Honestly, I genuinely understand where you are coming from and I love the fact that Keefe appears to be the type of coach that tries to keep the foot on the gas despite the results. I think that was clearly evident last season in the All or Nothing series. It was something that I actually was not expecting from Keefe, but was pleasantly surprised.
I just don't think that's a spot you have that stance. It was as dominating a 60 minutes the team has had all year. To me it's always process over outcome. That process was very good IMO.
We can say we didn't make it hard enough on the tendy all we want, I disagree. We had 22 HDCF in the game and a large amount of them were within 8-10 feet of the net.
I am all for Keefe holding them accountable when they need it, even after a win. For example I would have been ok with that level of public emotion after the VGK game. Sloppy 3rd lead to a much harder 2pts.
We did everything right yesterday, and didn't get rewarded.
I think I am most upset about the Mrazek slight personally. We are going to need Petr down the stretch, especially if Jack gets hurt. I didn't like the GWG, and blame him the most personally. It's an easy read cross crease and did not require an attempt to poke check. It was a terrible read on Petr's end. He knows that. He doesn't need his coach to give the public a soundbite to run with. Doesn't get a better version of Petr next time around. Serves no purpose
You are not 100% wrong but to be fair not many teams lose to the mess that is Arizona
I would agree with the guy, and it isnt based solely on this loss. It is how we just regularly fail when we shouldn’t.
Getting into positions where you should win is so hard in this league, if you are throwing those away you wont win anything when the games get infinitely tighter.
Ya I hear ya. It was just a terribly timed loss in focus on Petr's end. He said as much in his post game presser. It's just not a goal that can go in at that moment. So I understand Keefe's frustration, I really do. Petr has to make that save.Fair enough, appreciate your take. Maybe its the disgruntled leaf fan in me, I have gotten to a point now that I no longer care for any coddling or even being easy on members of this team. Play well, we'll love you, play like crap, we'll call you out. I really want Mrazek to be better and even feel he will be given how long a break he just came out from, but when the team has almost dominated the entire game as you point out, you can't let in the literal 2 chances the opposing team gets (maybe there was 3 or 4, but you get my point).
Highest win% for Leaf coaches all time. Yeah, he sucks.1. Look at the team he was handed
2. Look at how easily he gets out coached in the playoffs
Decent coach, terrible tactician
The optics look terrible, but the Coyotes had no business winning that game last night.
Who knew their sub par goaltender was going to channel his inner Georges Vezina?
Oh shit, now you got me second guessing myself. Usually being on the same side as Craig Button is a bad thing lol
There is one thing to look into it about.Every team outplays a team and loses occasionally, yes even contenders. there is precisely nothing to read into it
Ya I am just playing. I agree he can make some decent points from time to time. He just has some hot takes that are the ones people tend to remember. I actually enjoyed listening to him and Andi Petrillo on Leafs lunch last year. It was a fairly good dynamic, and I think that's where Craig does his best work. But his in between period analysis can sometimes be a bit nauseating to listen tolol nah, he was right and you were right. People just hate on him for no reason, he does have a lot of insightful things to say it's just he yells because it's his thing. It's what gets clicks, but often times hes right or provides good insight. He's also very knowledgeable about prospects
There is one thing to look into it about.
Whenever a team plays a "defense first" trap style game (ie. playoff hockey) against the leafs, the opposing goalie is all of a sudden a vezina winner. Even if it's a non-contending worse team in the league with 10 regulars out due to covid.
Highest win% for Leaf coaches all time. Yeah, he sucks.
If you say soAt the end of the day its a coin flip, in head to head matches, Its neck and neck for league standings. A series between the 2 would be a coin flip as well.
Just like I defended the Leafs after the Colorado game based on the lopsided shot count, I feel like I need to dial back a little bit of the “domination” talk people are talking about after the Arizona game.
They did put a lot of pressure on the Yotes, did hit some posts and miss some chances and did get goalie’d to some degree, but I think there were also a lot of the game play that wasn’t “domination” but more like mechanical, perimeter puck possession and high volume shooting. Like it looks good on paper but if you stayed up to watch it, you were bored to death at the slow pacing of the play and the box out.
Just reminds me of the CBJ/Montreal playbook against this team. You think you dominated but really just got wrestled down to the mat by a low skill team wasting time on the outside and padding someone’s save totals.
Dzingel from Lilljgren and DermottGuy lets in 2 goals and the hordes are on him. Was it Dermott who got the assist on Yotes 1st?
This team wins by scoring and loses by failing to.
Hands up if you're surprised that Mess doesn't really follow the league and hadn't heard of the guy that pitched a 46 save shutout earlier this year, with multiple monstrous games against good teams
I'd say the great majority have never heard of the guy and pretty much everyone else is lying.Vez-melka, as the Fantasy crowd calls him facetiously has a 3.17 GAA after last nights game and a .910 SV% and 4 career wins in 18 games. Mess, or anybody else is entitled to not know who the heck he is. He’s not the goalie equivalent of an indie band only the cool kids know about (yet).
Karel Vejmelka Game by Game Stats and Performance | ESPN
I'd say the great majority have never heard of the guy and pretty much everyone else is lying.