FrozenRoyalty
Registered User
- Feb 5, 2008
- 1,903
- 565
This title is bad and you should feel bad.
I stand by the story I wrote after last year's playoffs, and I stand by this one, along with its headline.
Fact is, elite players don't go into 34-game slumps at the most crucial time of the season, especially when it was confirmed that he was not injured.
Those of you who are of the OPINION that he was injured have nothing to support that claim. Multiple sources, all the way up to Dean Lombardi, confirmed that he was not injured, including the player. This all happened after the season ended, when there was no reason to hide an injury.
I think the elite thing is all semantics so I'm not going to battle that because I think it's fair to say he's working his way back up in the general fan's eyes.
I don't like selective stat picking, though. Kopitar's goals-per-game were down last season and he had a bad playoffs statistically, yet his production in the regular season was right on pace with his normal production, even despite the eye test on his play and injury speculation. "34-game slump" is a little disingenuous because it makes it sound like he didn't score at all when your readers would have to surf to another article for context.
Props for sticking to your guns on everything else, though. Many writers flip-flop out of convenience.
Yeah, I don't see how a two way center who has led the team in scoring every year isn't elite, slump notwithstanding. That's just my opinion.
Yeah, I don't see how a two way center who has led the team in scoring every year isn't elite, slump notwithstanding. That's just my opinion.
I already voiced how I felt about it on twitter. All due respect to Gann I disagree strongly.
Just as it's hasty to pin an elite tag on a player after 32 games, it's hasty to take it away. Kopitar's numbers and performances (be it advanced stats, eye test, scoring numbers) are consistent from 2010-11 all the way through to now. The only dip in the graph is 2012-13 playoffs, which was incredibly brutal for a number of reasons. He is elite. Has been for years.
![]()
No disrespect sensed from here...
Besides, if everyone agreed on everything, there would be nothing to debate. Talk about boring...
But EVERYONE knows Jason sucks.![]()
So if a player leads a team in scoring every year, but they never make the playoffs, he'e elite, too? That is what you're saying...
I said two way center. And I said every year. The exception being his rookie year. Since he was a rookie, though, he outscored the second highest player on the team by numbers such as 6, 7, 16, 17, 20, 22 points.
Players who are strong defensively naturally sacrifice scoring for the overall chance of the team winning. To make that sacrifice AND to lead a team in scoring consistently, especially a playoff team, is pretty elite in my books.
I don't think either Bergeron nor Toews has ever lead their team in scoring (I checked this and Toews DID lead the team once) yet are considered elite for their two way play. Seems like Kopitar should get similar recognition.
Regular seasons really don't make a player elite, in my book. It's part of it, but most of it has to do with what they do in the playoffs. IMHO.
Sensationalism might draw blog hits but it also causes me to be skeptical.
So after much thought here is how I have decided to deal with this.
You won't be getting a blog hit from me even though some of what you have written in the past has been good. And probably won't for sometime.
Blog hits are money for you. So if you really don't agree with what he is saying here just don't give him the money with the hits.
Note that I didn't say it was a "goal scoring slump..."
Easiest job ever done.
The guy has been "elite" since his first NHL game. Pretty easy to see.