Marc Bergevin

Bergevin Era?


  • Total voters
    168
Status
Not open for further replies.

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
23,420
16,815
Your poll options kind of suck. At least do a grading curve, or less subjective choices.

I hesitated between "I've seen worst" (we all have - Houle. 100% worst, please no one try to deny this, he had no idea what he was doing) and "Not that bad".

I don't think Bergevin did a bad job across all areas - in some ways he did very good, but in some he didn't. In the end, I did not vote for "not that bad" because as a whole, I think it was bad. His last ~3 years was better, but it's still his responsibility some of the huge mistakes the team had (kept Therrien on way too long, caused the whole PK departure thing, dresser room blew up, couldn't develop players for shit, let alone draft).

So I vote "i've seen worst". Houle was worst. Gauthier was a disaster too - didn't he trade a player mid-game, along with a bunch of other weird moves? Also - even though I like Gainey in general - I don't know that I ever hated an off-season more than the year he got rid of Koivu and Kovalev to bring in Gomez + Brian Gionta. That was such an obvious disaster in the making to me at the time, and it didn't age well.

Glad Bergevin is gone. It's way past due for a new era. And I feel quite good about Gorton overall, so excited to see where things go
 
  • Like
Reactions: ourobouros

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
23,420
16,815
You have 6 options... I thought it would be enough...

If you are in between those options you can just write a wall of text saying you don't agree.

You should work for RDS's website. They appreciate good pollsters like you
 

Andy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2008
32,228
17,015
Montreal
He started with a top 3 pick and the team he built after 10 years will probably end up with a top 3 pick.

he’s not as bad as the extreme voices on this board, but he wasn’t great. His trade wins seldom made the team better on the whole.

the team progressively got worse as he changed up the core he inherited. The COVID seasons masked how badly the team was built.

The prospect pool is better than the one he inherited, but it’s the least you can expect from a team that has been in the bottom half of the league for the majority of the last 7 seasons.

when MB got the team, he had Subban, Price, Pacioretty, Markov, Plekanec, Gallagher to work around. Do we have a group of players that good at the moment? Not really. Suzuki, Caufield have promise, but neither are at the level of the aforementioned group (minus Gallagher). All prospects potentially that good are just hopeful at the moment.

there were some good moments over the last 10 years, but they are overshadowed by a lot of frustrating ones.

he oscillated between being an okay GM and a mediocre one over the last 10 years.
 

Lshap

Hardline Moderate
Jun 6, 2011
28,179
27,372
Montreal
He started with a top 3 pick and the team he built after 10 years will probably end up with a top 3 pick.

he’s not as bad as the extreme voices on this board, but he wasn’t great. His trade wins seldom made the team better on the whole.

the team progressively got worse as he changed up the core he inherited. The COVID seasons masked how badly the team was built.

The prospect pool is better than the one he inherited, but it’s the least you can expect from a team that has been in the bottom half of the league for the majority of the last 7 seasons.

when MB got the team, he had Subban, Price, Pacioretty, Markov, Plekanec, Gallagher to work around. Do we have a group of players that good at the moment? Not really. Suzuki, Caufield have promise, but neither are at the level of the aforementioned group (minus Gallagher). All prospects potentially that good are just hopeful at the moment.

there were some good moments over the last 10 years, but they are overshadowed by a lot of frustrating ones.

he oscillated between being an okay GM and a mediocre one over the last 10 years.
Fair and accurate.

I'll add that we'll only know Bergevin's complete legacy in three/four years when his prospects have developed, for better or worse. We can't say say what kind of team Gorton has inherited yet.
 

Andy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2008
32,228
17,015
Montreal
Fair and accurate.

I'll add that we'll only know Bergevin's complete legacy in three/four years when his prospects have developed, for better or worse. We can't say say what kind of team Gorton has inherited yet.
That is a fair point
 

salbutera

Registered User
Sep 10, 2019
15,188
16,976
MBs tenure wasn’t that bad on the whole - he achieved significantly more playoff success than almost all of his so called great peers who were hired in the same period - Nill, Sakic, Chevaldayoff, Shanahan etc.

However, his successes were completely negated by horrendous amateur drafting & lack of flexibility to be innovative / try new things - not recognizing it was time to move on from Timmins was a major management blunder, showing lack of vision regardless even if it was driven by loyalty to a fault
 
Last edited:

Seb

All we are is Dustin Byfuglien
Jul 15, 2006
17,784
14,042
I would've voted "brutal" if it was a choice.

Brutal is how I'd describe how it was to watch Habs games while he was the GM.

I settled for WTF because he had some genius moves and some of the worst ones as well.

WTF is also pretty accurate for how last season followed by the playoffs followed by the offseason went.
 
Last edited:

Tripledeke333

Registered User
Jun 25, 2021
926
900
There are worse GMs in the league, but he was not good at all. His firing is long long overdue.
 

vokiel

#DanzeMolsonMix
Jan 31, 2007
18,666
4,239
Montréal
If there had been an option before Disaster, I think a lot would have picked it. How about 1. Good riddance ?

Hopefully we don't get a new management team who glorifies their biceps and ineptitude at planning with acumen.
 

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
95,548
106,931
Halifax
An unmitigated disaster that gets graduation goggles because of the Cinderella run last year.

Wasted more than half his tenure on terrible developmental coaches like Therrien and Lefebvre.

Instilled a culture of nepotism and cronyism.

Blew the handling of 2 top 3 picks.

Wasted the primes of top end talents and failed to ever pick a direction.

10 years and he didn't leave it any better than he found it and set records of incompetence that will stand the test of time.

His parting gift was selecting a sex offender, letting a top 3 pick go to use that first for a 3rd line center.
 

jackeymoon

Tropical!
Jan 16, 2018
1,032
1,315
Northern Ontario
Made two great trades, some ok trades, a few really really bad ones (Shaw, Eller and Sergachev are horrible)

Terrible drafting and development. Mistreated many guys for not being a foxhole soldier (particularly Radu and Markov, the latter being unforgivable)

Terrible contract extensions and signings overall.

Bad coaching decisions, hires and zero accountability on the management side

I'd give him a 4/10 in general for missing 2 top 3 picks, trading a very good D man for a mediocre winger, hiring garbage development coaches (Sly), hiring based on friendship and not meritocracy and finally for leaving the team in a worse state than when he found it.
 

sandviper

No Ragrets
Jan 26, 2016
13,652
24,999
Toronto
Bergy I think when evaluating goes better when you break it up in 2-year chunks.

2012-2014 - Not that bad
2014-2016 - I’ve seen worse
2016-2018 - WTF
2018 - to up to July 2021 - Good job
After July 2021 - Utter, complete disaster

He’s had some good jobs and WTF during each period, but above is my general feeling.

In the end, I think Bergy is going to be remembered more for the bad than the good, and honestly, if he just ended after our Cinderella run, I’d probably say overall, not that bad. However, based on how he left the team, any good he’s done was undone the moment they drafted who they did. It was ALL downhill since.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs Halifax

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,805
27,858
East Coast
Fair and accurate.

I'll add that we'll only know Bergevin's complete legacy in three/four years when his prospects have developed, for better or worse. We can't say say what kind of team Gorton has inherited yet.

Agreed. It's probably going to be meh in the end but the time to evaluate his job as a whole will have to wait until we see how his reset of higher draft power has worked. I value the high draft power but to me it helps with depth holes, not top of the line-up assets.
 

BenG

Registered User
Sep 15, 2015
570
317
Montreal
Some indictments;

- Draft/Development record
(Lehkonen is only player on team with +80 games that was drafted/developed in-house)

- Failure to acquire top 6 center
(More than 40 Top6 Cs were acquired via trade, FA or drafting during his tenure. None by the Habs)

- Failure to acquire PMDs
(Our current defence is much worse than when we started and we have basic issues leaving our zone let alone entering the o-zone as a team)

- Negotiating top player contracts (Price, Subban, Gallagher, Markov, Radulov, Kotkaniemi, Danault, etc.)

- Negotiating lower-end contracts
(Armia, Byron, etc.)

- Bad FA signings
(Alzner, Savard, etc. )

- PR nightmares
(Issues trying to defend Mailloux pick, interest in Voynov/DeAngelo/etc., Subban trade, disrespecting players like Markov, negotiating via the media, etc.)

His development record has undoubtedly done the most damage with many players even publicly criticizing it in the media. (Pacioretty, Mete, Sergachev, Kotkaniemi, Hudon, Fucale, Eller, etc.)
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,805
27,858
East Coast
Bergy I think when evaluating goes better when you break it up in 2-year chunks.

2012-2014 - Not that bad
2014-2016 - I’ve seen worse
2016-2018 - WTF
2018 - to up to July 2021 - Good job
After July 2021 - Utter, complete disaster

He’s had some good jobs and WTF during each period, but above is my general feeling.

Ironically, the two worse off seasons were the expansion draft years. 2017 and 2021. Whenever he had a big to do list, he struggled

2017:
* Price Contract
* Markov/Radulov gone
* Drouin/Sergachev trade
* Alzner signing

2021:
* Price exposed and not taken
* Weber/Danault gone
* KK Offer Sheet
* Savard signing
* The 1st rounder distraction
* Suzuki contract too high? We will see about that.
 

Andy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2008
32,228
17,015
Montreal
I would've voted "brutal" if it was a choice.

Brutal is how I'd describe how it was to watch Habs games while he was the GM.

I settled for WTF because he had some genius moves and some of the worst ones as well.

WTF is also pretty accurate for how last season followed by the playoffs followed by the offseason went.
The 2014-2015 trade deadline will always be ultimate WTF moment. You have Subban, Petry, Markov, Price. You’re not gonna get better than that on the back end and in goal. You can’t score, so you pick up Brian Flynn and Torrey Mitchell at the deadline.

that was the year to go all in. That roster was just missing some scoring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spring in Fialta

Archijerej

Registered User
Jan 17, 2005
8,565
8,214
Poland
I hesitated between "not that bad" and "I've seen worse". I've been generous with my vote, choosing the former option, because I don't want to be influenced by the fact that I'm currently pissed at Bergevin.

He did good in some areas, but he was clearly bad in others.

EDIT: Actually, I would like to change my vote to "I've seen worse". He started with Price, Markov, Subban, Plekanec, Pacioretty and Gallagher, as well as a 3OA pick.

Additionally, he's had another 3OA pick and a 9OA pick.

He doesn't deserve a vote in the top half of options, at least until one of the prospects he accumulated turns into something special.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad