The main angle shows the leg position just fine.Part of the problem is that the moment where you see Heureux move his leg forward into that slewfoot position is obscured by the net.
An exceedingly dirty, dangerous play by a player who should be considered a repeat offender but won't be (yet).
How can I blame this on Matt Rempe?
Ug, go back and look at where they engage in a battle and the leg doesn't follow through at all. The upper part is just them battling.Uh, go back and look at where his left leg and left arm are at the start of the sequence and where they are when Spurgeon goes down. His left leg comes off the ice and goes up against the back of both of Spurgeon’s legs. His left arm goes in front of Spurgeon’s right shoulder and then pushes him backwards. That’s a textbook slew foot.
The main angle shows the leg position just fine.
Answer this question. By rule and the intent of it, how can a it be a slew foot when the slewing foot doesn't cross the parallel plane of the other foot?
You'd think the State of Hockey writers and fanbase would recognize what a slew foot is and isn't, but I guess not. We're just too homerish I guess for most to be objective.
It wasn't a slew foot. The rulebook says it isn't. The video says it isn't. Certainly not an intentional play either. It was an unfortunate, scary play that ended up with an injury. Two players went for a battle to the end boards, and this time it didn't end well. Sucks for Spurg, but that's hockey. The penalty in the game was much more than enough. A suspension is just stupid and another example of the league penalizing results instead of actions.
Yes, please look at it again. If a player is trying to slew foot somebody, they don't keep their hands on the stick/lift the opponent's stick in a normal puck battle motion. They don't "sweep" the leg (he didn't) AFTER the opponent has initiated contact. You also must look at where Spurgeon's body is from the start to the end. He's cutting in front of L'Heureux and loses his balance when they make contact. Consequently so does L'Heureux after the contact, and his legs out from him as well. I'll just say the truth straight. This is very arguably not even a penalty.
Part of the problem is that the moment where you see Heureux move his leg forward into that slewfoot position is obscured by the net.
View attachment 954496View attachment 954497
I think it’s a lot more similar to the Marchand slewfoot than it isn’t.
Dirty little rat.This will be his 12th suspension.
9 in the Q
2 in the AHL
In the OP there's the first angle that shows him clearly kicking out Spurgeon's feet.
His left leg is kicking the back of Spurgeon's skates and leg forward while at the same time his left arm is pushing Spurgeon's upper body backwards.
That's a slew foot.
View attachment 954513
View attachment 954514
View attachment 954515
He already had at the AHL level.Jesus, Spurgeon could have broken his leg there. L’Heureux has quickly established himself as a really scummy hockey player.
this is straight up embarrassing for youYou'd think the State of Hockey writers and fanbase would recognize what a slew foot is and isn't, but I guess not. We're just too homerish I guess for most to be objective.
It wasn't a slew foot. The rulebook says it isn't. The video says it isn't. Certainly not an intentional play either. It was an unfortunate, scary play that ended up with an injury. Two players went for a battle to the end boards, and this time it didn't end well. Sucks for Spurg, but that's hockey. The penalty in the game was much more than enough. A suspension is just stupid and another example of the league penalizing results instead of actions.
Yes, please look at it again. If a player is trying to slew foot somebody, they don't keep their hands on the stick/lift the opponent's stick in a normal puck battle motion. They don't "sweep" the leg (he didn't) AFTER the opponent has initiated contact. You also must look at where Spurgeon's body is from the start to the end. He's cutting in front of L'Heureux and loses his balance when they make contact. Consequently so does L'Heureux after the contact, and his legs out from him as well. I'll just say the truth straight. This is very arguably not even a penalty.
He won't get that. It's not an in-person hearing and he's not a repeat offender according to the CBA's definition.Anything less than Rempes 8 games is a joke. This was much worse and actually….caused an injury:
Jesus, Spurgeon could have broken his leg there. L’Heureux has quickly established himself as a really scummy hockey player.
That's a real bad play. Also pretty stupid for Trenin to jump over his injured teammate to try and get at the guy. Nobody ever accused hockey players of being smart I guess.