You should be happy there aren’t dislikes on this forum.The glue that held this team together.
You should be happy there aren’t dislikes on this forum.The glue that held this team together.
Yeah I think it was definitely reasonable to expect substantial improvement after two weeks of camp and three games.Defense has really turned the corner with Ruff gone.
Yeah I think it was definitely reasonable to expect substantial improvement after two weeks of camp and three games.
Just watch the kind of D that Carolina plays. Their D are engaged, and their 5-man system is built around the Fs reading when their D are applying pressure (which is constantly), and filling in the holes so that there's no counterattack odd-man rush opportunities. FFS, Joel Edmundson, their Marc Staal, looks more engaged and dangerous than most of our D.(My shadow) yeah, it was Ruff’s fault this roster doesn’t play defense well. lol
He is obviously not the only problem--Marc Staal sucks, Brendan Smith usually sucks, Brady Skjei was bad here all year, Trouba had problems adjusting, etc. There are clearly bigger issues than Ruff. But even if you're here just to make fun of people who think Lindy is more to blame than he really is, trying to disprove that belief by pointing to the results of two playoff games after a five month layoff--when the new guy hasn't even tried to install wholesale changes to the system--would still be pretty absurd.(My shadow) yeah, it was Ruff’s fault this roster doesn’t play defense well. lol
Just watch the kind of D that Carolina plays. Their D are engaged, and their 5-man system is built around the Fs reading when their D are applying pressure (which is constantly), and filling in the holes so that there's no counterattack odd-man rush opportunities. FFS, Joel Edmundson, their Marc Staal, looks more engaged and dangerous than most of our D.
Contrast that with what we do. We still play like our Ds are an entirely different unit from our Fs. Our only D who really engage and get aggressive in the O zone are, surprise surprise, DeAngelo and Fox. Carolina has every single D applying pressure. We also cede the blue line and back in on our goalies, giving up grade A chances in the process.
Now, I don't know how much of the state of our D was really Ruff's "fault," but we have some really good talent back there. Albeit, there's trash mixed in as well, but I've always felt that we played worse than the sum of our parts on D. I personally think that goes to coaching.
In addition, and getting more to the point, I think it's ridiculous to expect 3 years of programming (how long Ruff was our D coach) to be undone in a couple weeks. The only pre-Ruff D on our roster are Staal (obvious) and Smith (TDL acquisition the season before Ruff got hired).
Ultimately, everything is going to fall on Quinn if he can't get things fixed, but I think Ruff was definitely part of the problem. We've been perpetual bottom-feeders in the D department for his entire tenure. A good coach is going to at least get mediocre results out of the units we've fielded. As I said previously, as crummy as our D roster has been, we've still played worse than the sum of our parts.
So your point is that Lindy wasn't the main problem? Sure, that's fine. And your evidence is two games? LOL.
I think they said yesterday during the game that Carolina gave up more breakaways than any team in the league. I could be wrong but I’m pretty sure I heard that in the commentary. Also didn’t NYR D lead the league in points from a defense?Just watch the kind of D that Carolina plays. Their D are engaged, and their 5-man system is built around the Fs reading when their D are applying pressure (which is constantly), and filling in the holes so that there's no counterattack odd-man rush opportunities. FFS, Joel Edmundson, their Marc Staal, looks more engaged and dangerous than most of our D.
Contrast that with what we do. We still play like our Ds are an entirely different unit from our Fs. Our only D who really engage and get aggressive in the O zone are, surprise surprise, DeAngelo and Fox. Carolina has every single D applying pressure. We also cede the blue line and back in on our goalies, giving up grade A chances in the process.
Now, I don't know how much of the state of our D was really Ruff's "fault," but we have some really good talent back there. Albeit, there's trash mixed in as well, but I've always felt that we played worse than the sum of our parts on D. I personally think that goes to coaching.
In addition, and getting more to the point, I think it's ridiculous to expect 3 years of programming (how long Ruff was our D coach) to be undone in a couple weeks. The only pre-Ruff D on our roster are Staal (obvious) and Smith (TDL acquisition the season before Ruff got hired).
Ultimately, everything is going to fall on Quinn if he can't get things fixed, but I think Ruff was definitely part of the problem. We've been perpetual bottom-feeders in the D department for his entire tenure. A good coach is going to at least get mediocre results out of the units we've fielded. As I said previously, as crummy as our D roster has been, we've still played worse than the sum of our parts.
The concept of "team defense" is pretty well-understood and no one is going to give our forwards glowing marks on their defensive play. The defensive deficiencies exist way, way beyond that and will likely require a change in philosophy, a change in system, and some change in personnel. Again though, none of this is new.my point is the post above this one. Been driving that point for more than two games. You’ve shadowed me so often, you should have known.
The concept of "team defense" is pretty well-understood and no one is going to give our forwards glowing marks on their defensive play. The defensive deficiencies exist way, way beyond that and will likely require a change in philosophy, a change in system, and some change in personnel. Again though, none of this is new.
Who is this guy and why is he the worst poster not on my ignore list?thanks for yesterdays news although you don’t have Ruff to use as the scapegoat.
Answering this question would require more intimate knowledge of your ignore list than I have.Who is this guy and why is he the worst poster not on my ignore list?
Who is this guy and why is he the worst poster not on my ignore list?
If I had to guess, there’s not a soul on this board that cares about your respect.you’ll have to shadow me 24/7 to lose my respect like the other shadow.
My ignore list is fun J$. There’s no rhyme or reason to who’s on it and why.Answering this question would require more intimate knowledge of your ignore list than I have.
If I had to guess, there’s not a soul on this board that cares about your respect.
What are parties?you must be a blast at parties
What are parties?
Man, I did. And I am DEVASTATED that some random schlub on the internet doesn't respect me. I mean, no kidding--it really ruined me. I may never recover.If I had to guess, there’s not a soul on this board that cares about your respect.
Man, I did. And I am DEVASTATED that some random schlub on the internet doesn't respect me. I mean, no kidding--it really ruined me. I may never recover.![]()
We were arguing about COVID like a month and a half ago. You haven't had me on ignore for nine months. I know you're getting senile and have a hard time staying awake through your broadcasts, but come on, man! As part of my shadowing, I'll poke you with a stick every so often to make sure you're still with us.Hang in there like Ruff. you can still shadow me like you have over the past year (including the nine months on ignore lol)
We were arguing about COVID like a month and a half ago. You haven't had me on ignore for nine months. I know you're getting senile and have a hard time staying awake through your broadcasts, but come on, man! As part of my shadowing, I'll poke you with a stick every so often to make sure you're still with us.
ANYWAY...moving on.