/NMC as nothing is just asinine.
Like any form of business, any business without liquidity is in a dangerous place.
 

Dr Jan Itor

Registered User
Dec 10, 2009
46,690
21,485
MinneSNOWta
Neutral.

Like I said before, I equate this much more to Hartman's contract than to Foligno's and now Trenin's.

Also, I think people think of the 3rd pair too much like the 4th line. The 3rd pair plays, unless you're devoid of NHL talent.
 

Wabit

Registered User
May 23, 2016
20,013
4,628
I dislike it, I don't hate it. Term and AAV is well within reason. I expected 4x4 so going to 4.35 is within margins. 3/10 rating.

But again with the Foligno,Hartman,Zucc contracts, you HAVE to use this NMC/NTC as bargaining chips. You offer them to give players security while obtaining favorable terms in AAV or years.

In normal circumstances, I would be okay with a limited NTC but then go for a 4x3.75. That would be fine. But these aren't normal circumstances because you already got ... 10 players on NMC/NTCs?

That's not even including Boldy/Faber/Rossi. So you essentially have half a team on NMC/NTCs and its not even your 3 of your top 5 players. You CANNOT have a full roster of NTCs.

Well Boldy does get a NTC on his contract, it's just not valid for a couple more years.
Faber and Rossi are on ELCs and not able too have one.
Rossi isn't a top-5 player on the team, there are at least 3 FWDs and 2 d-men better than him.
 

Wild11MN

First round losers
Sponsor
May 28, 2013
13,296
2,036
MN
Think the part that bothers me the most is that, he did this last year with three guys (extended a year before he had to), and two of the three had down years, and he didn't even learn the lesson to wait and see how this season goes. Even if you wait til the trade deadline, you're not getting a better deal here. It's one thing to extend them a year early and get a bargain, but he's giving them over market value with trade protection a year early.
This is a fantastic summary. Fully agree.
 

Circulartheory

Registered User
Apr 22, 2006
6,950
865
Hong Kong
Well Boldy does get a NTC on his contract, it's just not valid for a couple more years.
Faber and Rossi are on ELCs and not able too have one.
Rossi isn't a top-5 player on the team, there are at least 3 FWDs and 2 d-men better than him.
Somewhat fair.
But the point is, everyone has a current or soon-to-be current NMC.

The only players not with one will be Lauko, Trenin, Bogosian, Chisholm and the rookies. I might be missing some. But that isn't what the list should look like.

And these clauses need to get use much better hometown deals if given to non-key players like (key being Boldy or Kaprizov). We didn't get anything for it with all the depth players, and now with Middleton. The AAV was purely market value
 
  • Like
Reactions: AKL

Webster

Zucc's buddy
Sponsor
Nov 7, 2017
5,265
1,984
Guerin is a good man, he likes to hand out these no trade clauses. And fans get more and more frustrated...lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: HobeyBroten

pfunk

Registered User
Jul 1, 2019
213
209
Neutral, but more on the ‘dislike’ side of neutral. Like the player and what he brings but hate that Guerin is always making these deals before they need to be done. I’m fine when you’re getting out ahead of extending guys like Boldy and Faber. But the pair of deals today are certainly not team friendly in the slightest. I get wanting to be “fair” with players but 4x4 would have been more than fair. Now we’re at 4.35x4 plus M-NTC protection. I’m neutral on this deal, but finding myself feeling negative on Guerin. Given him the benefit of the doubt for awhile but he’s losing me.
 

Spurgeon

Registered User
Nov 25, 2014
6,035
1,997
MinneSNOWta
I’ve been a strong critic of Guerin for a while. Never fully agreed with the buyouts & thought he made poor trades.

However, towards the end of the 22-23 season, I really started to envision what an absolute powerhouse this team could be by the 25-26 season. In exactly one year, Guerin has completely shit all over that vision.

$22.1M + NMC/NTCs for Gaudreau, Foligno, Zuccarello, Hartman, Middleton, & Trenin

What the hell is the point of building up a prospect pool if you’re just going to block all of the spots for several years after the dead cap goes away? Was there really not a better way to build around a forward core of Kap, Ek, Boldy, Rossi, Yurov, Ohgren, & Khusnutdinov?

Kap - Ek - Boldy
X - Yurov - X
Ohgren - Rossi - X
X - Khus - X

I don’t even want to look at CapFriendly to see the amount of cap this team would’ve had to play with next offseason. It’s just so unfortunate how Guerin gets attached to his own guys & this “grit” mindset that has done f*** all his entire tenure here.
 

Poacher

Registered User
Oct 15, 2011
140
26
in the woods
If we need to move a few nmc/ntc, we can and we will. Something tells me that if someone gets on the bad side of Billy they will probably be asking for a trade.
 

Dr Jan Itor

Registered User
Dec 10, 2009
46,690
21,485
MinneSNOWta
I’ve been a strong critic of Guerin for a while. Never fully agreed with the buyouts & thought he made poor trades.

However, towards the end of the 22-23 season, I really started to envision what an absolute powerhouse this team could be by the 25-26 season. In exactly one year, Guerin has completely shit all over that vision.

$22.1M + NMC/NTCs for Gaudreau, Foligno, Zuccarello, Hartman, Middleton, & Trenin

What the hell is the point of building up a prospect pool if you’re just going to block all of the spots for several years after the dead cap goes away? Was there really not a better way to build around a forward core of Kap, Ek, Boldy, Rossi, Yurov, Ohgren, & Khusnutdinov?

Kap - Ek - Boldy
X - Yurov - X
Ohgren - Rossi - X
X - Khus - X

I don’t even want to look at CapFriendly to see the amount of cap this team would’ve had to play with next offseason. It’s just so unfortunate how Guerin gets attached to his own guys & this “grit” mindset that has done f*** all his entire tenure here.
Close to $50 million, less whatever Faber, Rossi, Wallstedt and Khusnuts get on their 2nd contracts, and Yurov + Buium's ELCs.

So probably ~$30 million.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurgeon

Jesus comma Brodin

Effing Norris-Byng Brodin
Feb 22, 2013
7,631
3,092
Minnesota
I’ve failed to see what value he brings in any capacity to this team, aside from playing a heavier game than some so I absolutely hate it but that’s probably more on me than anything else.
 

Soldier13Fox

jävlar anamma (f'ing embrace, get with it)
Sponsor
Oct 8, 2013
7,122
3,295
Coon Rapids
I like Middleton quite a bit. Enough to be perfectly fine with the $. Fine with the term. (Kind of) fine that it was done early. But this is the Nmc/ntc that broke the camels back. I'm on the fire Guerin train now.
 

Soldier13Fox

jävlar anamma (f'ing embrace, get with it)
Sponsor
Oct 8, 2013
7,122
3,295
Coon Rapids
I don't think we even know yet how many teams he gets. I wouldn't be sweating a 10 team NTL.
Thanks Doc, you're right... I should prolly take a step back and breath. But still. It's not even necessarily this particular contract, but a culmination of them
 

Obvious Fabertism

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 1, 2009
6,575
3,932
MN
Thanks Doc, you're right... I should prolly take a step back and breathe. But still. It's not even necessarily this particular contract, but a culmination of them
The landscape has changed over the years, there is a legitimate argument for players to make regarding tax differences, especially in a Canada/US trade. 10 team NTCs almost feel like the standard starting point and I do not blame the players a bit for demanding this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sweetnut

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
40,507
18,846
Pesce is a righty so not a position we really need at this time. Don't like the Skjei contract. Hypothetically, a 5.5M LHS Pesce would have been way better than Middleton.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad