TheGreatOne11
Registered User
Don't know if this is relevant enough for its own thread or been posted somewhere before.
Kind of B.S we have a back to back and a possibility of a game 7 back to back.
Last edited:
Leaf first round playoff schedule
- Thread starter TheGreatOne11
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Don't know if this is relevant enough for its own thread or been posted somewhere before.
Kind of B.S we have a back to back and a possibility of a game 7 back to back.
nsleaf
Registered User
- Oct 21, 2009
- 4,122
- 1,538
Um, that schedule can't be right?, 7 games(if it goes that far) in 10 nights, the last 5 to be played in 6 nights??
TheGreatOne11
Registered User
crump
~ ~ (ړײ) ~ ~
Not to mention they have to time-travel back to play game 7 in that first CBS graphic.
TheGreatOne11
Registered User
Lol yeah i noticed that after, don't you underestimate my leafs though. We could do it.
The Iceman
Registered User
- Sep 22, 2007
- 5,352
- 4,078
Boost ratings, game 7 is always a big draw. Why not host it before game 6
Jimmy Firecracker
Backcheck, Forecheck, Paycheque.
That the Canadian teams have to play back to backs in the playoffs is the biggest f***ing joke imaginable. f*** this stupid league, who gives a shit about the Flames and Canucks? Start us earlier so we don’t have to play back to back nights. It should never happen in the playoffs.
Egghead1999
Registered User
- Nov 9, 2007
- 3,245
- 906
Ya,
then, I heard on the local radio, all 4 Canada teams pushed for an earlier start. So, we may see game 1 on Wednesday night since Canucks / Calgary will finish their season Wednesday afternoon.
TheGreatOne11
Registered User
1 billion % agree.
How can they think this is fair and a level playing field when we are the only group that has to play back to backs?
This s*hit can decide a series and since all of our backups have been travestys lately it leaves a bad feeling in my mouth.
What a joke.
TheGreatOne11
Registered User
I hope this is true and they are lobbying for the earlier start to avoid that SILLY STUPID ASSININE back to back.
MSZ
Car guy
hamzarocks
Registered User
By the time the 2nd half of the back to back will be played leafs will be completing the sweep.
Leafs just got to play their game. We have a huge advantage at basically every position and the only way we lose or this series goes long is if we shoot ourselves in the foot with bad decisions and have trouble finishing routine danger chances again
Leafs just got to play their game. We have a huge advantage at basically every position and the only way we lose or this series goes long is if we shoot ourselves in the foot with bad decisions and have trouble finishing routine danger chances again
Bellzy
It was 4-1 finally has better meaning….
- Jun 30, 2018
- 271
- 254
Hey guys, both teams are playing the back to back lol. And we’re the better one
JayfromNB1219
Registered User
Yes and wear and tear adds up quickly in the playoffs so it makes sense to say something when the only division playing any back to backs is the Canadian one...no reason not to start the playoffs with the rest seeing as it’s all locked in and the ‘nucks v flames game means literally nothing
Menzinger
Kessel4LadyByng
If one back-to-back is going to destroy a team for the whole playoffs, then that team probably doesn't deserve to win anything.
Hockey Crazy
Registered User
- Dec 30, 2008
- 2,942
- 2,071
Jimmy Firecracker
Backcheck, Forecheck, Paycheque.
> Be a top NHL player, make the playoffs
> 1st RD features a b2b
> Unusual but you’re a pro, deal with it
> 2nd game of b2b, both teams exhausted
> Out of fatigue, opponent makes dumb play injuring you
> You’re out for the season but team moves on
> Team can’t handle adversity of losing you, loses in round 2 or 3
> Sit at home watching on TV, knowing you could’ve made a difference
> Rojac: If a back to back destroys you, you don’t deserve to win
> YFW
Unless a team loses more than two of their top 5 or so players, they should still be able to be competitive. If they can't then that lack of depth is an issue.
And if a team falls apart because of losing one top player, they're not much of a team.
Egghead1999
Registered User
- Nov 9, 2007
- 3,245
- 906
Campbell is 4-1-1 against Montreal this year (.918, 2.16)
Andersen is 3-1-0 against Montreal this year (.912, 2.73)
I'm not particularly worried.
