zeke
The Dube Abides
- Mar 14, 2005
- 66,937
- 36,957
So what you're saying is on paper he's our new Cody Ceci right? Sound's good!!![]()
![]()
Cody was more comparable to Boosh.
So what you're saying is on paper he's our new Cody Ceci right? Sound's good!!![]()
![]()
Yeah Brodie-Holl was the main shutdown pairing the last few weeks before Muzz came back. They were very good.
Fully healthy defence core, what do your Game 1 Round 1 pairings look like?
You would have Boosh out? I thought he was sorely missed.I liked last game's pairings but I'm willing to see some experimenting.
7-0-1Leafs are 7-0-1 vs teams like Tampa, Florida, Carolina, Boston in their last 8 games, they are coming from sandy sunny FLA, hot hot hot Texas country women , soooooo many distractions... ... I can guaranteed you that I cannot predict the futureusually i can read teams, this years Leafs, when I think they are gonna choke they man up and kick ass, when I think they are goign to dominate they choke... I think they are goign to dominate tonight .. so that would mean they are going to choke
![]()
He was. Has been better than expected. Zeke is just anti-boosh. Probably because he doesn't fit his descriptive statistics narrative.You would have Boosh out? I thought he was sorely missed.
Gee and look how that turned outThis better be one game. If Holl fails here, he should be out. If not, than Keefe's fascination with him is on the same level as Babcock's was with Hyman.
You would have Boosh out? I thought he was sorely missed.
Gee and look how that turned out
I kinda agree with him though to be honest. It's not a slouch on Lybush - he's an NHL dman, but who else would you sit out? Holl? Liljegren?He was. Has been better than expected. Zeke is just anti-boosh. Probably because he doesn't fit his descriptive statistics narrative.
Pretty sure they were paired against Boston and TBayHave we ever seen Brodie-Holl? I feel like that might be a sensible pairing. They would be good a breaking out and neither shy away from being hit against aggressive forechecks.
I guess it's not really possible with Muzz coming back on the left side.
For Hyman more than for us. He was dragging the top line down in the playoffs, IMO. Defenders were sagging off him and checking MAtthews/Marner. I am hoping with Bunting up there, that defenders won't sag off him as much as they did with Hyman.
They do need crease cleaners and while Lube engages on a fairly regular basis, Muzzin hasn't been that guy in a while. Gio gets involved, but that's about it among the Dmen. This is what Dubas hockey is, I think they need to change it to at least 10 guys on the team that play with physicality, as it stands there's really only 6 who play that way now and two of them are regular scratches.To me, you need guys like Boosh and Muzz in there come playoff time. Assuming of course Muzz is back to.himself.
People under estimate how much Keefe loves Holl
Boosh may not have the greatest ADV stats but his mere presence makes people play differently, to a lesser extent, Blackwell as well.
I don't think we underestimated it, but one can hope
For me, if Muzz can't turn it around, tbh sadly I think his tank is emptyI kinda agree with him though to be honest. It's not a slouch on Lybush - he's an NHL dman, but who else would you sit out? Holl? Liljegren?
The thing is, Boosh needs a mobile d-man to play alongside and the only mobile D we have on the left side is Rielly. You're forcing our top pairing to be weaker by playing him with Rielly. As good as boosh has been, he's not a top pairing d-man.
It's also hard to play him with Muzzin/Gio for the reasons talked about. If Muzzin gets injured again come playoffs and Sandin slots in - then I 100% agree I'd rather Sandin - Lybushkin rather than Sandin - Holl/Liljegren.
Come playoffs this should be the line-up:
Rielly - Brodie
Muzzin - Holl/Lybush
Gio - Liljegren
So you want wins and mentioned hits as an indicator of what you need, yet Muzzin had 7 hits and was on the ice for 5 goals against last game lol More hits means you don't have the puck as often.Muzzin in his first game back lead the Leafs with seven hits. You put Lybushkin in and you have another 5+ hits. That type of banging is going to pay dividends in a series on top of them moving bodies from the crease. Then the other players get in the action as they see that heavy checks are normalized.
IMO both The Bear and Muzzin are critical types to have in the playoffs. Absolutely critical. I don't even want to see the advanced stats come post season, only one stat matters...Wins. By any means.
I want to trust Keefe, I've respected his decisions and he knows the team in ways we don't. The one disagreement I had with him was in the playofrs last year when he put in Sandin over Dermott after they shut out the Habs.
His D is tougher now, let no fan be enamoured with too much flash on the backend when the game gets in the trenches. Playoff winners almost always have guys who are bruised up and who are laying bruises on others.
No dirty stuff or stick work, just hard, willing combatants who hate to lose.
Muzzin needs some games to get his legs back. 5-8 games we should be able to better judge where he's headed, to 4 or tire fireI'm fine with Lilly sitting tonight IF it means we're going to regularly rotate. However if he sits Saturday as well, we riot.
Muzzin, Holl, Boosh and Lilly can all rotate. Rielly, Brodie and Gio should be the only ones safe from being scratched*
*in my world Lilly would also be safe but c'est la vie. And I fear Muzzin will be safe no matter how poorly he plays unfortunately
I am all for toughness but to be fair Lilly is tougher that Holl and way better at moving the puckThis lineup looks strong and I like it (would like to see Clifford on the wing but I am splitting hairs).
Sorry folks. I really like Lilly, he and Sandin will play key roles in this teams future but playoffs will be a mans game. Five years of this core losing? They need all the tough players they can muster.
Please, think back to the types that run us over in the playoffs.
So you want wins and mentioned hits as an indicator of what you need, yet Muzzin had 7 hits and was on the ice for 5 goals against last game lol More hits means you don't have the puck as often.
Get the puck. I don't care if you have 0 hits if you don't get scored on.
7 hits I saw that, who was he hitting exactly considering the 5ga'sSo you want wins and mentioned hits as an indicator of what you need, yet Muzzin had 7 hits and was on the ice for 5 goals against last game lol More hits means you don't have the puck as often.
Get the puck. I don't care if you have 0 hits if you don't get scored on.