Confirmed with Link: Lindy Ruff and Kevyn Adams will be answering YOUR questions at Blue & Gold Insights on June 12!

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Royal Thunder

Frolunda Mode
Feb 21, 2012
4,415
3,446
If they do make a trade for a defense top 4 dman. Then what was the point of acquiring Byram?
If my memory is correct didn’t Adams say post-deadline that he had been exploring another trade for a D even after Byram? I feel like they will want to have some insurance with Samuelsson’s injury issues
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fjordy and joshjull

Doug Prishpreed

Registered User
May 1, 2013
10,884
7,383
Brooklyn
If my memory is correct didn’t Adams say post-deadline that he had been exploring another trade for a D even after Byram? I feel like they will want to have some insurance with Samuelsson’s injury issues
Chad from expected buffalo podcast has said this many times, that Adams was trying to get another defenseman at the deadline, after the Byram trade. But who knows, it may have just been a #7 to replace EJ, so he could keep RyJo in rochester. Or a temporary Sammy replacement.
 

Dingo44

We already won the trade
Sponsor
Jul 21, 2015
11,429
13,757
Greensboro, NC
If the plan isn't to use RyJo or a resigned Bryson for #7, then they might wait until the frenzy cools off and pick up one of the defensemen left without a chair. They may resign Joker and sign or trade for a big defensive RD and move Clifton to #7.
 

Dingo44

We already won the trade
Sponsor
Jul 21, 2015
11,429
13,757
Greensboro, NC


not the best but itll do for now


Thank you. Interesting that they are having it in the arena. I guess the roof is done. I wonder if they'll get the new scoreboard installed in time for next season.

Also wonder what is on the seats in the lower bowl. I know they usually use the luxury boxes for the player interviews at the Combine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MeenOlViks

HogtownSabresfan

Registered User
Jan 13, 2010
7,088
1,938
Keith Pelley doesn't do Q&A's in Toronto. Geoff Molson doesn't do them in Montreal. Why would Pegula?
Pelley just did one. But okay.

That Skinner comment absolutely sounded like a guy trying way too hard to find something good to say about the player. He already doesn't like him.

You are bringing your own bias into this. He said nothing close to what you are saying.
 

Dubi Doo

Registered User
Aug 27, 2008
19,930
13,742
So, they had the biggest B&G I yet. Had about 2/3s of the rink set up with chairs and about 3/4's of those were full. A few people were also scattered throughout the lower bowl but there weren't too many of them.

Some topics covered (with my commnets in parenthesis):

What's been the main thing this off-season so far. For Adams it was the exit meetings with the players; finding out what they thought of their individual seasons and letting them know what he thought of them. Missed Ruff's answer.

Kevyn & Lindy talk every day so he's getting an understanding of what players Lindy wants to target. Mentioned part of that is getting the pairings right. (So though personally didn't expect to see any changes to the D perhaps there might be some changes there. Guess we'll see in 3 or so weeks.)

Kevyn - Jerry Forton's done a "phenomenal job" and he will now oversee the pro scouting in addition to just the amateur scouting. He said that Jerry is the one that oversees the draft. (So, love or hate the past couple of drafts, it seems that Forton is the one getting all the input and making the choice.)

Lindy - No settling in period for him getting back to Buffalo. Spoke a few times about how glad he is to be back and how he considers himself to be a Buffaloanian. Says the biggest area of improvement will come from how the Sabres defend. Said a big part of the offense last year tailing off some is teams were gameplanning to take the rush away from the Sabres and they weren't ready/able to get the tip in / net front goals they needed to make up for that. Sounds like getting guys to the front of the net will also be a priority (along with the improved play in their own end). They will find different ways to win hockey games this year; they won't only beat teams via goals off the rush.

Both have been watching the playoffs and spoke of how the D play picks up in the playoffs.

Lindy - wants to get to know the players this off-season. Spoke about how Appert knows many of the young players and gives Lindy input on them. (But there are a lot of guys on the team Appert has never worked with. He's worked with a lot of the young guys but there are more than a few that haven't spent any appreciable time in Ra-cha-cha.)

Kevyn - loves the draft. So much going on this time of year - draft coming up, contract negotiations w/ RFAs, UFAs become available shortly; and all at essentially the same time.

Duff - Development camp will be held July 1 - 4.

Lindy says he's evolved from earlier in his career by focusing more on building relationships with the players. He wants to get to know their families and their games so that trust is built because guys are going to get asked to change their games. He then rementioned how he's just getting to know the guys.

Kevyn says he's learned and lot and continues to do so. He's found there are better ways to do things (presumably than from when he was starting out). And he tries to prioritize "what matters most" each day and that might be something w/ a ST focus or a LT focus depending upon the day. Lou Lamiorello told him to remember that the GM is putting out fires every single day.

Q to Lindy - do you know what's on a GM's plate? Lindy - Kevyn is constantly trying to make the team better; it differs from what a coach does because he evaluates the play after every game but moves on by the next day's practice. They both need to set what the standard is of what is acceptable. Kevyn added - do the right things at the right time. Not sure if this next statement was from Lindy or both of them - there needs to be a higher level of play. (Applause for that answer.)

How to choose a captain. Lindy - it has changed through the years. The captain sets the example for everyone and is the captain for the whole team. He leads by example; he doesn't chirp his teammates; EVERYBODY has to meet his standard. The captain sets the examples by how he practices, does stuff like gets to the rink on time, helps the coaches by asking guys why they did what they did in a particular situation (and helps to critique it).

Kevyn - "we'll have a real good captain." (So, it sure does seem like they already know who they intend to be wearing letters this year.)

How do you keep guys in the moment? (paraphrasing that Q) Lindy - it seems counter intuitive, but let them have fun. There will be tough games but put it behind them and get ready the next day in practice.

Kevyn - we both want to raise the standard. What will you do today to make yourself the best you can be. (The way they've been bringing this theme up, it seems this is a new thing. Personally, like it in theory; let's see how it get implemented.)

How do you drop a guy down a line? (another paraphrased Q) - Lindy - You talk with them. You never really arrive; you always have to get better; there is always somebody trying to take your job.

Missed a bit of the answer to a Q about the vision for the bottom 6. Only caught the part about how in the playoffs the top lines tend to cancel each other out and the bottom 6 become more important (mentioned E-Rod). Missed the rest of the answer.

Question asked about whether there will be additional changes to the coaching staff and to the hockey department with a follow up about who will be coaching the PP because it was disappointing last year. (Question got an ovation. Well, it was either the question or the questioner's flow that got the ovation. Maybe it was both. 😉 (Actually, the ovation for the Q was pretty sweet. It was the only one that was asked by an adult that got that reaction.) Lindy - Seth Appert and Lindy will run it with Seth leading it. There will be significantly more motion. They want to get shooters into different positions. (Draisatl and McDavid in the playoffs as the example of what they're going to strive for.) Motion is a key to keep your best shooters open. The Amerks PP has been good. They want to keep possession on entries and want to keep the same 5 guys together on the PP. (So don't expect a lot of experimentation wtih personnel in season once they get something they expect will work.)

Kevyn - would like to possibly add another pro scout for out west to the staff. The analytics staff is an extension of the 2 scouting staffs (pro and amateur).

Lindy was asked about similarities between Hamilton and Power. Said he sees similarities with Hughes, Bratt, and Hischier on the Sabres. Presumably Dahlin was the 1st comparable (but maybe he was talking about the other Hughes, would Thompson be the comparable(?)). Peterka was the Bratt comparable and Cozens the Hischier comparable. He talked about how it took that Devils team 2 years to come together and this team has been together for 2 years as well.

KA - seems to be rooting for Florida as the Okposo draft pick improves by 2 rounds if they do.

From a Q by a kid about the dream of playing hockey, Adams mentioned how you don't retire, you just get told you're not good enough anymore. And he's always dreamed of winning a Stanley Cup with the Buffalo Sabres. (So, still chasing the dream.) Lindy says chase your dream. And Duffer mentioned there are areas you can work in the game even if you aren't good enough to play at that level.

They answered a few other Q's about Capfriendly going away and the Salary Cap going up; about FA and how Adams approaches it; who Dahlin's partner will be this coming season; and about the goalies heading into last year and heading into this year.

Lindy ended the night telling the crowd at Kevyn's insistance about what he told the security guard at the Bills practice this morning. He 1st told him that he was Adams' Uber driver. (Apparently Adams was in the back seat for some reason.) He then told him that he's the Bills new Tight End. His 40 is slow but the hands are still good.
Thanks for the insight!

Some quick points:

- Ruff wants to score in different ways. Some of that will come with a different coaching philosophy, but Im assuming he'll want players who fit his coaching style, and Adams has shown he values his coach's opinion on players. I think we'll see some moves to bring in those net front players

- I hope the players heard the cheers from the fans when Ruff said they need a 'higher level of play'. The effort level was piss poor this season.

- Ruff is 100% going to attempt to mold Cozens into that two-way beast we all had hope he could become.

- Dahlin seems like the obvious choice for captain.

- the comment about top lines cancelling eachother out in the playoffs is intriguing. It sounds like they want depth, and a bottom 6 that can tilt the ice in their favor. The center spine in it's current state won't do that. Moves need to be made to acquire that type of depth.

Man, am I glad they hired Ruff. He has his warts, but he'll garner a ton of respect from the league and the players. He also is saying a lot of what we've been wanting to see from this team. I have hope he'll be in Adams ear about the type of role players he wants, and Adams will listen. It's why I wanted Gallant, for his philosophy on how to build HIS hockey squad. Ruff has his vision, and if it comes to fruition, the team will be far better off.

Im a bit excited for next year. Let's see what happens during the offseason first, though.
 
Last edited:

HogtownSabresfan

Registered User
Jan 13, 2010
7,088
1,938
Thank god you don't bring extreme bias into literally every post :rolleyes:

Ruff said the opposite of what you wanted to hear. That's life. This talk of a Skinner buyout (not pointing at you) does not seem like a possibility. Given the right odds, like even, I would easily bet against a buyout. Ruff's comments confirm my opinion. Skinner is not going anywhere. Forget the $9M/ year salary. Can Skinner be a positive or a negative? I just don't buy into him as a negative with the current roster, there is just so much crap worse than him we have.
 

Fjordy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2018
16,682
9,121
Ruff said the opposite of what you wanted to hear. That's life. This talk of a Skinner buyout (not pointing at you) does not seem like a possibility. Given the right odds, like even, I would easily bet against a buyout. Ruff's comments confirm my opinion. Skinner is not going anywhere. Forget the $9M/ year salary. Can Skinner be a positive or a negative? I just don't buy into him as a negative with the current roster, there is just so much crap worse than him we have.
If he can contribute and not be lazy, sure, he can. But Adams will have to make sure he adds hard-working players who are tough to play against, and hopefully more than just the fourth line.
 

Dingo44

We already won the trade
Sponsor
Jul 21, 2015
11,429
13,757
Greensboro, NC
Ruff said the opposite of what you wanted to hear. That's life. This talk of a Skinner buyout (not pointing at you) does not seem like a possibility. Given the right odds, like even, I would easily bet against a buyout. Ruff's comments confirm my opinion. Skinner is not going anywhere. Forget the $9M/ year salary. Can Skinner be a positive or a negative? I just don't buy into him as a negative with the current roster, there is just so much crap worse than him we have.

No matter how much you or other people want it, there was zero chance Adams or Ruff were going to bash Skinner or anyone else, or talk about trying to buy out / trade players. It's not going to happen. What Ruff / Adams said or didn't said tells us nothing about what they are planning on doing.
 

HogtownSabresfan

Registered User
Jan 13, 2010
7,088
1,938
No matter how much you or other people want it, there was zero chance Adams or Ruff were going to bash Skinner or anyone else, or talk about trying to buy out / trade players. It's not going to happen. What Ruff / Adams said or didn't said tells us nothing about what they are planning on doing.

Where can I place a bet online on Skinner being bought out? I'd love to buy against that. Will never happen this year. And shouldn't.

If he can contribute and not be lazy, sure, he can. But Adams will have to make sure he adds hard-working players who are tough to play against, and hopefully more than just the fourth line.

Skinner needs a Jochen Hecht player on his line. Have you ever heard Hecht joke about Briere's back-checking? It's pretty funny. Skinner can still be a good even strength. He needs someone that counter balances him
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fjordy

Doug Prishpreed

Registered User
May 1, 2013
10,884
7,383
Brooklyn
Ruff said the opposite of what you wanted to hear. That's life. This talk of a Skinner buyout (not pointing at you) does not seem like a possibility. Given the right odds, like even, I would easily bet against a buyout. Ruff's comments confirm my opinion. Skinner is not going anywhere. Forget the $9M/ year salary. Can Skinner be a positive or a negative? I just don't buy into him as a negative with the current roster, there is just so much crap worse than him we have.
You seem absolutely unhinged...I didn't even mention that he'd be bought out. In fact, I DID mention about a half dozen times in other posts that I don't expect him to be bought out, so I don't know who you are even talking to.

But keep on raging at the things I'm not saying, you sound like you need it.
 

HogtownSabresfan

Registered User
Jan 13, 2010
7,088
1,938
You seem absolutely unhinged...I didn't even mention that he'd be bought out. In fact, I DID mention about a half dozen times in other posts that I don't expect him to be bought out, so I don't know who you are even talking to.

But keep on raging at the things I'm not saying, you sound like you need it.

I'm unhinged? Did you actually read what I wrote? I specifically said NOT POINTING AT YOU...but keep going. I have lost count at how many people in multiple posts say this. I specifically said you were not saying this but it is out there.
 

May Day 10

Registered User
Apr 19, 2006
711
395
St Catharines, ON
It’s really sad.

That is so ridiculous. Buffalo is a one-newspaper town with a local sports radio station where Paul Hamilton is asking the tough questions and he sure doesn't. You have an arrogant columnist at the one paper who thinks his main gig is to insult people on Twitter. Tim Graham is the only guy who has really done any digging on the Sabres and the Pegulas. It's not the media's fault but the lack of scrutiny of the Sabres is part of the disease of complacency in Buffalo. As long as you are not rude, it is completely legit to ask about Ruff's contract (they can say no comment) and it's also legit to ask whether the team will continue to play well under the cap. Most NHL towns, 13 years of no playoffs means tough questions.
The pegulas systematically declawed the local sports media. They played games and started to restrict access to the Buffalo news. Also (I suspect) hung the rights to bills games over wgr's head unless their coverage was favorable. Prior to that you had harrington, Gleason, and Sullivan with tbn making things uncomfortable. Wgr was basically a fire ruff/regier loop for 5 years+. Now, it was basically a hire lindy Ruff informercial for the week leading to his hiring. Harrington carries the sabres' water for them as well. He was overly protective of granato pretty much until the day Ruff became available.

In no other market would a sports team be allowed to be run the way the sabres are, without scrutiny. The complete lack of experience or credentials in the front office, the lack of resources, and the transparent no-search move of bringing back lindy ruff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kirby11

Jeremy2020

Registered User
Dec 27, 2005
3,212
1,192
Austin, TX
Got an invite, but passed on it.

I'd struggle to condense 15 years of frustration into a likely single question that would give an answer to something we don't already know.

I'd need like 90 minutes and a whiteboard.
CliKwk1.png
 

HogtownSabresfan

Registered User
Jan 13, 2010
7,088
1,938
In no other market would a sports team be allowed to be run the way the sabres are, without scrutiny. The complete lack of experience or credentials in the front office, the lack of resources, and the transparent no-search move of bringing back lindy ruff.
I would say this is mostly true. The only cases were it might not be is markets where hockey is a 4h sport or even behind college stuff. Buffalo is a passionate hockey town, though. Maybe hockey is second to the Bills but that's it. It's truly amazing how Pegula isn't roasted around the clock. In Toronto, it would be relentless.
 

Jeremy2020

Registered User
Dec 27, 2005
3,212
1,192
Austin, TX
I would say this is mostly true. The only cases were it might not be is markets where hockey is a 4h sport or even behind college stuff. Buffalo is a passionate hockey town, though. Maybe hockey is second to the Bills but that's it. It's truly amazing how Pegula isn't roasted around the clock. In Toronto, it would be relentless.
..and it's brought them so many cups and a team that isn't massively disappointing!
 

HogtownSabresfan

Registered User
Jan 13, 2010
7,088
1,938
..and it's brought them so many cups and a team that isn't massively disappointing!

I despise the Leafs, and the team is on the other end of the spectrum where players get spotted anywhere in town, and it's on social media. It's really not good for their franchise. But let's not attempt to compare a team that has made the playoffs eight straight years with one that has missed it 13 years in a row. I hate all things Toronto but Sabres fans cannot say boo about first-round exits with Pegula's reign of error. Buffalo is currently the most embarrassing team in the league and the bar is high with teams like Columbus, Ottawa and Calgary. Nobody comes close to Terry. People still claim he saved the Sabres. LOL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doug Prishpreed

May Day 10

Registered User
Apr 19, 2006
711
395
St Catharines, ON
I would say this is mostly true. The only cases were it might not be is markets where hockey is a 4h sport or even behind college stuff. Buffalo is a passionate hockey town, though. Maybe hockey is second to the Bills but that's it. It's truly amazing how Pegula isn't roasted around the clock. In Toronto, it would be relentless.

Even in Buffalo, pre-2017, he would be getting blasted every day, and Adams would be on the hot seat.
Adams gets softballs wherever he goes. If a question gets anywhere near critical, he gets really porky and short. There was a fluff Q&A in TBN yesterday with Adams. I hear him on WGR and they don't challenge him at all (actually Schopp kind of did and Adams' response was they can't go 82-0, you can hear Schopp breathe in, chuckle, and you can tell he wanted to lay into him for the strawman, but he bit his tongue).
Its the same thing with the Bills, although not as irritating because their results are largely great. If anyone asks Mcdermott a tough question, you can tell he gets really irritated and short, and it seems like the "asker" is going to get in trouble with his/her employer for that.

The media painted a picture that Lindy Ruff is some conquering legend here, come back. We pretty much unanimously ran him out of town, and it took a period of 5 years to do it. The media was 100% on board too.


And I agree on the Leafs. Their existence is similar to the Sabres' in the 80s and early 90s. Had some terrific teams, some top-4 teams in the NHL. The problem was, we had Boston and Montreal in a brutal Adams division and Buffalo just couldnt top either of them in the first round for awhile. Those seasons were fun though, and I would take that existence any day of the week over the irrelevancy we have now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doug Prishpreed

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad