Bryce Newman
Registered User
- Jan 4, 2021
- 260
- 204
Tim Sweeney was recently asked which NHL Defenseman would he take in his prime: Leetch or Bourque?
I saw this on the main forum and thought I'd pose the question here for older Ranger fans. Notice the question is "in their prime" and not who had the better career.
For me, I'll take Leetch. His prime years of 1992-1997 were a notch higher than Bourque at his best.
Undoubtedly Bourque had the better overall career (in large part, sadly, because of the Rangers "dark years" after Messier left) but we all saw what prime Leetch did in the regular season of 92 (102 points) and playoffs of 94 (34 points and Conn Smythe).
What do you think? Would love to hear older Rangers fans opinions on this.
I saw this on the main forum and thought I'd pose the question here for older Ranger fans. Notice the question is "in their prime" and not who had the better career.
For me, I'll take Leetch. His prime years of 1992-1997 were a notch higher than Bourque at his best.
Undoubtedly Bourque had the better overall career (in large part, sadly, because of the Rangers "dark years" after Messier left) but we all saw what prime Leetch did in the regular season of 92 (102 points) and playoffs of 94 (34 points and Conn Smythe).
What do you think? Would love to hear older Rangers fans opinions on this.