Agreed with all of this.She had her opinion and was certainly passionate about it and entitled to it. I agree with her to a degree but not in this instance.
Bieksa had it spot on. He said pretty much what I thought when I had first seen it. It had nothing to do with a skill play but digging the goalie in a 5-0 game. He deserved a cross check there and that should have been the end of it. I wish the Leafs defense brought more of that when the goalie gets chopped.
Beagle should have let up once he saw who he was engaged with. Looked like he lost control for a minute, I’m sure he regrets it.
Simmonds played the enforcer role perfectly tonight, IMO.
Agree with this, gimme all the in-play physicality and intensity, drop the side show after whistle garbage.Fighting sucks in hockey, boooooring. Like powerbreak to refill your tv snacks. A good hit is a hundred times better. And dont slow the game down.
Hockey is also the only professional sport where you wear knives on your feet and are allowed to hit your opponent into the boards. Your response was contrived, pompous dogmatism and wanting.
FIGHTING IS PART OF THE GAME. If you want figure skating, why are you watching hockey?
Agree with this, gimme all the in-play physicality and intensity, drop the side show after whistle garbage.
If I wanna watch two guys lock up ufc has a fight night every Saturday
You played every skill position at a competeuve level? Lol I’m sure. We’re not talking about thanksgiving touch football with the family here.Not sure squatting into a three point stance 75 times, moving a total of 6 inches each squat, in 3 hours is considered "playing" a sport but you do you. I played end, safety, RB, QB and Wide out... do I win something?
Then I'll change my name to Abe Simpson and yell louder.They won't be there to listen.
You would yelling at clouds.
Some around here would suggest otherwise. It’s the code.Nobody wants to see Terry beaten up by Beagle. Physicality and intensity is what is exciting. Should be a great game tomorrow night.
You played every skill position at a competeuve level? Lol I’m sure. We’re not talking about thanksgiving touch football with the family here.
No you don’t deserve or win anything as it’s pointless, just like me playing high level football twenty years ago and just like anyone here gatekeeping the game with bullshit comments like “if you didn’t play you don’t understand” or “a woman should stick to opinions on the womens game” it just comes across with as really lacking overall and is a great example why this sport lags behind the rest in popularity
this is what I said during the gameMissed most of the game - how was Jack?
He's seeing the puck well
Rebound control is good
Not overplaying
WOW .... just WOW.... LOL ... sure any logical person would come to that conclusion that this is what I was inferring ... WOW ... I've never been left speechless by another poster before.... just WOW..Knives on your feet? So you’re suggesting the next logical step is the players use their feet as weapons if they’re denied the right to pound each other’s faces in with impunity?
There are other sports where you can justifiably smoke someone as hard through the field of play as in any hockey hit. Just a heads up, you don’t look tough or more manly trying to infer I should watch figure skating, you just look like an asshole.
Not one single person has ever insisted taking out the physicality and competitiveness of the sport, just the sideshow goonery.
Go through the Gdt your knuckle dragging buddies we’re all losing their collective minds when botterill made the comments she did.Is University competitive level? If so, yeah for me...
Quote one person that said a woman should stick to opinions on the womans game... your hyperbolic nature does not help you.
The person I’m quoting said that hockey is also only the only sport with knives on the athletes feet, so I’m curious what exactly that means? What’s the point of that tidbit? Unless they’re suggesting somehow they would become a factor in a different manner than they already are by removing the sideshow antics?WOW .... just WOW.... LOL ... sure any logical person would come to that conclusion that this is what I was inferring ... WOW ... I've never been left speechless by another poster before.... just WOW..
Okay, and what happens then when another NHLer inevitably agrees with Boterill, which would happen. Bieksa is no authority on what is best for hockey.
And there is nothing remotely manipulative about what I said. Several people on this board have made their viewpoint regarding Boterill and virtually all women we see on the broadcast very clear. Which is why I said SOME
The idea that Bieksa’s opinions automatically hold more water in all NHL matters because he played and someone else didn’t is asinine
Go through the Gdt your knuckle dragging buddies we’re all losing their collective minds when botterill made the comments she did.
You played QB at the university level while also playing multiple positions? I GUESS.
The person I’m quoting said that hockey is also only the only sport with knives on the athletes feet, so I’m curious what exactly that means? What’s the point of that tidbit? Unless they’re suggesting somehow they would become a factor in a different manner than they already are by removing the sideshow antics?
Nylander took some pucks, bumps and fist bumps these last few games. Maintenance?
So find a former NHLer that agrees with Boterill, I bet for everyone you find I can find 50 that agree with Bieska. This would suggest that Botterill's comments are outliers , while Bieska's are generally the prevailing POV for current and former hockey players.
That would be perfect. It wasn’t perfect.Adding to it that we came out of the TDL without trading:
Knies, 1st, Topi, Robertson, Hirvonen Liljegren, Sandin, and Holmberg? That's a sweep of the Yankees, Red Sox, and Rays......
Agree 100%. That incident was absolutely disgusting. I think hockey could do without fighting, just like the UFC is doing fine without hockey. And if there is to be fighting in hockey then two willing participants going at it is one thing, watching some thug beating up on a guy much smaller than him who clearly doesn't want to fight is another.Agree with this, gimme all the in-play physicality and intensity, drop the side show after whistle garbage.
If I wanna watch two guys lock up ufc has a fight night every Saturday
That's not really a thing to gauge whether something in the game should change. If you would go through the decades and ask players about some sort of change, most usually resist.
As I stated before, all the information relevant to having an opinion here is plainly visible. Bieksa’s experience doesn’t hold any value to this particular debate
And again, I ask what happens when inevitably other NHLers agree with Boterill? Because plenty will.