Management Thread | Regular Season Edition

[F A N]

So it's awesome to hear from Laurence Gilman again on S&P (why didn't Aquaman just go simple in 2014 and promote him to GM?), but I learned something about the practicalities of cap management from him in today's hit --

When the Canucks send down Bains and Brännström between games, it is not a paper transaction, and they are obliged to report to Abbotsford in person. Now Gilman didn't know how rigorously the NHL would actually be checking for their car moving down Highway 1, but (i) it does matter if they are caught practicing with the NHL team while officially off the roster, and (ii) when the 2011-era Canucks were sending players down to the Moose to maximize cap space, they did literally send them on planes to Winnipeg and the NHL apparently did require proof.

I find this kind of bewildering (and also kind of an environmental disaster). And while I never felt the urgency to get the farm team out of Utica before, knowing this now, that's a huge difference-maker. That's two flights plus an hour's ride from Syracuse, and not something that can be done casually or repeatedly.

I'm surprised by this. I seem to have heard reports in previous years where the player (who has been re-assigned/papered down) will be staying in town.

I was under the impression that the team can give a player some time before they have to report to to the AHL team and if they are immediately recalled they wouldn't need to make the trip?

 

[SillyRabbit]

I've been quite supportive of the management group thus far, but I really don't understand how they looked at least year's defensive core (which was already quite thin) and not only failed to upgrade it but actually made it worse.

We are lacking two top four defenceman. Not one, two.

And while there are some available out there, they will not be cheap.

I really don't understand how they looked at this defensive core and felt confident in it heading into the season.

 

[rypper]

I've been quite supportive of the management group thus far, but I really don't understand how they looked at least year's defensive core (which was already quite thin) and not only failed to upgrade it but actually made it worse.

We are lacking two top four defenceman. Not one, two.

And while there are some available out there, they will not be cheap.

I really don't understand how they looked at this defensive core and felt confident in it heading into the season.

I think the knew it was an unfinished product. They'll trade for a top 4 defender soon (like they always do.) But a move that wasn't there in the off season. Take a chance on a project add some depth going into the season to weather the storm until they go get the player they really like.

 

[SillyRabbit]

I think the knew it was an unfinished product. They'll trade for a top 4 defender soon (like they always do.) But a move that wasn't there in the off season. Take a chance on a project add some depth going into the season to weather the storm until they go get the player they really like.

I mean I feel like there were options as simple as just re-signing Zadorov?

The price for a top 4 defenceman is going to be steep this year.

The way I see it playing out is:

A) We don't get the quality of top 4 defender that we're looking for and our defensive core remains weak
B) We have to pay a high price to get a solid top 4 defender and people are unhappy with how much we paid

I hope I'm wrong though. The Zadorov trade last year was a great trade so management has shown they have the ability to pull stuff like that off.

 

[tantalum]

I've been quite supportive of the management group thus far, but I really don't understand how they looked at least year's defensive core (which was already quite thin) and not only failed to upgrade it but actually made it worse.

We are lacking two top four defenceman. Not one, two.

And while there are some available out there, they will not be cheap.

I really don't understand how they looked at this defensive core and felt confident in it heading into the season.

I think they have two top 4 guys (well top 2 guys) and then a couple guys that can function as a 4/5 but are not able to anchor a second pairing. They are missing that #3 that can stabilize Soucy or Myers, bumping the other down to the third pairing.

 

[Bertuzzzi44]

I've been quite supportive of the management group thus far, but I really don't understand how they looked at least year's defensive core (which was already quite thin) and not only failed to upgrade it but actually made it worse.

The biggest surprise of the playoffs was the great defensive play of the Canucks. The bottom 4 were terrific while Hronek & Hughes struggled and were deliberately targeted.

Playoff D Rankings:
1. Zadorov
2. Myers
3. Soucy

4. Hughes
5. Hronek
6. Cole


It’s wild how drastically different the playoffs are, it’s a totally different game, the Soucy-Myers pairing transformed into an elite shutdown pairing, Cole was great in the 1st series but was spent and terrible in the 2nd series, Big Z looked like Pronger while our 2 best defenceman in the regular season became liabilities at times.

 

[arttk]

I'm surprised by this. I seem to have heard reports in previous years where the player (who has been re-assigned/papered down) will be staying in town.

I was under the impression that the team can give a player some time before they have to report to to the AHL team and if they are immediately recalled they wouldn't need to make the trip?

Might depend on situation, if they are sent down for the purpose of termination or with no intention of bringing them back to the main roster or any roster, they probably don’t need to check.

 

[F A N]

Might depend on situation, if they are sent down for the purpose of termination or with no intention of bringing them back to the main roster or any roster, they probably don’t need to check.

You are missing the point. We're discussing situations that is commonly referred to as "paper" transactions.

 

[Vector]

@F A N & @Jyrki21 I spent a lot of time over the last couple days trying to figure this out. I talked to a Penguins beat writer and on yesterday's Canucks Conversation David Quadrelli and Patrick Johnston added a bit more info. The short of it, when a player is sent down for cap purposes they do not have to report. However, if it is a game day in the AHL then they do have to report. When the Canucks first sent Brannstrom and Bains down, it wasn't a paper transaction and both had to report, according to Thomas Drance. No idea if they kept doing this or subsequent assignments were paper transactions.

 

[theguardianII]

Give the Core a chance, last year this core took the Oilers to game 7 of the 2nd round and may have it made it to the finals if Boeser & Demko weren’t out. This season the pressure is on to perform especially in the playoffs and I’m confident they’ll step up.

But is wasn't just the core, Lindholm, the top points guy, Zadorov, 2nd in defence points, these guys opened up ice for others just those two alone.

The team that took the Oilers to game seven is gone, this is a new group and even early they have issues.
This is a very easy schedule right now and the team has few serious injuries. Demko has been replaced adequately to date and to expect a 3rd liner to save the team? Really?

Already the idea of "Johusa will restore team identity", what an insult to the Captain and assistants.
I guess they exect him to fight in his first game back.

Last year's team maybe could have got to the finals but that is not this group.

 

[Jyrki21]

@F A N & @Jyrki21 I spent a lot of time over the last couple days trying to figure this out. I talked to a Penguins beat writer and on yesterday's Canucks Conversation David Quadrelli and Patrick Johnston added a bit more info. The short of it, when a player is sent down for cap purposes they do not have to report. However, if it is a game day in the AHL then they do have to report. When the Canucks first sent Brannstrom and Bains down, it wasn't a paper transaction and both had to report, according to Thomas Drance. No idea if they kept doing this or subsequent assignments were paper transactions.

So basically the AHL schedule dictates the timing (or at least whether you’ll need to do anything), it sounds like? Gilman did say they were physically sending guys like Schneider to Winnipeg for real, so I guess those stints included game days (or the rules changed).

 

[Vector]

So basically the AHL schedule dictates the timing (or at least whether you’ll need to do anything), it sounds like? Gilman did say they were physically sending guys like Schneider to Winnipeg for real, so I guess those stints included game days (or the rules changed).

From what I gather, at the time he was AGM of the Canucks they still had to report. It's only in the last 4-5 years where they no longer had to report. The timing could be off, however.

 

[Jyrki21]

From what I gather, at the time he was AGM of the Canucks they still had to report. It's only in the last 4-5 years where they no longer had to report. The timing could be off, however.

Oh interesting…! Maybe the league wants to do its part to reduce its carbon footprint.

Also, that would be a massive b*tch with getting to Utica.

 

[Vector]

Oh interesting…! Maybe the league wants to do its part to reduce its carbon footprint.

Also, that would be a massive b*tch with getting to Utica.

They brought up Utica! Jim Benning's team was never in the situation where they were looking to accumulate cap space so it didn't matter.

Sounds like they realized it was a stupid thing to make these players drive to a place or an airport just to turn around again. Was more of a punishment for the player so the league decided to make it easier on everyone.

 

[IComeInPeace]

Our 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th leading scorers on this team were all acquired as UFA’s

Also (excluding Quinn Hughes) the teams MVP at this point has likely been another UFA signing in Lankinen.

That’s 6 UFA’s at an average salary of just over $2.25 million playing significant roles on a very good team…

Sure, there have been some possible misses along the way (signing both Forbort and Desharnais instead of just one of them could work out that way), but what this management group has accomplished in free agency is absolutely amazing.

 

[tantalum]

Our 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th leading scorers on this team were all acquired as UFA’s

Also (excluding Quinn Hughes) the teams MVP at this point has likely been another UFA signing in Lankinen.

That’s 6 UFA’s at an average salary of just over $2.25 million playing significant roles on a very good team…

Sure, there have been some possible misses along the way (signing both Forbort and Desharnais instead of just one of them could work out that way), but what this management group has accomplished in free agency is absolutely amazing.

Ya but can they mentor? That average salary suggests absolutely not!

Seriously, there will always be misses but as long as the hits significantly outweigh them then things are moving in the correct direction.

 

[theguardianII]

No Boeser, No Demko and EP playing worse than Blueger for over 70 games now.
That is over 22 million in cap space. That's allows signing big name FAs in summer. Marner, Rantanen, ?
If Demko is already replaced, so far.
EP is easily replaced playing how he is playing now.
Boeser will be replaced on Miller's line just as Horvat's 30+ goals were.

 

[HairyKneel]

And yet the Canucks are 7-2-3 when not firing on all cylinders...

Not sure how you can consider adding a UFA Marner or Rantanen given the cap situation in the next 2 seasons. You aren't going to flip Demko or EP with zero salary coming back.

He wants to dismantle the team at every turn. I would say he's up and down like a whore's pants but he always seems to be down. He needs a good dose of the Partridge Family. "Com on get happy"

 

[ChuckNorris4Cup]

Going back and reading my last message available to see in my history and this is what I wrote, in the old topic in 2018, The Rebuild Started.....

• Aug 4, 2018

• 
  
• Add bookmark
• #951

The rebuild should of started in 2013 instead of the retool, and they could of started possibly being a more serious team by now, but because they didn't want to rebuild they've just prolonged the whole thing all together, and that's the issue I have and not happy about.

Basically 6 years later, and 11 years later from when I wanted them to actually do a rebuild, we're on a 2nd retool now under this new management, and what 5 coaches later, and the issues seem to be right back to where they started again. Just do a proper rebuild already and get it over with. This mediocre bubble team crap has gone on long enough.

 

[VanJack]

Bottom line, the Canucks are without a 40-goal scorer in Boeser; a 100-point center in Miller; and a goaltender who was runner-up in the Vezina voting a year ago.

A guess there are a few teams in the league that could survive the loss of those type of players---but off the top of my head, I'm having trouble coming up with one.

 

[mriswith]

I'll wait for the official story before grabbing my pitchfork but it's ready and waiting. If the rumours that I won't repeat because they're unsubstantiated around the Miller situation and his injuries are true, there needs to be some firings.

There's been far too much gross mishandling of significant injuries recently. Demko - fine, I'll accept Clark as the sacrifice. Mikheyev, EP and then Miller - 3 strikes, you're out.

 

[MarkusNaslund19]

I'll wait for the official story before grabbing my pitchfork but it's ready and waiting. If the rumours that I won't repeat because they're unsubstantiated around the Miller situation and his injuries are true, there needs to be some firings.

There's been far too much gross mishandling of significant injuries recently. Demko - fine, I'll accept Clark as the sacrifice. Mikheyev, EP and then Miller - 3 strikes, you're out.

I think I saw the same post. Something about a degenerative spine condition or something?

Nothing to substantiate that until or unless there is.

if it was that, I don't think it would be a leave of absence with Friedman saying he's possibly back as soon as Dec 3rd and it's linked to burnout.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

 

[Hodgy]

I think I saw the same post. Something about a degenerative spine condition or something?

Nothing to substantiate that until or unless there is.

if it was that, I don't think it would be a leave of absence with Friedman saying he's possibly back as soon as Dec 3rd and it's linked to burnout.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

Ya, you’d likely just disclose it’s an injury and not disclose the particulars.

 

[mriswith]

I think I saw the same post. Something about a degenerative spine condition or something?

Nothing to substantiate that until or unless there is.

if it was that, I don't think it would be a leave of absence with Friedman saying he's possibly back as soon as Dec 3rd and it's linked to burnout.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

What I saw was quite a bit worse than that. I'm not grabbing my pitchfork yet, maybe he comes back Dec 3 at 100%. But it's close at hand, it's entirely believable to me that they majorly bungled another injury on this team.