Went to my first game in 1957.Are there even any 70+ year olds on here?
I have seen a lot and remember most of it.Went to my first game in 1957.
Dang didn't expect anyone older than my stepdad (69) in hereWent to my first game in 1957.
When @OldCraig71 wakes up from his nap he'll tell us if he's up there yetAre there even any 70+ year olds on here?
God damn my parents weren't born And I'm 38Went to my first game in 1957.
I’m older than 38. By just a bit.When @OldCraig71 wakes up from his nap he'll tell us if he's up there yet
God damn my parents weren't born And I'm 38
I have seen a lot and remember most of it.
Old-timer game in 1966 and first Habs game 1968.Went to my first game in 1957.
All three were keys to that dynasty.Who was most important to the late-1950s team, Béliveau, Plante or Harvey in your opinion?
All three were keys to that dynasty.
Plante was revolutionary for more than being the masked marvel. He was the first goaltender to regularly handle the puck outside of the crease. His strength was being able to anticipate the play rather than react to it. In an interview shortly before he fied he said that he was able to predict where the shot would be coming from and position himself in advance of shot so it made the save routine. Would the stacked team that played in front of him have had the same success with a different, lesser goalie? Probably. But with Plante, winning was assured.
Harvey was also revolutionary. He was one of the first offence orientated defencemen in the NHL. He didn’t do it with great skating, but with adopting a mindset or offensive posture that most defencemen of his era eschewed. Harvey would support offensive rushes and sometimes skate into the offensive zone either carrying the puck or supporting an aggressive forecheck. He was a true quarterback on the powerplay and displayed great vision and passing ability. Harvey was tough as nails and was rarely challenged by other players. He was a quiet leader who lead by example on the ice. Harvey played a controlled game and logged huge minutes. He was an integral part of that dynasty and the team would have had a hard time winning 5 Cups in a row without him.
Jean Beliveau was my favourite player of all time. I still have the first page of the newspaper announcing this great man’s death pasted on the wall of my office. While This majestic player had great size, stickhandling and skating that made him a superstar in the league during this dynastic run, in my opinion Beliveau’s actually was better in the 1960s that during this 5 Cup era. As opposed to Plante and Harvey were unique and indispensable to the team, in the late 1950s the CAnadiens had many talented offensive players and options.
Bottom line, while the team could have succeded without Plante and Beliveau, they could not have overcome the absence of Harvey.
I've seen two games in Tampa (2005 and 2012), 1 game in Toronto (1978)I saw the Habs several times at Maple Leafs Garden in the 60's and 70's.
Sooner than I'd like.lolAre there even any 70+ year olds on here?
Kovalev handed me his stick after a morning skate in CarolinaI've attended games in the 2000's and got to see Alexei Kovalev live in person if anybody wants to hear my stories?
My father met Jean Beliveau in a grocery store in the early 50's. Dad was buying a case of Labatt's and big Jean walked over and said- I rarely meet a man of the same size and proceeded to buy my dad the case of beer. Eventhough I grew up in the states my dad always told stories about The Rocket, Dickie Moore, Jean Beliveau, John Ferguson, there was always a great story.All three were keys to that dynasty.
Plante was revolutionary for more than being the masked marvel. He was the first goaltender to regularly handle the puck outside of the crease. His strength was being able to anticipate the play rather than react to it. In an interview shortly before he fied he said that he was able to predict where the shot would be coming from and position himself in advance of shot so it made the save routine. Would the stacked team that played in front of him have had the same success with a different, lesser goalie? Probably. But with Plante, winning was assured.
Harvey was also revolutionary. He was one of the first offence orientated defencemen in the NHL. He didn’t do it with great skating, but with adopting a mindset or offensive posture that most defencemen of his era eschewed. Harvey would support offensive rushes and sometimes skate into the offensive zone either carrying the puck or supporting an aggressive forecheck. He was a true quarterback on the powerplay and displayed great vision and passing ability. Harvey was tough as nails and was rarely challenged by other players. He was a quiet leader who lead by example on the ice. Harvey played a controlled game and logged huge minutes. He was an integral part of that dynasty and the team would have had a hard time winning 5 Cups in a row without him.
Jean Beliveau was my favourite player of all time. I still have the first page of the newspaper announcing this great man’s death pasted on the wall of my office. While This majestic player had great size, stickhandling and skating that made him a superstar in the league during this dynastic run, in my opinion Beliveau’s actually was better in the 1960s that during this 5 Cup era. As opposed to Plante and Harvey were unique and indispensable to the team, in the late 1950s the CAnadiens had many talented offensive players and options.
Bottom line, while the team could have succeded without Plante and Beliveau, they could not have overcome the absence of Harvey.