Larrybiv
We're CLEAN, we PROMISE!
Been thinking about this for years now. Was reminded about it last game. Why doesn't the league/officials give the opportunity to the coaches to CHOOSE whether they want a 2 minute PP chance OR a penalty shot?
Let's pretend it's Rempe or Lindgren that gets pulled down, and a penalty shot is called. Now, if Lavi has a choice, wouldn't he choose a PP opportunity?
Now, if it's Mika, Panarin, Laffy then yeah. Penalty shot it is.
Honestly though, in addition to that........I always believed that if a team MISSES on the penalty shot, they should get the PP opp. as well.
Reason being, WHY should the penalized team get away with that "in the moment" breakaway where it seems to me would be a lot less pressure on the breakaway player than just the equivalent of impending Penalty Shot attempt. ALL EYES and pressure on that player. If you don't score, that's okay, the TEAM still has a chance to score with the PP.
Let's pretend it's Rempe or Lindgren that gets pulled down, and a penalty shot is called. Now, if Lavi has a choice, wouldn't he choose a PP opportunity?
Now, if it's Mika, Panarin, Laffy then yeah. Penalty shot it is.
Honestly though, in addition to that........I always believed that if a team MISSES on the penalty shot, they should get the PP opp. as well.
Reason being, WHY should the penalized team get away with that "in the moment" breakaway where it seems to me would be a lot less pressure on the breakaway player than just the equivalent of impending Penalty Shot attempt. ALL EYES and pressure on that player. If you don't score, that's okay, the TEAM still has a chance to score with the PP.