bland
Registered User
- Jul 1, 2004
- 8,293
- 12,702
I am not arguing with you as much as I am tired of the constant search for numbers that contradict reality as a crutch for an opinion, this is just an example and not even an important one.Did you even read what I wrote above in this thread? He's played like shit this year overall and I never said otherwise. I understand this can be difficult for some, but it's possible to appreciate nuance enough to hold two thoughts in my head at once: (1) he's been terrible overall, with an extraordinary level of lack of effort; (2) he's capable of and has generated quality chances off of his carrying the puck into the zone.
And while others whose opinions are always respectable disagree with this idea, I will state with absolute certainty that this reliance on data in sports is not helpful to understanding its nature and actual purpose.
We don't watch sports for perfection. We watch them for the drama, the familiar camaraderie, perseverance, and a sense of completion missing in every day life. We enjoy them. It isn't about obtaining perfection or providing statistical value to the events. That's an invention of the gambling industry, using data to project not results but likely betting scenarios to separate you from your money. It started with football, which is much easier to quantify due to its single-event play. People have been trying like crazy to use similar data for hockey and it just doesn't work.
When a player like Trevor Lewis realizes its late in the shift in the second period and decides at the blue line to dump it in safely for a change, that isn't a failed zone entry. And it isn't a successful prevention for the defender either, its a totally irrelevant event to any statistical analysis yet it serves as such to someone who chooses to do so. What's the value of that knowledge? So some dope on X can post a chart entitled "what does Trevor Lewis even do?"
Every player ever has strengths and weaknesses, and the Idea that everyone has to be competent in all categories is just not realistic. Different roles require different plays at different times that will tick different stat boxes. No collection of data gathered from multiple sources is ever going to truly reflect what's happening, and especially so if you use sum total averages that include data from situations that have no relevance to others.
So last night Dubois had his best game in the last several weeks. Building on that positive into the next few games will matter so much more than the statistical gatherings of the failings of his first two months. THAT is what is interesting about sports. Trends matter, averages don't.