We boo'd him out of the Gardens and he went on to win two more cups U believe and go into the Hall of Fame. A very Leafy thing to do but I don't think we retired his jerseyWe didn't retire Murphy's number?
Short isn’t small. 190 at 5’9” is heavy and he plays like it.
I’ve seen 5’9”, 184lb Brendan Ghallagher barrel through NHL defensemen a hell of a lot harder than 6’5”, 240lb Freddy Gauthier.
Our forward group isn't small. Theyre soft. Engvall is a big guy who's never done anything to use his size.
It’s even more Leafy then all that, you’re leaving out that we paid Detroit to take him (retained salary) and got jack diddly squat back.We boo'd him out of the Gardens and he went on to win two more cups U believe and go into the Hall of Fame. A very Leafy thing to do but I don't think we retired his jersey
Short isn’t small. 190 at 5’9” is heavy and he plays like it.
I’ve seen 5’9”, 184lb Brendan Ghallagher barrel through NHL defensemen a hell of a lot harder than 6’5”, 240lb Freddy Gauthier.
not addressing goaltending seems crazy
as nice as is to see Gio as a Leaf seems like we just wasted couple 2nds and dermott for another early exit
pressure is on Campbell to come back and return to form it looks like
Physics is physics, is 5'9 Brendan Gallagher going to barrel through Chara? I certainly understand your point and compete is never a bad thing but there are very few short players who can physically dominate a larger player. I have no idea who this new guy is, I hope he proves that he is the exception to the rule.
I think most Leaf fans already know why we are going to fail in the playoffs. Dubas will, as he always does, fix last seasons problem, next summer. Not addressing what next seasons problem will be.
I’m not trying to say anyone is right or wrong here, but this post made me think of this and it’s always fun.Physics is physics, is 5'9 Brendan Gallagher going to barrel through Chara? I certainly understand your point and compete is never a bad thing but there are very few short players who can physically dominate a larger player. I have no idea who this new guy is, I hope he proves that he is the exception to the rule.
I’m not trying to say anyone is right or wrong here, but this post made me think of this and it’s always fun.
Physics is physics, is 5'9 Brendan Gallagher going to barrel through Chara? I certainly understand your point and compete is never a bad thing but there are very few short players who can physically dominate a larger player. I have no idea who this new guy is, I hope he proves that he is the exception to the rule.
Anything looks good if you set the bar low enough.If Muzzin comes back healthy is this the best Leafs D since the early 2000s? Maybe more?
That better not be a Wade Belak insult.Anything looks good if you set the bar low enough.
I'd rather have Gallagher than the 6'5 200ish pound Freddy the Goat.
Playing style means more than raw size.
In your reasoning please explain Martin St Pierre.I'd rather have 6' 3" Auston Matthews than 5'9" Brendan Gallagher. Gallagher has more skill than Freddie, not a reasonable comparison at all. Skill means more than playing style. If you have two players who are equal skill one guy is 5'9 170lbs and the other is 6'5 240lbs, and they have a corner battle the bigger guy will win more times than the smaller guy. If you got the same two guys in a net front presence, the bigger guy will win 99.9% of the time.
That better not be a Wade Belak insult.
lol..
Yushkevich from that era is one of the best Leaf Dman I've had the privilege to watch tho, in all seriousness.
There is something to do be said for leverage and catching a guy off balance.In your reasoning please explain Martin St Pierre.
Size does help but in not an indicator of strength.
To quote godfather Lou, he has hockey strength
I have a lower center of gravity then you do. You are right, physics dont lie.I'm over 6 foot and 225lbs and I've never run into a 5'8 guy who was as tough as he thought he was, the little guys usually end up on their assess., cause they like to chirp and prove something to the bigger guys. I got 45 lbs on you, sorry but you may be feisty but physics don't lie.
I don't like this deal. I don't like any deal that involves multiple 2nd rounders for one player. This smells like the Foligno trade, including the overtly positive spin on it by fans and media.
Could have gotten Braun (3rd) and Motte (4th) instead, and the Leafs would still have their 2nds. Give me a steady stream of Knies and Robertson level prospects over a 39 year old rental.