Plural
Registered User
- Mar 10, 2011
- 33,844
- 5,034
Proposal: Matthews (TML) for Barkov (FLA) + 2026 1st
- Thread starter Plural
- Start date
- Status
Dr Jan Itor
Registered User
I am not exposed
Registered User
Barkov is signed for another 6 years.
Matthews is making more and signed for another 4 years.
Florida throwing in a 1st!??! No thanks. I consider these players on a similar tier, so the trade doesn't make much sense for Florida.
Matthews is making more and signed for another 4 years.
Florida throwing in a 1st!??! No thanks. I consider these players on a similar tier, so the trade doesn't make much sense for Florida.
my first thought was - does florida has a 2026 first?
Plural
Registered User
- Mar 10, 2011
- 33,844
- 5,034
Yeah
Seems like a no from both sides. Nevertheless, could be a good move from Leafs end.
The Don Hughes
Registered User
Why in the world would Florida consider this...
Florida just won Stanley Cup with Barkov, he's signed longer for less money, and Panthers don't have too many picks left. Why would they do this?
colchar
Registered User
- Apr 26, 2012
- 7,922
- 1,754
You consider someone who has never scored 40 goals and only surpassed 90 points once to be in the same tier as a guy who has twice scored 60 or more goals and twice exceeded 100 points? Seriously???
Sting
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2004
- 8,099
- 3,325
Barkov > Matthews...why is Florida adding the 1st?
It's not always about pure point totals.
It's not always about pure point totals.
I am not exposed
Registered User
Rorschach
Who the f*** is Trevor Moore?
MOAR POINTZ!!!!1
Ledge And Dairy
Registered User
I give Matthews the edge but they are way closer than you seem to think. Despite only hitting 90 points once (6 years ago) Barkov has paced 90+ points in 4 of the last 5 seasons and 100+ in one of them. That's what happens when you miss 10-15 games a season. Also the fact that Barkov is the hands down best 2-way player in the league closes the gap quite a lot too
- Apr 27, 2005
- 35,404
- 34,190
Yes.
If I want to win a scoring title, I'll take Matthews. If I want to win a cup, I'll take Barkov.
BB88
Registered User
- Jan 19, 2015
- 41,500
- 21,887
Yes the Cup champs would trade their MVP….
Panthers have a great salary structure in place and a leader they all look up to. No chance FLA would move Barkov for Matthews, even if on paper Matthews is the more productive player.
idk, we lose a lot of offense if we lose barkov
but matthews was almost a selke so this is a no brainer trade, i think we have to trade forsling too for it to work
but matthews was almost a selke so this is a no brainer trade, i think we have to trade forsling too for it to work
Plural
Registered User
- Mar 10, 2011
- 33,844
- 5,034
Mogo
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2002
- 25,935
- 12,043
Trading the better player away and adding a 1rst.. makes sense
Florida isn't trading their Stanley Cup winning. 2-way playing. Leadership leading. Heart and Soul Captain. For a 60 goal scorer who doesn't bring anything else to the table. Not happening.
Dr Jan Itor
Registered User
- Oct 7, 2006
- 6,067
- 8,185
That's like asking if you'd rather with the Rocket or the Cup lol
mr figgles
Registered User
- Mar 24, 2012
- 1,446
- 3,309
- Status
