I think most teams have bottom players that play games who wouldn’t crack a different team’s roster because most teams have those guys already.
Overall drafting as many players that play over 200 games for us or another team is a good indicator of overall drafting success in the NHL, but there have been misses for sure. Sometimes it’s just less obvious how much the rest of the field misses as well.
I think Mann has several picks that have come around recently, like Pinto, Grieg, Sanderson, Tkachuk, Stutzle, and then several more that look pretty good like Kleven, JBD, Tompson, Sokolov, Soogard, Crookshank and then some out of the blue guys like Lodin and Mereleinin (sp).
The entire last draft has a ways to go before we can pass judgement, but Ostapchuk is already looking solid, and given that virtually everyone was a project we’ll have to see.
Not everyone has to be a star, but when you keep churning out players that end up NHL players, it’s a good system at worst.
I don't think that Mann has done anything special at the draft that's made him worthy of his reputation. He's been in charge of the draft since 2017. You can look at the draft history for the Sens' since that time here:
He's done a fine job of drafting players in the top 5. Outside of top-5 picks, and the Batherson/Formenton selections in 2017, his draft record is mediocre. It's still a bit early for most of the years, but Bowers in 2017 looks like a bust. For other years:
2018: None of the non-Tkachuk picks look great. JBD looks like he'll be a player, but likely isn't as good as Miller, Sandin, or Lundkvist. Miller and Sandin were both consensus selections there, while JBD was slightly off the board.
2019: Pinto looks like a solid pick, though it's arguable whether he's trending better than Kaliyev or Brink. Thomson, like JBD, will likely be a player, but doesn't look like any sort of steal, especially with Heinola taken right after him. Heinola was the consensus next-best D.
2020: Greig was a fine pick, but he isn't clearly better than either Brisson or Bourque, who were taken right after him. Jarventie looks like a weak pick compared to JJ Peterka, who most Sens fans wanted the team to draft after getting Stutzle. Many of the players drafted around Jarventie look to be trending better than Jarventie, though there's certainly time for Jarventie to turn that around. Kleven looks like a fine pick for the mid-second round, but doesn't necessarily look to be a steal, especially with Faber taken right after him. Sokolov looks like a good pick for the late 2nd.
2021: It's still far too early, but Boucher so far looks to be a misstep, and has been outperformed by almost every player taken in the next 10 picks. Ostapchuk looks OK, but he only scored at a .6ppg pace in the WHL in his post-draft year, and shouldn't be expected to be anything more than a warm body in the NHL.
Arguably, the Sens' best strength in recent years has been player development rather than drafting. I'm not sure how much of that is on Mann, but if it was him, credit where it's due. The players that have made the NHL in that timeframe were mostly drafted when Dorion was in charge. I'm not sure to what extent Mann has been involved in amateur scouting in relation to trades, but the Sens have hit some home runs there, in particular the Norris trade.
With respect to drafting, I don't think he's done anything that puts him even in the top-third of the league, especially after going so off the board with every pick in 2021, with no clear results to show for it.
e: To be clear, I mostly agree with what you said. The Sens have a good farm system that seems to churn out, at worst, a fair number of replacement-level NHLers. So far, most of those replacement-level NHLers have come from drafts when Dorion was in charge.
I think the main weakness in Manns system is that they seem to be prioritizing potential floor over ceiling, or mis-identifying potential high-ceiling players. As a result, their draft results since 2018 have been fairly weak as they've consistently gone against consensus or passed on higher-ceiling players, without their gambles showing much in the way of tangible results.