Inferno
Registered User
To be fair ..the way that was being defended it looked like a power play to me as well.Even strength, there’s 5 skaters in red
To be fair ..the way that was being defended it looked like a power play to me as well.Even strength, there’s 5 skaters in red
Nah. They never signed a contract with those teams. They never agreed to play for the team at all. In fact they expressed desire to not ever sign for that team and instead that they preferred to play elsewhere. Their only tie to the teams that drafted them was that the teams said their name at the draft. They had a right to not play for the team and they exercised it.Yes, Hayes and Vesey literally quit on their team. They literally walked away from the team that had their rights. Vesey even did it twice. All within their rights of course, using the possibility to opt for UFA status, but they did quit on the team that drafted them
Yes, Hayes and Vesey literally quit on their team. They literally walked away from the team that had their rights. Vesey even did it twice. All within their rights of course, using the possibility to opt for UFA status, but they did quit on the team that drafted them
and why do players owe drafting teams more loyalty than teams owe drafted players, like what NYR showed to Nico Gross, who came overseas for 3 seasons, played in 4 WJCs, and was shunned by his drafting team?
I don't have a problem with guys refusing to sign. Just recently people were speculating Wall wouldn't sign. I didn't think that was going to happen, but if it did, I wouldn't begrudge him. The same with Barron--I'd have been super bummed if he chose to go the UFA route, but, again, that would be his right.This is what i'm always am amazed at. People are basically in favor of servitude with drafted prospects if it helps their team.
I don't have a problem with guys refusing to sign. Just recently people were speculating Wall wouldn't sign. I didn't think that was going to happen, but if it did, I wouldn't begrudge him. The same with Barron--I'd have been super bummed if he chose to go the UFA route, but, again, that would be his right.
Once you sign, though, different story. You gotta play by the rules and obey the terms of the contract. And that goes both ways--guaranteed contract, so the team has to play by the rules, too. And that's why Hayes is different than Lias; Hayes exercised his right under the CBA to not commit to the team that drafted him. Andersson made the decision to enter into a contract with the team that drafted him--and then committed a flagrant breach of the contract.
agreed, signed contracts are a different deal, same with any labor issue.
Could you imagine though if you got out of college at the top of the class in Med School, and you had to go work in some remote hospital in Missouri because they picked you? And if you wanted to go work in NY or Chicago, but you had no choice?
The difference between real life and sports.
and why do players owe drafting teams more loyalty than teams owe drafted players, like what NYR showed to Nico Gross, who came overseas for 3 seasons, played in 4 WJCs, and was shunned by his drafting team?
Although hockey socialism and participation trophies has a ring to it i’m not sure the results would be the perfect system. Any suggestions on what else to do?
i have no idea what the first sentence means
but i have no problem with the system as is,
people who call what Hayes/Vesey did a loophole,
are looking at a single tree, not the forest,
as mentioned, Junior players, actually even most Euro players,
also have draft rights expiration deadlines they can wait out,
and teams have similar options not to proceed
i have no idea what the first sentence means
but i have no problem with the system as is,
people who call what Hayes/Vesey did a loophole,
are looking at a single tree, not the forest,
as mentioned, Junior players, actually even most Euro players,
also have draft rights expiration deadlines they can wait out,
and teams have similar options not to proceed
I think Lundkvist and Henriksson has better advisers. They aren’t signing a contract before they feel it’s time for them to come over. Many NHL organizations are really poorly run, it’s just not us that have made big blunders.
Lundkvist would have signed his ELC if the pandemic didn't affect the entire season in NA.
but because he felt he was ready to come over...he didn't rush over at 18 after the draft. so I think the thought is still valid.
Yep. “Sticking it to him” is pointless on about every level.Because some people are more concerned with spite than they are with making intelligent organizational decisions
How is what these guys did any different than a Major Junior player not signing after his exclusive rights expire?
Yes. Of course. But I think @RangersFan1994 wasn’t saying it as a negative. He was just using the common parlance. I call it a loophole too, reflexively. Even though it’s a completely legit and collectively-bargained feature.It's not a loophole. It's intentional.
Yes. The Rangers fan in me is f***ing annoyed with him to no end. But on a human level, I do feel sympathy for him as he appears to have some internal issues he's working through, and I also think he's maybe not getting the best advice from people in his life.The more I think on the Lias Situation the more I feel sympathy for him. Not in terms of “Lias Versus The Rangers”. I don’t really think the Rangers did anything particularly wrong aside from maybe not messaging sensitively enough for Lias. (And I think they should be tailoring their contact to the individual; Not one-size-fits-all). But Lias really seems to be fighting himself. He doesn’t appear to be in a good space right now. I hope his new path works out for him. A 21 year old pro athlete ought to be having the time of his life right now.
A 21 year old pro athlete ought to be having the time of his life right now.
The more I think on the Lias Situation the more I feel sympathy for him. Not in terms of “Lias Versus The Rangers”. I don’t really think the Rangers did anything particularly wrong aside from maybe not messaging sensitively enough for Lias. (And I think they should be tailoring their contact to the individual; Not one-size-fits-all). But Lias really seems to be fighting himself. He doesn’t appear to be in a good space right now. I hope his new path works out for him. A 21 year old pro athlete ought to be having the time of his life right now.
Yes. The Rangers fan in me is f***ing annoyed with him to no end. But on a human level, I do feel sympathy for him as he appears to have some internal issues he's working through, and I also think he's maybe not getting the best advice from people in his life.
You all are spot on. I don't know (and frankly doubt) if Lias has a future with the Rangers or even in the NHL, and I worry about the kid. At the end of the day the life experience of another human is way more important than the success of a single prospect for my team, as annoyed as I may be with how the whole saga played out.I wonder about that sometimes. We assume that should be true, but how many times do we hear after the fact about guys who washed out or even thrived on the ice while being miserable? Same thing with child actors. We all think it would be great to have fame and money at a young age, but a fairly sizeable percentage of people who ARE famous and rich at a young age see their lives go off the rails. Sometimes its because of toxic/controlling parents/agents. Sometimes it's the pressure. I don't know if I tend towards kindness on this topic because I'm on the older side of the board population (40) and work with this age group (18-22ish), but I'd give the kid another chance and see if I couldn't help him rebuild his bridges.