That stat is meaningless. A bunch of teams lost 20+ 1 goal games. I remember counting the Oilers 1 goal losses and it was in the twenties also.
Leafs are definitely bottom 5 this year so that means getting first overall is likely.
No such thing as a meaningless stat, although if you could provide proof that the Leafs were within the norm of 1 goal game losses, I'd be interested in looking at that.
They're barely bottom 5 in the east and let's also keep in mind that they blew 4 leads already, they could easily have anywhere from 4-8 more points.
Remember when the Avs were a powerhouse?
They were able to deal roster players for good picks/prospects because they had an equal or better prospect ready to make his mark.
That's the kind (or close to it) of talent pool the Leafs should be targeting especially in a cap era and they're years away from being there.
No, carry on building with draft picks and development. It may not be the fastest way to become a contender but it has a good chance at success.
That makes sense, but simultaneously if someone wants to gamble more on the pick and they have something to give back, why not?
This is asinine.
Thirteen games into the season the Leafs have absolutely no idea where they will draft.
It would be beyond belief that the Leafs would even think of trading a firster now.
Wow, I guess because you said it, it must be so.
Neither do the other teams, so if they think they're worse than they are and want to offer more, the Leafs should entertain it.
Why? Just Why? This thead doesn't need to be made.
I'm probably one of the biggest leaf fans who posts on the main's consistently, but while we probably aren't a bottom feeder this year, we most likely fall in the 5 to 15 range. This means we are in lotto territory. The only piece I could see the Leafs moving this for is a top pairing RHD, and flat out, a team isn't moving that for an undetermined pick by a team coached by Babcock.
You don't know that, let them make an offer, there seems to be many here who think they're going to be bottom 5 or even worse, so it shouldn't be a strange opinion around the league, therefore they can offer something good back.
Trading your first round pick after finishing dead last just months earlier seems like a bad idea. Or a Burke type of move. Same thing.
That's not a hard line rule.
The Leafs have among the best front offices in the league, they improved their D with the addition of Zaitsev, they improved their goaltending and they added 3 guys who could arguably win the Calder.
Burke's organization is completely different.
Not trading your 1st rounder at this point is very constructive. Assuming you want to construct a good team of course.
Glad we agree
Yeah, let's keep a pick that likely won't be in the league for the next 2-3 years and who knows what they'll develop into vs potentially getting offers from other teams, smart move.
First off, you're missing a big name in Rielly from the "everything else is also up for grabs."
Secondly, Leafs would be moronic to trade their 1st round pick right now. No team is giving up the kind of asset you'd want for that pick, without knowing where it will be.
Third, I like how you say there's no hope that the Leafs get the first overall pick. You know that all non-playoff teams get a shot at that pick, right? Leafs could easily be a bottom 5 team when the year ends (given them a legit chance to move up).
The only way the Leafs trade that pick is if it's top3/top-5 protected, and as soon as those conditions are added, the trade value drops significantly.
If a team thinks they're a bottom feeder and they want the pick, they would.
And if the other team thinks the Leafs are worse than they are, let them make a good offer. This isn't a bottom feeder team, but if another org wants to chance that, let them.
It's a weak draft, some of the top guys might not even be top 3-5 in the past few drafts. It'd be stupid not to listen to offers if a team wants to make it.