I certainly don't EXPECT them to beat Dallas. But with the Cowboys looking very human these last two games, it'll be interesting to see what happens down the stretch.KING OF THE NORTH and second seed right now. The Lions have a legit shot at the number one seed.
Can you smell what the loins are cooking!?
I certainly don't EXPECT them to beat Dallas. But with the Cowboys looking very human these last two games, it'll be interesting to see what happens down the stretch.
I still have the bar at win division --> win one playoff game --> become an actual contender next year (with heavy off season improvement on defense). But it's a lot more fun debating that kinda stuff, versus whether a top five pick is good enough to land an actual difference maker.
KING OF THE NORTH and second seed right now. The Lions have a legit shot at the number one seed.
The only thing that annoys me is you don't put in the teams that you think are the best. You should be putting in the teams that were the best all season. An undefeated Power 5 champion with an incredible resume should go in over Alabama. I get Texas, but not Alabama. They had their chance to go undefeated, but they didn't, plain and simple.
Fun fact 44% of National Champions used a different QB in the Championship game than the first game of the season (CFP era).
Barnes tipped the scales on the whiffed safety. Loved MC/DC's commitment to the aggressive calls and playing for the win. I do not see him as living and dying by playoff seeding. He will take on whomever wherever. He wanted to leave Dallas with a win and not risk losing players in OT and he was willing to lose the game.
Brad Allen. He is the same ref that blew the Chiefs/Packers game earlier in the month and I believe he has another controversial call under his belt. He was trying to save face for blowing another high profile game and was willing to sully Lions reputation to do it.
NFL needs to investigate this guy and come down hard. His blatant fabrication of events cannot be accepted. I am not sure the media lets this one die.
But he wasn't. If they correctly note that he reported, the receiver wasn't covering him and he would be essentially lined up as a tight end instead of a tackle, which is the whole point of reporting. They threw the second flag on Skipper for illegal formation because they said 70 was eligible, but he was lined up in an ineligible spot.Are we really going down that well again with the refs?
1) Take the field goal when you should, and the Lions win.
2) Goff throws where he should - on EITHER interception or on the (third attempt at the) two point conversion - and the Lions win.
3) If Barnes uses fundamental tackling instead of an all time airmail on what should have been a safety, but turned into Dallas' first TD, and the Lions likely win.
Not to mention repeated use of Gibbs on short yardage plays that clearly favor Montgomery's skill set (or throwing a screen pass if you want to make better use of Gibbs). The list goes on.
Overall it was still a very gutsy performance by the road team. But the Lions had half a dozen gaffes purely of their own doing that would've tipped the scales prior to any objections about the officiating. (Not to mention that even without saying Decker didn't report, he was still in an illegal formation.)
Are we really going down that well again with the refs?
1) Take the field goal when you should, and the Lions win.
2) Goff throws where he should - on EITHER interception or on the (third attempt at the) two point conversion - and the Lions win.
3) If Barnes uses fundamental tackling instead of an all time airmail on what should have been a safety, but turned into Dallas' first TD, and the Lions likely win.
Not to mention repeated use of Gibbs on short yardage plays that clearly favor Montgomery's skill set (or throwing a screen pass if you want to make better use of Gibbs). The list goes on.
Overall it was still a very gutsy performance by the road team. But the Lions had half a dozen gaffes purely of their own doing that would've tipped the scales prior to any objections about the officiating. (Not to mention that even without saying Decker didn't report, he was still in an illegal formation.)
Huh? Most of FSU sat out for the NFL draft since this game didn't matter. I think the broadcast said there was only one regular on the defense that was playing.Too bad you are out of the hat eating game!
Exposed! Lol
No, the reality is that Dan Campbell deserves heat for taking aggressive play calling too far. It was VERY bold calling the fake punt. And I can categorize the first time of declining the field goal and getting stuffed on 4th down as discretionary. But then doing it a second time, in the second half, on the road, was outright malfeasance.There are many ways that the Lions could have won the game that they didn’t. There’s many things that Dallas could have done to win the game that they didn’t.
When it comes to officiating screwing the game, it’s usually a discretionary call that could go either way. When an official completely botches the Lions attempt to follow the rules perfectly, when the Lions literally have won the f***ing game legally, and the ref either flat out lies or just flat out doesn’t care enough to pay attention, then yes, it’s worth blaming the officiating.
This is like when Jim Joyce ruined a perfect game. It was likely the very last call of the game and Brad Allen f***ed it up and then blamed a player who didn’t even talk to him.
The reality is that Brad Allen blew the game and cost the Lions a win. The Lions also didn’t play well enough that they were in a position for a ref to cost them a win. Both things can be true
No, the reality is that Dan Campbell deserves heat for taking aggressive play calling too far. It was VERY bold calling the fake punt. And I can categorize the first time of declining the field goal and getting stuffed on 4th down as discretionary. But then doing it a second time, in the second half, on the road, was outright malfeasance.
The Lions are having a fun season, and their head coach deserves a lot of credit for that. But sometimes you really can have too much of a good thing, and he absolutely needs to learn from his mistakes.
I'm not even debating whether they should have gone for the tie versus the win on any of the three attempts. It's that if your strategy is to risk it 100 percent of the time, you're going to have multiple failures, and sometimes that's enough to cost you a game - and there's a sweet spot where you can be bold without being outright reckless.
The core of my argument is not that the refs got the call correct. It's that if you play a game where one bad call costs you the game, you don't deserve to win.Now address the fact that the Lions did everything by the book and won the game in a legal fashion but the officiating plainly botched the final play of the game and literally flipped the result.
I won’t be this outraged of ticky tack discretionary judgement calls because so much happens during the game. But this one is inexcusable from officiating, because your core argument is “the Lions could have played better and won”. Well if officiating can do the core f***ing function of their job, the Lions did so enough to league.
It was so egregious that they have removed Brad Allen’s entire squad from the playoffs.
The core of my argument is not that the refs got the call correct. It's that if you play a game where one bad call costs you the game, you don't deserve to win.
Even with that call you label as egregious, THEY STILL HAD A CHANCE TO WIN. (Technically they had two chances, with the offsides by Parsons.) And Goff yet again under threw a player. So no, that call in and if itself did not cost them the game.
There's nothing wrong with saying the refs botched a play. It just bothers me how often fans (in general, not specifically directed at you) let their own team completely off the hook when the refs make a lousy call.