Pre-Game Talk: Leafs vs Oilers

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.

Wonder if they are going through some trezades sire. Ritchie might be gone at deadline, if he ain't gangstaying it up more than this... he should be scoring more also sire. But yeah, we already have enough gangstas, so don't you worry bout a damn thang. Lets see what dubas does here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: supermann_98
Wonder if they are going through some trezades sire. Ritchie might be gone at deadline, if he ain't gangstaying it up more than this... he should be scoring more also sire. But yeah, we already have enough gangstas, so don't you worry bout a damn thang. Lets see what dubas does here.

Every time there is a guy missing from practice there is always going to be at least one person who thinks it is going to be a trade :laugh:

This is not really the time to move Ritchie unless Rutherford is offering up something nice from Vancouver ;)
 

Pleasently surprised Keefe didn't stick with Muzzin-Holl. Mikhayev has taken Ritchie's spot.


Leafs really need to acquire a center for depth. Easier said than done I suppose.

Engvall showed he's just not an every day center, and I know Seney or Steeves are not centers either. For a few games, it's not that big of a deal I guess.
 
Leafs really need to acquire a center for depth. Easier said than done I suppose.

Engvall showed he's just not an every day center, and I know Seney or Steeves are not centers either. For a few games, it's not that big of a deal I guess.

Kerfoot 'can' play there... but I think we all agree he is way better on the wing. Spezza can play it as well (4th line only). Not sure many teams have that kind of depth and I think we have other pressing needs (top 4 D perhaps) but it is a good observation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egd27
Leafs really need to acquire a center for depth. Easier said than done I suppose.

Engvall showed he's just not an every day center, and I know Seney or Steeves are not centers either. For a few games, it's not that big of a deal I guess.
I want them to give SDA a call up to try at C for a couple games
 
  • Like
Reactions: Atomos2
With practice lines....

Screenshot_20211213-170006_Sheets.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: mclaren55
Kerfoot 'can' play there... but I think we all agree he is way better on the wing. Spezza can play it as well (4th line only). Not sure many teams have that kind of depth and I think we have other pressing needs (top 4 D perhaps) but it is a good observation.

That would be a bad idea. 4th line center role isn't THAT important to put someone like Kerfoot there. You just need someone that understands the position and with some sort of track record... but maybe Steeves or Seney can fill in fine for ~7-9 minutes.

I do think we miss that center depth player that can split time between Marlies and the Leafs. Someone like Amadio would be perfect right now. It's hard to pluck up decent centers on the waiver wire when you're at the bottom.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: wingman75
How is it not the same thing? You say they are simply due for a win? Are the Leafs not due to win a playoff series if the whole reason you think the Oilers are due to win is because of their losing streak?

No team is due anything. You get what you put in.

The Islanders were "due" to win against us in their new arena after losing so many games and even after losing to us, they lost about 5 more times before they won the game they were due.

It's just a figure of speech, no need for deep analysis over semantics.
 
Leafs really need to acquire a center for depth. Easier said than done I suppose.

Engvall showed he's just not an every day center, and I know Seney or Steeves are not centers either. For a few games, it's not that big of a deal I guess.

I don't take this move like that at all - Engvall is more than good enough as the extra center imo.

This move is more about getting a look at a very interesting possible checking li e with engvall-kampf-mikheyev which I've been wanting to see and could be a fierce possession line.

And which frees Kase up and maybe keep him in the top there or give us a chance at putting another effective scoring line using Spezza with Kase/Kerfoot and Ritchie/Simmonds.

I think these new lines here is Keefe complimenting Engvall not disappointment with his work at C.
 


I mean their depth forwards do stink (they have one good player in the bottom 6 in Foegele but he's actually one of their top 6 forwards because Yamamoto is actually terrible even if in the bottom 6)...but this is still taking plenty of responsibility off of their Big 2 who are nowhere near as dominant 5v5 as their reputation suggests.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hockeywiz542
I mean their depth forwards do stink (they have one good player in the bottom 6 in Foegele but he's actually one of their top 6 forwards because Yamamoto is actually terrible even if in the bottom 6)...but this is still taking plenty of responsibility off of their Big 2 who are nowhere near as dominant 5v5 as their reputation suggests.

I don't get it with the Oilers. You'd think it would be easier for them to have McDavid, Draisaitl buy into a two way concept and try to win more lower scoring, low event games with two gamebreakers at their disposal. But the constant complaint would have you think they're trying to build 4 lines that can win a track meet.
 
I don't get it with the Oilers. You'd think it would be easier for them to have McDavid, Draisaitl buy into a two way concept and try to win more lower scoring, low event games with two gamebreakers at their disposal. But the constant complaint would have you think they're trying to build 4 lines that can win a track meet.

Yeah it's not like they don't score enough even with a useless bottom 6 - so just get a bottom 6 that can play D. It's not expensive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad