Value of: Mason McTavish? For reals?

Perratrooper

Registered User
May 26, 2016
5,722
4,379
Alberta
While the thought of Trouba/Gudas/Manson down the right feels kind of nice (in the sense that completing a set of worn-out memorabilia items might feel nice), that’s probably a very different discussion if you want to dump to facilitate another trade.
I’m not saying that Manson has crazy high value by any means, but I definitely wouldn’t consider him a cap dump. He’s had a rougher start to season prior to the injury, but I’m sure a lot of teams would be very interested in him.

Obviously given the makeup of the Ducks he likely isn’t a great fit, but would be wild to have that right side defense haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vipers31

WhatTheDuck

9 - 20 - 8
May 17, 2007
24,444
18,291
Worst Case, Ontario
He was at a 55 point pace last year in his age 21 season, on a team that produced one player with exactly 60 points. This isn't a sell low for nickles situation just because his first quarter of a season (wrapped around an injury) was disappointing on a team that could not score to start the year.

However, if the Ducks were looking to package one of their young forwards in a deal that brings back more of a sure thing, McTavish makes the most sense in my opinion.

Selling him for lower upside pieces and throw ins, makes absolutely zero sense for a team already short on higher end talent.

I did float out the idea of McTavish (RFA) for Cozens (5 years remaining at 7.1M). I think a player would need 5 years minimum of cost control for the Ducks to make sense out of moving key assets. Cozens is two years older and a bit more established but young enough to fit the direction, might be a better fit along side Carlsson, Zegras, Gauthier etc. Both are early picks, down years, not someone either side would be selling without getting something they see as likewise foundational in return.
 

Knight

Registered User
Oct 7, 2010
306
623
I would think it would be McTavish+ (whether picks or one of their many young dmen) for someone more established who can pop in some goals. Can't see them moving him for picks/parts.

Is it real? Who the hell knows, the Ducks aren't exactly known for being leaky. But Zegras was looking really good at C before he got hurt and word was the team has been truly happy with his progress, while McTavish has been spotty all year, so perhaps they've finally decided Carlsson-Zegras is their 1-2 of the future down the middle?
Any interest in McAvoy? What would you add to McTavish?
 

hotcabbagesoup

"I'm going to get what I deserve" -RutgerMcgroarty
Feb 18, 2009
11,010
15,337
Reno, Nevada
I appreciate Mario Ferraro’s inclusion in the elite players with term 🤯

I do think at some point, someone will offer stupid vale for him because he plays hard and he’s youngish, but the term elite is bizarre.

Nobody in the league blocks shots like Mario does. Isn't that the meaning of elite? :naughty::naughty: I'm willing to start the bidding at a 3rd rd pick
 
  • Haha
Reactions: matt trick

WhatTheDuck

9 - 20 - 8
May 17, 2007
24,444
18,291
Worst Case, Ontario
Simon Nemec maybe? Any reason McT isn't scoring this year?

The Ducks already have an (over) abundance of young, talented but unestablished defensemen. They have been rotating Mintyukov, Lacombe and Zellweger out of the lineup since acquiring Trouba. McTavish could be part of a package for a proven high end D but swapping him for a young Dman wouldn't make sense.

Part of a package for star talent, or maybe in a core shakeup trade for another young forward of similar ilk. Otherwise no reason to move him.
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
43,283
40,402
Simon Nemec maybe? Any reason McT isn't scoring this year?
Nobody on Anaheim is scoring this year....

Cronin aint a NHL head coach... his system is dog shit.

Any interest in McAvoy? What would you add to McTavish?
If we move Mctavish i think we need a forwards coming back....

I think it would be some sort of package deal

McTavish + (+) for a more established bigger fish.
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
29,526
11,470
He was at a 55 point pace last year in his age 21 season, on a team that produced one player with exactly 60 points. This isn't a sell low for nickles situation just because his first quarter of a season (wrapped around an injury) was disappointing on a team that could not score to start the year.

However, if the Ducks were looking to package one of their young forwards in a deal that brings back more of a sure thing, McTavish makes the most sense in my opinion.

Selling him for lower upside pieces and throw ins, makes absolutely zero sense for a team already short on higher end talent.

I did float out the idea of McTavish (RFA) for Cozens (5 years remaining at 7.1M). I think a player would need 5 years minimum of cost control for the Ducks to make sense out of moving key assets. Cozens is two years older and a bit more established but young enough to fit the direction, might be a better fit along side Carlsson, Zegras, Gauthier etc. Both are early picks, down years, not someone either side would be selling without getting something they see as likewise foundational in return.
Ana needs to do something to really turn the corner, but don't need to rush a move. Doesn't seem like any F is taking a big step forward this season. This would be year 7 out of PO. And they've had 10 firsts and 9 seconds or something over the prior 6 drafts since missing the PO in 2019. On pace for a 70 point season so about 10 points better than last season but would still be over 22 or so behind the pace of WC2 in the West, so still a bunch of ground to make up next season.
 

WhatTheDuck

9 - 20 - 8
May 17, 2007
24,444
18,291
Worst Case, Ontario
Ana needs to do something to really turn the corner, but don't need to rush a move. Doesn't seem like any F is taking a big step forward this season. This would be year 7 out of PO. And they've had 10 firsts and 9 seconds or something over the prior 6 drafts since missing the PO in 2019. On pace for a 70 point season so about 10 points better than last season but would still be over 22 or so behind the pace of WC2 in the West, so still a bunch of ground to make up next season.

They really didn't commit to a full rebuild until Verbeek's first deadline (2022) when he sold off Lindholm, Manson and Rakell in short order. In those final years under Bob Murray, they were out of the playoffs but still focused on winning more than the future. So while it's been many years out of contention, we are in season three post tear down.

That said we are at the point of a rebuild where you want to see progress starting, and we are still way too dogshit overall. They haven't added enough quality vets to support the kids and I don't think Cronin is much of an improvement on Eakins - this group needs an established quality NHL head coach to get them organized. I do hesitate to start moving core pieces without ever seeing them under a good coach
 
  • Like
Reactions: Firequacker

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
43,283
40,402
Ana needs to do something to really turn the corner, but don't need to rush a move. Doesn't seem like any F is taking a big step forward this season. This would be year 7 out of PO. And they've had 10 firsts and 9 seconds or something over the prior 6 drafts since missing the PO in 2019. On pace for a 70 point season so about 10 points better than last season but would still be over 22 or so behind the pace of WC2 in the West, so still a bunch of ground to make up next season.
What we’re doing now isn’t really working…..

We’re not exactly a free agent destination…. Our best bet is a significant trade.
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
43,283
40,402
They really didn't commit to a full rebuild until Verbeek's first deadline (2022) when he sold off Lindholm, Manson and Rakell in short order. In those final years under Bob Murray, they were out of the playoffs but still focused on winning more than the future. So while it's been many years out of contention, we are in season three post tear down.

That said we are at the point of a rebuild where you want to see progress starting, and we are still way too dogshit overall. They haven't added enough quality vets to support the kids and I don't think Cronin is much of an improvement on Eakins - this group needs an established quality NHL head coach to get them organized. I do hesitate to start moving core pieces without ever seeing them under a good coach
A lot of our vets I feel are hurting the kids… what we need is a guy between the older players and younger plays.

Necas woulda been good
Brady would be good
These types

But to get those we’ll have to move on from 1 of carlsson zegras mctavish sennecke or cutter.

For me mctavish is the easiest to move on from
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
29,016
4,389
Da Big Apple
So I'm taking a break and reading ESPN on the NHL (yes, yes, I know), specifically this article:
And in their list of "elite pending free agents" they're sugesting as up for trade, they include... Mason McTavish?

I dunno if I'm looking at wild-ass speculation or if there's actually legitimately something there. In any case, what would the Ducks be looking for? (I imagine it'd be a heck of a lot since it seems more than a little early to give up on him, but if there's Something Else going on...)
OP is credible, responsible poster
props on citing source

that said, at this pt don't see Ducks actively shopping McT
courtesy listen to any/all offers? sure
but serious?
doubt it -- would have to be overpay enuf = exception to the rule
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
43,283
40,402
OP is credible, responsible poster
props on citing source

that said, at this pt don't see Ducks actively shopping McT
courtesy listen to any/all offers? sure
but serious?
doubt it -- would have to be overpay enuf = exception to the rule
Kinda like the zegras stuff the last year +.

Anaheim has to look for ways to improve roster…. If we can upgrade mctavish…. Sure I’d do it. I think zegras is better than mctavish and will be better….. build around zegras cutter carlsson and sennecke up front.
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
29,526
11,470
What we’re doing now isn’t really working…..

We’re not exactly a free agent destination…. Our best bet is a significant trade.
Ana isn’t at the point where FA will want to go there yet. On pace for 70 points so still over 20 away from the PO. Ufas at 29 like a Guentzal for example would not want to spend another 2-3 years out of the PO and make it in years 3-5 and potentially end up getting moved in years 6-7 to open up cap space as their productivity drops.
Might as well join a PO caliber team right away
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
43,283
40,402
Ana isn’t at the point where FA will want to go there yet. On pace for 70 points so still over 20 away from the PO. Ufas at 29 like a Guentzal for example would not want to spend another 2-3 years out of the PO and make it in years 3-5 and potentially end up getting moved in years 6-7 to open up cap space as their productivity drops.
Might as well join a PO caliber team right away
Ya so either we continue to grind out with what we have and take those tier 2 over paid vets like gudas, strome, killorn.

Or we make a big trade to try to boost the team.

I also think changing coach is prob good for another 20 points on its own lol
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
29,526
11,470
They really didn't commit to a full rebuild until Verbeek's first deadline (2022) when he sold off Lindholm, Manson and Rakell in short order. In those final years under Bob Murray, they were out of the playoffs but still focused on winning more than the future. So while it's been many years out of contention, we are in season three post tear down.

That said we are at the point of a rebuild where you want to see progress starting, and we are still way too dogshit overall. They haven't added enough quality vets to support the kids and I don't think Cronin is much of an improvement on Eakins - this group needs an established quality NHL head coach to get them organized. I do hesitate to start moving core pieces without ever seeing them under a good coach
Murray wasn’t exactly signing free agents and the sort from 2019 til he stepped away the way Doug Wilson was doing in SJ. Bought out Perry because he wasn’t a good fit for kids to kickstart the rebuild like Getzlaf.
 

Mackiaveli

Registered User
Nov 24, 2015
1,847
1,526
The most obvious guess would be a two-way force of a RHD, but we all know how rare those are.

Habs and Ducks remain interesting partners to me as the Ducks have young players that fit the Habs timeline and the Habs have interesting prospects that fit the Verbeek style they are trying to build towards.
 

FiveTacos

Registered User
Oct 2, 2017
1,139
1,935
The Twilight Zone
Murray wasn’t exactly signing free agents and the sort from 2019 til he stepped away the way Doug Wilson was doing in SJ. Bought out Perry because he wasn’t a good fit for kids to kickstart the rebuild
like Getzlaf.

Yeah but he didn't really commit to a full on rebuild either. Otherwise the name veterans would have been moved 1-3 years sooner. He sort of rode the fence, which I think is the worst place to be. Either go all in and push like crazy with the vets you have, or start at least a partial teardown and get younger.
 

Rec T

Registered User
Jun 1, 2007
1,592
1,306
NKY
Is he available? Sure, most anyone on the team not named Carlsson or Dostal is I'd imagine ... but it will cost you. As was mentioned a few times, 'if' he's moved it would probably be in a package of him plus one of the young excess Dmen (or perhaps Fowler if the right team is enquiring). And that would pretty much only be for a relatively young but more established star level forward. So it's going to hurt & not just be some random picks & lower level prospects.

But before all of that, I'd 'really' like to see how everyone does under a more coherent coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Firequacker and MCB

thedjpd

Registered User
Sponsor
Dec 12, 2002
3,729
1,032
San Jose, CA
McTavish + lower tiered C prospect for Tippett + Risto?

Big RH forward, big RH D (who has played very well this year - even spot duty on top pair). Both signed. Anaheim has cap space but I'm sure Flyers can retain (on Risto) or take back a dump if it's helpful.

I'd offer a deal around Bonk but the previous post said they'd prefer a vet in that role? Hence Risto. Anyway, not sure. I suck at these.

I just think Flyers and Ducks are really good partners. Flyers have a lot of right shooting wingers, and a few right handed D men who are playing well of the defensive variety (Bonk, Risto, Grans) and need Cs. Ducks opposite - they have lot of Cs and need other positions. There's a deal to be had, for sure.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
29,016
4,389
Da Big Apple
Kinda like the zegras stuff the last year +.

Anaheim has to look for ways to improve roster…. If we can upgrade mctavish…. Sure I’d do it. I think zegras is better than mctavish and will be better….. build around zegras cutter carlsson and sennecke up front.
McT + Zegras + ANA 2026 + 2027 2nds + Helleson
for
LaF + KAM + Lindgren

something like that?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: zegras

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad