seventieslord
Student Of The Game
(copied from my thread in the History Of Hockey section and reposted here for fellow Leafs fans)
The Leafs are about to play a game 7 in a series in which they have unequivocally been the better team inspired me to do some research tonight. This is a summary of all the similar series that have taken place in the history of the best-of-7 series.
The TOR-MTL series this year is the 24th instance of a team scoring at least 57% of the series' goals over the first six games, yet miraculously losing three of those six games. The previous 23 times are detailed in the following chart:
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
Teams that are dominating in goal differential but tied in the series 3-3, usually smarten up and win game 7... but, not always.
They are 15-8 in game seven, with a 74-43 goal differential (.652 win%, .748 expected). Home ice doesn't seem to enhance the advantage - typically, if you're outplaying the opponent, that continues into game 7, home or away.
In almost all cases, the team dominating on the scoresheet is also the one dominating territorially - shots on goal usually heavily advantage the team that's been doing all the scoring, even though they spent a lot of the series ahead. There have been six notable exceptions, and in each case, goaltending has been a major factor, usually famously so. We have:
- 2011 Thomas vs. Luongo in which the latter was rock solid in his wins and a sieve in his losses,
- 2001 Roy vs. Brodeur where Marty put up an .870 while Roy solidified his Smythe win
- 2011 Roloson versus "between Stanley Cups" MAF
- 2003 Roloson versus Dan Cloutier (enough said)
- 1983 Peeters versus Sauve; I don't believe this was a famous series, but Sauve really shat the bed with an .835 series despite Buffalo quite possibly being better
- and finally, 2016 Andersen vs. Rinne is the strange exception here, in which goaltending was a major factor in the series' first 6 games (Andersen .955 to Rinne's .901) but the trend did not continue in game 7, a win for Rinne.
Interestingly, Vancouver has been the "dominated" team four times in recent history - twice in 2003, when they easily won a game 7 in a series they had been blown out in, then lost a game 7 in what was a more expected result. This team went 7-7 despite being 34-47 in GD.
The other time was when they nearly - but didn't - blow the 2011 first round series to Chicago, but then had a similarly lopsided series in the final against Boston and this time lightning didn't strike for them in game 7. These Canucks were 15-10 despite the 58-69 goal differential!
conclusion as it applies to tomorrow: The Leafs should win tomorrow, fairly easily, but that probably means they will lose because they never do what they should do.
The Leafs are about to play a game 7 in a series in which they have unequivocally been the better team inspired me to do some research tonight. This is a summary of all the similar series that have taken place in the history of the best-of-7 series.
The TOR-MTL series this year is the 24th instance of a team scoring at least 57% of the series' goals over the first six games, yet miraculously losing three of those six games. The previous 23 times are detailed in the following chart:
Year | Team1 | Goals | EN | Shots | Team2 | Goals | EN | Shots | Goal% | Shot% | Goal%/Shot% | H/A | G7GF | G7GA | W/L | G7Goal% |
2011 | BOS | 19 | 0 | 204 | VAN | 8 | 0 | 209 | 0.704 | 0.494 | 1.425 | A | 4 | 0 | W | 1.000 |
2009 | WSH | 17 | 0 | 192 | NYR | 10 | 0 | 151 | 0.630 | 0.560 | 1.125 | H | 2 | 1 | W | 0.667 |
2001 | COL | 16 | 0 | 124 | NJD | 10 | 0 | 152 | 0.615 | 0.449 | 1.370 | H | 3 | 1 | W | 0.750 |
1976 | BOS | 23 | 1 | 179 | LAK | 14 | 0 | 161 | 0.611 | 0.526 | 1.161 | H | 3 | 0 | W | 1.000 |
2011 | TBY | 21 | 1 | 157 | PIT | 14 | 1 | 221 | 0.606 | 0.415 | 1.459 | A | 1 | 0 | W | 1.000 |
2011 | CHI | 21 | 0 | 184 | VAN | 14 | 0 | 180 | 0.600 | 0.505 | 1.187 | A | 1 | 2 | L | 0.333 |
2003 | MIN | 22 | 0 | 133 | VAN | 15 | 0 | 171 | 0.595 | 0.438 | 1.359 | A | 4 | 2 | W | 0.667 |
2003 | STL | 20 | 1 | 164 | VAN | 13 | 0 | 151 | 0.594 | 0.521 | 1.140 | A | 1 | 4 | L | 0.200 |
2009 | DET | 16 | 0 | 179 | PIT | 12 | 1 | 169 | 0.593 | 0.514 | 1.152 | H | 1 | 2 | L | 0.333 |
2016 | ANA | 17 | 1 | 163 | NSH | 12 | 1 | 173 | 0.593 | 0.485 | 1.222 | H | 1 | 2 | L | 0.333 |
2021 | TOR | 17 | 1 | 205 | MTL | 11 | 0 | 175 | 0.593 | 0.539 | 1.098 | |||||
1983 | BOS | 30 | 0 | 158 | BUF | 21 | 0 | 175 | 0.588 | 0.474 | 1.240 | H | 3 | 2 | W | 0.600 |
1995 | CGY | 31 | 1 | 199 | SJS | 21 | 0 | 160 | 0.588 | 0.554 | 1.061 | H | 4 | 5 | L | 0.444 |
1988 | BOS | 24 | 0 | 196 | NJD | 17 | 0 | 156 | 0.585 | 0.557 | 1.051 | H | 6 | 2 | W | 0.750 |
1992 | VAN | 24 | 0 | 196 | WPG | 17 | 0 | 165 | 0.585 | 0.543 | 1.078 | H | 5 | 0 | W | 1.000 |
2018 | BOS | 21 | 0 | 209 | TOR | 16 | 1 | 173 | 0.583 | 0.547 | 1.066 | H | 7 | 4 | W | 0.636 |
1981 | PHI | 25 | 0 | 216 | CGY | 18 | 0 | 173 | 0.581 | 0.555 | 1.047 | H | 1 | 4 | L | 0.200 |
1994 | DET | 25 | 0 | 188 | SJS | 18 | 0 | 136 | 0.581 | 0.580 | 1.002 | H | 2 | 3 | L | 0.400 |
2016 | STL | 19 | 1 | 181 | DAL | 13 | 0 | 172 | 0.581 | 0.513 | 1.132 | A | 6 | 1 | W | 0.857 |
2019 | BOS | 21 | 3 | 179 | STL | 14 | 1 | 174 | 0.581 | 0.507 | 1.145 | H | 1 | 4 | L | 0.200 |
1952 | MTL | 15 | 0 | BOS | 11 | 0 | 0.577 | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | H | 3 | 1 | W | 0.750 | ||
1993 | TOR | 16 | 1 | 264 | STL | 11 | 0 | 188 | 0.577 | 0.584 | 0.988 | H | 6 | 0 | W | 1.000 |
1971 | CHI | 17 | 1 | 171 | NYR | 12 | 0 | 204 | 0.571 | 0.456 | 1.253 | H | 4 | 2 | W | 0.667 |
2001 | COL | 12 | 0 | 160 | LAK | 9 | 0 | 149 | 0.571 | 0.518 | 1.104 | H | 5 | 1 | W | 0.833 |
Teams that are dominating in goal differential but tied in the series 3-3, usually smarten up and win game 7... but, not always.
They are 15-8 in game seven, with a 74-43 goal differential (.652 win%, .748 expected). Home ice doesn't seem to enhance the advantage - typically, if you're outplaying the opponent, that continues into game 7, home or away.
In almost all cases, the team dominating on the scoresheet is also the one dominating territorially - shots on goal usually heavily advantage the team that's been doing all the scoring, even though they spent a lot of the series ahead. There have been six notable exceptions, and in each case, goaltending has been a major factor, usually famously so. We have:
- 2011 Thomas vs. Luongo in which the latter was rock solid in his wins and a sieve in his losses,
- 2001 Roy vs. Brodeur where Marty put up an .870 while Roy solidified his Smythe win
- 2011 Roloson versus "between Stanley Cups" MAF
- 2003 Roloson versus Dan Cloutier (enough said)
- 1983 Peeters versus Sauve; I don't believe this was a famous series, but Sauve really shat the bed with an .835 series despite Buffalo quite possibly being better
- and finally, 2016 Andersen vs. Rinne is the strange exception here, in which goaltending was a major factor in the series' first 6 games (Andersen .955 to Rinne's .901) but the trend did not continue in game 7, a win for Rinne.
Interestingly, Vancouver has been the "dominated" team four times in recent history - twice in 2003, when they easily won a game 7 in a series they had been blown out in, then lost a game 7 in what was a more expected result. This team went 7-7 despite being 34-47 in GD.
The other time was when they nearly - but didn't - blow the 2011 first round series to Chicago, but then had a similarly lopsided series in the final against Boston and this time lightning didn't strike for them in game 7. These Canucks were 15-10 despite the 58-69 goal differential!
conclusion as it applies to tomorrow: The Leafs should win tomorrow, fairly easily, but that probably means they will lose because they never do what they should do.