lanceuppercut75
Registered User
DISCLAIMER - I'm not a Tampa or Colorado fan.
I read somewhere last month that Colorado may or may not be putting Landeskog on their trade block.
I feel that the Lightning want to win badly and will be going all-in (except for trading Bishop away). I also feel that Landeskog would be a great fit, assuming Drouin can play C or RW.
Colorado would probably ask for a left D.
Palat - Johnson - Kucherov
Landeskog - Drouin - Stamkos
Filppula - Namestnikov - Callahan
or
Palat - Johnson - Kucherov
Landeskog - Stamkos - Drouin
Filppula - Namestnikov - Callahan
SO...
What does it take?
Killorn + Koekkoek?
Killorn + Nesterov + 2nd/Erne?
Less? More?
IF the Avalanche prefer Filppula over Soderberg then both could possibly be added into the deal to give Colorado more value. Not sure that's the case though.
Thoughts?
I read somewhere last month that Colorado may or may not be putting Landeskog on their trade block.
I feel that the Lightning want to win badly and will be going all-in (except for trading Bishop away). I also feel that Landeskog would be a great fit, assuming Drouin can play C or RW.
Colorado would probably ask for a left D.
Palat - Johnson - Kucherov
Landeskog - Drouin - Stamkos
Filppula - Namestnikov - Callahan
or
Palat - Johnson - Kucherov
Landeskog - Stamkos - Drouin
Filppula - Namestnikov - Callahan
SO...
What does it take?
Killorn + Koekkoek?
Killorn + Nesterov + 2nd/Erne?
Less? More?
IF the Avalanche prefer Filppula over Soderberg then both could possibly be added into the deal to give Colorado more value. Not sure that's the case though.
Thoughts?