your not beinf very clear here...
Ok, let's be clear.
During the playoffs, after Marner had a great game, the team won, and the team was leading the series, you came into the Marner thread, and made objectively false statements about him and the game you admitted to not watching.
Last night, after Marner had a great game that you again admitted you didn't watch, and the team decimated the reigning President trophy winner to top off a 15-2 run, you
immediately came into this Marner thread, and tried to stir up drama by pitting two of our amazing players against each other.
Both times, I didn't say that I was correct
because I watched the games and you didn't, but merely questioned how you could have these adamant opinions about something you haven't seen, especially when you so adamantly refuse to accept any metric, statistic, or measure of his play other than raw points. Both times, I correctly identified that Marner was playing well by every other measure, and that even his lesser production during specific stretches (that pretty much everybody goes through at times) was largely offset by his dominance defensively and in the lesser appreciated aspects of play during those stretches.
Both times, you have completely ignored everything other than raw points, and both times, you didn't even get his raw points correct. Both times, you have been wrong about pretty much everything. Despite suggesting that you want a legitimate discussion, you have avoided the prompt for legitimate discussion in my earlier post, and instead have chosen to misrepresent past discussions and insult people who didn't appreciate your intentionally provocative opening post.
)
