Proposal: McDavid to the Rangers...Everybody Available Except Fox/Shesterkin

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

Hivemind

We're Touched
Oct 8, 2010
37,392
13,996
Philadelphia
You don't get to have untouchables in a trade for McDavid.
This.
Only two excluded are two future HOF's. I do understand your point, however.
The irony of the premature designation of these players as future HOFers AND then using that as a justification for putting them off the table in a trade for a player who's a much surer bet as a future HOFer is rather ridiculous. You don't get McDavid without Fox going the other way.
 

FoxyClean

Gets The Tough Pucks Out
Sep 19, 2016
2,691
5,114
Brooklyn
This.

The irony of the premature designation of these players as future HOFers AND then using that as a justification for putting them off the table in a trade for a player who's a much surer bet as a future HOFer is rather ridiculous. You don't get McDavid without Fox going the other way.

I understand. No deal, in that case.
 

Number1RedWingsFan52

Registered User
Mar 17, 2013
40,243
6,038
Winter Haven Florida
Assuming McDavid wants out after this season, what package would the Oilers accept from NYR?

Lafreniere/Kakko/etc. available, only untouchables are Fox and Shesterkin.
:laugh: :laugh: Dude if you want Connor McDavid, Then there's no such things as untouchable. You want McDavid then all players are on the board including Fox and Shesterkin.
 

FoxyClean

Gets The Tough Pucks Out
Sep 19, 2016
2,691
5,114
Brooklyn
:laugh: :laugh: Dude if you want Connor McDavid, Then there's no such things as untouchable. You want McDavid then all players are on the board including Fox and Shesterkin.

Would there be a team that could offer better than Lafreniere/Kakko/Chytil/Lundkvist/Miller/Schneider/1st+ for McDavid?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad